Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri T.S. Shrinivas, S/O Sri T.K. Subramanyam, Aged About 39 Years. and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-20-2010
ORDER1.The petitioners are elected as the councilors of Tiptur City Municipal Council. Their grievance is over the throwing open the post of President of the local body to the SC(W) category.2.Sri V.B. Siddaramaiah, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in W.P.No.2155/08, the respondent No.l has held out the assurance that in the next term (sixth term), the Tiptur City Municipal Council is eligible for BCA/BCB/BCB(W) categories. Acting contrary to what they have said in their statement of objections in the earlier writ petition, the decision-makers have now given it to the SC(W) category,3.Sri Siddaramaiah further submits that there is no woman belonging to the SC category. According to him earmarking of the post for SC(W) is not correct, when not even a single councilor belonging to that category is available. He submits that the respondent No.5 spuriously claimed that she belonged to SC. On knowing the truth, the competent authority has already withdrawn the caste cert...
Sri.Narayana Murthy @ Keshava Murthy @ Mutiny S/O Ramachandrappa Aged ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
ORDER1.Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissal of criminal petition. His submission is taken on record. Accordingly, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
K N Gopalakrishna S/O Neelaiah Aged About 37 Years. Vs. State by Mandy ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
ORDER1.After arguing the matter for sometime, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissed of criminal petition. His submission is taken on record. Accordingly, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Sri Pavan @ Pavanktraiar S/O.Ravee a/O 24 Years Vs. the State by K.T.J ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2010
ORDER1.When the matter is taken up for hearing, teamed Counsel for petitioner submits that where the application was filed before the learned Sessions Judge, charge sheet was not filed. How, the charge sheet has been filed. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the trial Court.2. His submission is taken on record.3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application More the learned trial Judge....
Dr.Mohammed Akbar @ Shakeelahmed Aged About 42 Years S/O Late Aziz Ahm ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2010
ORDER1.Petitioners nave sought for anticipatory bail in Cr.No.66/2010 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC by Harihara Town Police Station.2. Petitioners have not approached the District and Sessions Judge at Davangere. Petitioners cannot approach this Court without exhausting remedy before the learned District and Sessions Judge at Davangere. With these observations, criminal petition is dismissed .Petitioners are at liberty to make application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. before the learned District and Sessions Judge at Davangere....
Shri. N. Murali S/O. NanjundappA. Vs. Senior Geologist Mines and Geolo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2010
ORDER1.This Review Petition is taken up for final hearing with consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC R/w Article 226 of the Constitution of India for review of the order passed by this Court in W P No. 19678/2009 Dt. 17.7.2009, wherein this Court has declined to interfere with the order passed by the second respondent, rejecting renewal of the license granted for quarrying the sand for the year 2006-07.2.We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.3.The material facts of the case leading to this Review Petition are as follows:The Review petitioner herein filed W P NO.19678/20C9 challenging the order passed by the competent authority Dt. 28.5.2009, rejecting the application of the petitioner for renewal of lease by way of extension for the year 2006-07 on the basis of the application filed by the Writ Pet...
M/S Devi Wines. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-16-2010
order1.Learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for the respondent.2. Petitioner has called in question the order dated 22.4.2010 wherein the learned Magistrate has rejected the objections filed by the petitioner on the ground that, the earlier objections filed on 24.12.1999 were rejected by order dated 12.1.2000 and the said order has not been challenged and as such, the learned Magistrate refused to accept the subsequent objections sought to be filed.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has relied on the reply filed by the Assessing Authority in the same proceedings produced at Annexures-H and J and pointed out that, the Assessing Authority does not hold the petitioner as responsible for the default, however, the learned trial Judge has found that the complaint itself is against the petitioner and the question of considering the further objections after rejection does not arise. If the stand of the Assessing Authority is that the petitioner is not liable for the default...
Ms.Kapila Saigal D/ O Sri.Narendra Saigal Aged About 39 Years, Vs. Sta ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-16-2010
ORDER1.Petitioner has called in question the proceedings in FIR in Cr.No.160/10 registered by Cubbon Park police, Bangalore, offences punishable under Sections 420, 403, 406 & 477-A of IPC.2. Respondent No,2 is a complainant he filed a private complaint before the 4th AddLC.M.M,, Bangalore, in PCR No ,2586$/10 interalia alleging that she had entrusted the running concern in the name and style as "Cohiba Club" to the petitioner and on account of her emergency work, she had left India to U.S.A. On her return from USA, she found that, the accused had not paid rent to the landlord and cheques given for Rs.32 lakhs were dishonoured and Excise license was cancelled and she was put to loss. She further alleged that, the name of the business concern was changed into New Heera Panna", a Proprietary concern and the accused had taken all the assets of the said establishment to new restaurant at Koramangala and where he is running another establishment in the name and style Chandini Chowk".3,Learn...
Sri. G.S.Vijay Kumar Son of Late Siddaramanna Aged About 35 Years, Smt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-16-2010
ORDER1.Learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for the respondent.2.Petitioners had sought for discharge on the ground that, the allegations made against the petitioners do not constitute an offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and even the allegation, as stated in the complaint and the charge sheet, only shows that the petitioners tried to assault the complainant with the helmet on the stomach, but it fell on the back.3.Learned Trial Judge considering the nature of overt act on the part of the petitioners has found that the prima facie material discloses the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and rejected the application of the petitioners for discharge. 4.Whether the overt act intended to kill the complainant or not, is the matter, which could be considered at the trial, based on the evidence available, if the learned Judge finds that the evidence is insufficient, he would definitely consider the same and pass appropriate order. In these circumstances, I...
Sri K. B. Yatihraj S/O. Late K. Basavaiah Aged About 62. Years . Vs. t ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-12-2010
ORDER1.The learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh writ petition after furnishing typed copies of all the annexures.2. Memo is taken on record and petition is dismissed as withdrawn...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »