Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Director, M/S Colliers Jarcline India Property Services Pvt. Ltd., ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.Learned Counsel for respondent No.5(a) to 5(d) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw Misc.Cvl.No.8608/2010 with liberty to make an appropriate application before the Tribunal 2.The submission of the learned Counsel for respondent No.5(a) to 5(d) is placed on record. Misc.Cvl.No.8608/2010 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above....
M/S. Techno Heat Ovens and Furnaces Pvt. Ltd.,vs. Esi Corporahon, Binn ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
1.This appeal is filed by the employer questioning the correctness and legality of the order dated 19-4-2007 passed by Employees' State Insurance Court in E.S.I. Application No,71/2005 whereunder order passed under Section 45-A of the E.S.I Act dated 15-11-2005 came to be confirmed and appeal came to be allowed in part.2.Keared the advocates appearing for the parties. Appeal is admitted to consider the following substantialquestion of law:(a) Whether the orders passed by the Court below is a perverse order, for non consideration of material on record, and also for not considering the authorities relied on by the appellant, and for not giving reasons for non-consideration thereof, and is an order passed on such basis is tenable in Law?(b) Whether E.S.I, contributions are payable on assumed wages or an actual wages paid to the workmen?3. The facts in nutshell leading to the filing of this appeal are as under:The appellant herein is engaged in the manufacture and sale of Bakerv Ovens and ...
The Divisional Controller, Ksrtc,vs. Mr. Lohith, S/O Koragappa Sapalya ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.Heard. Interim stay of the judgment and award in MVC No.34/2008 dated 20.3.2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, D.K., Mangalore. Misc.Cvl.No. 13217/2010 stands allowed accordingly....
Sri.Munishamappa S/ O A. K, Lakshmaiah Aged About 50 Years. Vs. the De ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this petition. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Sri Raghavendra Kumar S/O Late Ganganrja Aged About. 26 Years, and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.When the matter is taken up tor hearing, the learned Counsel for petitioner prays for withdrawal of petition with liberty to file a fresh l*ail application, after the charge sheet is filed2. His submission is taken on record.3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to fife a fresh bail application, after the charge sheet is filed....
M. Muniswamy Kambli Muniswamy S/O Late Muniyan 50 Years, and ors. Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
1.In view of the memo filed in Court today, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn....
The Divisional Controller, Ksrtc,vs. Lakshmamma, W/O Late KambannA. Ag ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.Heard. Interim stay of the judgment and award in MVC No.700/2008 dated 18.3.2010 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and Addl. MACT at Tumkur. Misc.Cvl.No. 13222/2010 stands allowed accordingly....
A.R Jagadish S/O.Late Gadi Ramegowda Aged About 33 Years. Vs. State by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.The learned Counsel for petitioner prays for dismissal of petition as withdrawn.2.His submission is taken on record.3.Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Sri Shivamurthy, Son of Late Siddaveerappa, Hindu, Aged About 60 Years ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1.Petitioners/plaintiffs have filed this writ petition against respondent/defendant to quash the order dated 24.02.2010 as at Annexure-B.2.Heard Sri A.V.Srinivas, learned advocate for the petitioners .Learned counsel for the respondent has remained absent continuously.3.Sri A.V.Srinivas contended that, the respondent has neither made out any ground for filing of written statement after the right was lost nor has given any sufficient reason as to why the written statement could not be filed within the prescribed time and without there being any reason, the trial court has accepted the written statement, which is illegal. Learned counsel further contended that, Rule 23 of the Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967, states that the parties seeking multiple prayers should file separate applications in respect of each distinct prayer and when several prayers are combined in one application, the court has to direct the applicant to confine the application only to one prayer and file a ...
Sri B P Mahendra, 45 Yrs.Vs. State of Karnalaka - by Its Prl. Secretar ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2010
ORDER1)Petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 15 5.2010 - annexure Z by the 1st respondent and the official memorandum dated 20.5.2010 - annexure A issued by the 3 respondent and, for a mandamus directing the 1st and 6th respondents to continue the RTC and mutation and other revenue records in respect of Sy.No.15 measuring about 44.33 acres situate at Sajjepalya, Yeshwanthpur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, in the name of the petitioner and others as it stood then. 2) According to the petitioner, one Smt Rangamma W/o B K Krishnappa who is the maternal aunt of the father of the petitioner, had executed a Will bequeathingl her immovable properties in Sy.No.15, 8, 9, 10 and 13 in all, measuring about 96.36 acres of Sajjepalya, Bangalore North Taluk and the lands in Sy.No.43 and 44 measuring about 96.36 acres situate at Malagalu Village, Yeshwanthpur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk. The Will is said to have been executed on 29.3.1962. The said Rangam...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »