Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Raghu S/O Venkateshappa Aged About 25 Years. Vs. State of Karnatak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-11-2010
1.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissal of petition as withdrawn. His submission is recorded. Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
(iMPLEADiNG APPLiCANTS,- Ms. Aani K.V D/o.'Mr. Varghese K.T. Age: 23 y ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-11-2010
ORDER1.Heard.Misc. Ws.7457/2010 and 7458/2010 are allowed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner to file amended writ petitions....
Chief Controller of Accounts. Vs. Official Liquidator of Mysore Kirlos ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-11-2010
ORDER1.The NBW issued by this Court on 21.07.2010 against the Chief Controller of Accounts. Department of Supply at Chennai is hereby recalled subject to the condition learned counsel keeping the Assistant Controller of Accounts, Department of Supply, Chennai present before the Court on the next date of hearing....
Ekantha Traders Vs. the Director Agricultural Produce Marketing Commit ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-10-2010
ORDER1.The petitioner was allotted a site bearing No.l07-B at Tumkur APMC yard and a lease cum sale agreement as per Annexure-A dated 7.4.1997 was executed in its favour. As per the said agreement, the petitioner ought to have to put up construction on the said site within a period of one year. Since the petitioner failed to put up construction as above, respondent No.2 has issued a notice dated 4.12.2008 as per Annexure-B forfeiting the site in question. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said notice dated 4.12.2008 as per Annexure-B in this writ petition. 2.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties3.Learned cousnel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not put up construction on the said site in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease cum sale agreement due to the reasons beyond its control. He further submits that the petitioner will put up construction on the said site in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease cum sa...
Sanjana Singh R D/O. C. Rajendra Singh Aged About 17 Years, Vs. Sri. D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-10-2010
ORDER1.Learned Ceunse; for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.2. Tne memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Sri.K.Ravi Kumar Aged About 45 Years S/O Kariyappa Vs. the Authorised ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Proceedings are initiated under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Recovery of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Act, 2002.2.Petitioner is an accused in CrLMisc.No. 1335/2009 filed under the above provision for actual possession of the property mortgaged. Now the learned Magistrate by the impugned order had permitted the Bank to take possession and the Bank has also taken possession. At this juncture,this petition has been filed. 3.After hearing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, today the petitioner would pay Rs.2,00,0G0/ end another Rs.8,00,000/- he will pay on or before 31st August 2010 and the remaining balance, he would pay on or before 30th September 2010. 4.Learned Counsel for the Bank has no objection to accept the terms of the petitioner and submits that, in case the entire amount due to the Bank is not paid on or before30th September 2010, the Bank may be permitted to take possession of the property in question.5. In view of th...
Byranahalii Shivanyufthy S/O. Halappa Aged About 39 Years, Vs. Smt. Ba ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard.2.Interim stay of the judgment and award dated 21.6.2010 in MVC No. 150/2006 on the file of the Fast Track Court and Additional MACT NO. 11; Badravathi . until further orders.Misc.Cvl.No.12019/2010 is accordingly allowed...
B. Thippareddy and Co. by Its Proprietor Sri. B.T. Manjunatha Reddy S/ ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for R-1 and R-2. Sri.H.K.Thimmegowda,learned Counsel,is directed to take notice for P.-3.2.'ITie petitioner was allotted a site bearing No.O-3 at Chitradurga APMC yard and a lease cum sale agreement as per Annexure-A dated 06.03.1997 was executed in its favour. As per the said agreement, the petitioner ought to have to put up construction on the said site within a period of one year. Since the petitioner failed to put up construction as above, respondent No.3 has issued a notice dated 24/26.11.2008 as per Annexure-C forfeiting the site in question. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said notice dated 24/26.11.2008 as per Annexure-C in this writ petition. 3.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 4.Learned cousnel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not put up construction on the said site in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease cum sale agreement due to the reasons beyond its contr...
Dr. Ch. Laxman Reddv Aged About 32 Years Vs. the Rajiv Gandhi Universi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1. Heard.Misc. W. 5427/2010 for amendment is allowed....
M/S. Giri Da:shini Trading Co, M/S. Maheshwari Stores Rice Merchants V ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2010
ORDER1.Heard.2.Misc. W.5125/2010 is allowed. Learned Counsel for the petitioners to implead the proposed respondents as respondents-5 to 7. Misc. W.5126/2010 is allowed .Learned Counsel for the petitioners to file an amended writ petition within one week....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »