Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bheemanna, S/O Late Eranna Vs. M. Rajanna, S/O Late Mallaiah,The Orien ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
1.This appeal is directed against the judgment and award in MVC No.7819/2007 dated 13.6.2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore. The appellant was the claimant before the Tribunal and the respondents were the owner and the insurer of the offending vehicle2. The claimant filed the aforesaid petition seeking compensation for the injuries said to have been sustained by him in an accident occurred on 10.7.2007. It is his case that at about 7.00 p.m. on 10.7.2007 while he was moving near Gollahalli Railway Gate, on Nelamangala Doddaballapur road carefully observing the traffic movements, the Bajaj scooter bearing No.KA-04 S-2095 came from Kanasawadi in a rash and negligent manner without observing any traffic rules and regulations dashed against him causing grievous injuries. On account of the said accident, he sustained grievous injuries all over the body. Immediately he was shifted to Victoria hospital. Bangalore, wherein he took treatment as an inpatient. During...
Smt. B.S.Leela Vs. Srinivasu @ B.5.Sreepada Rao, B.Sjayavittala, B.S.S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard the learned counsel regarding Misc. CVL. NO. 680/2010 for stay.2.The impugned Judgment and decree dated 02- 11-2009 passed in RA No. 116/2009 on the file of II Add!, District Judge, Mysore and the Judgment and decree dated 19-03-2009 passed in OS No. 393/2002 on the file of the Judge, Court of Small Causes and Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.), Mysore, be and the same ft hereby stayed for a period of three months.3.Accordingly,Misc.CVL.NO.680/2010is allowed....
Sri. S.K. Santhosh S/O. S. Keshavan Aged About 37 Years. Vs. State of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard.The interim order granted earlier is extended until further orders. Misc. W.6858/2010 is allowed accordingly....
Sri. Anil D'Souza S/o. late Valerian, Smt. Juliet D'Souza W/o. late Va ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard.Misc.W.6565/2010 for amendment is allowed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner to file an amended Writ petiton within one week....
Kiran Traders Rep. by T.M. Nalina D/O. T.C. Puiraju Aged 49 Years Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for R-l and R-2. Sri. B. Rudragowda. learned Counsel, is directed to take notice for R-3.2.The petitioner was allotted a site bearing No. 102-A Class-C at Tumkur APMC yard and a lease cum sale agreement as per Annexure-B dated 11.6.1996 was executed in its favour. As per the said agreement, the petitioner ought to have to put up construction on the said site within a period of one year. Since the petitioner failed to put up construction as above, respondent No.3 has issued a notice dated 4.12.2008 as per Annexure-A forfeiting the site in question. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said notice dated 4.12.2008 as per Annexure-A in this writ petition.3.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.4.Learned cousnel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not put up construction on the said site in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease cum sale agreement due to the reasons beyond its control. He ...
The Managing Director, Owner Cum Internal In.Surer of the Ksrtc Vs. Sr ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
1.The Managing Director of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, ShaiUhingar, Bangalore (for short 'Corporation') has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and award in MVC No,222/2001 dated 29.10.2009 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & MACT, Srirangapatna.2. The respondent herein filed the aforesaid claim petition seeking compensation for the injuries sustained by him in an accident occurred on 7.8.1999 at 3.00 p.m. on Mysore-Bannur Road. After service of notice, the Corporation entered appearance and filed its statement of objections denying the averments made in the claim petition. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the Tribunal framed the relevant issues. The claimant got himself examined as P.W1 and documents Ex.PI to Ex.P71 have been marked in his evidence. The Doctor, who had treated the claimant was examined as C.W1. In his evidence, documents Ex.CI to Ex.C4 have been marked. The driver of :he otiending bus was examined as R.VV! and do...
Sri. Veerabhadreshwara Industrial Training College Rep. by Its Secreta ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard. Misc.W.6772/2010 is allowed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner to file an amended writ petition within one week....
S K Murthy S/0 H R Keshavamuethy Aged About 33 Years Vs. State of Karn ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Mr.D L.Suresh, advocate for the petitioner. Sri Basaveraj Kareddy, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.l and 2.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the present petition has been filed keeping in mind larger public interest and the educational career of children living in the vicinity where Tumkur University has been established.3.During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to treat the instant writ petition asi a representation on behalf of the petitioner by requiring respondent No. 2 to take a decision thereon keeping in mind the expenses involved as also the feasibility of accepting the prayers made in the instant writ petition. It is also the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no interest in the main controversy, and as such, the only effort behind filin...
K.G.Prakash. Vs. M/S. Compudyne Winfosystems Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-08-2010
ORDER1.This application is filed by the respondent no.4 to recall the NBW issued by this court. It is seen from the application that respondent no.4 was hospitalized for heart ailment and as such he was not able to present before the court on the previous hearing date. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 also submits that the statement of objections is filed. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. NBW issued against respondent no.4 is hereby recalled....
State by Saligrama Police. Vs. Sannahaida @ Thimiiicgowda S/O Late Sri ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-07-2010
1.This appeal is by the State against the judgment of acquittal in Criminal Appeal No. 16/2004 on the file of PrI.Sessions Judge. Mysore dated 25lh November 2004. reversing the judgment of conviction in C.C.No.20/2003 dated 17.1.2004 on the file of J.M.F.C., K.R.Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 341. 323. 325 read with Section 34 of IPC.2.Saligrama Police charge sheeted the respondent Nos. 1and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 341. 323, 325 read with Section 34 of IPC.3.Case of the prosecution is that, at about 7.30 a.m. on 10.10.2002. accused Nos.1 and 2 at Mundoor village with a common intention picked tip a quarrel with PW-1 in connection with the flowing of water in the canal.Complainant saw the accused diverting the canal water to their land en questioning, accused Nos.l and 2 assaulted him, he fell down and sustained grievous injury with dislocation of hip joint.4.Police on investigation filed the charge sheet. Before the trial court, the prosecution to...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »