Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments

D.S. Natesha @ Nata S/O. Late Sannappa Shetty, Aged About 30 Years, an ...

Court: Karnataka

1. The petitioners are facing trial in S.C. No. 78/2008 for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201, 114 r/w section 34 of IPC.2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Advocate.3. I have been taken through the investigation records. There are eye witnesses to the occurrence. The petitioners along with other accused had caused as many as 17 injuries to the deceased. In Post Mortem Examination report, the cause of death is shown as shock and hemorrhage. The case is pending for trial. In the circumstances, petitioners cannot be released on bail. Therefore, the petition is dismissed....

Santosha, S/O. Thope Gowda, Age 21 Years, Vs. State of KarnatakA. by H ...

Court: Karnataka

1.The petitioner is arrayed as Accused No.3 in Crime No. 169/2009 registered for offences punishable under sections 302, 201, 120 (B) r/w section 34 of IPC.2.I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Advocate.3.I have been taken through the investigation records. Which would reveal that on 8.6.2009, Accused No.1 Mahesh bad taken deceased Ravi to go to the house of would-be-bridegroom of the sister of the deceased. They did not visit the house of bridegroom as expected. Therefore, witnesses, namely, Harish and Mahesh tried to contact the deceased. But they could not contact him. Later they contacted the deceased who informed them that he would reach the place. The members of the said house had asked the deceased as to how many persons were accompanying him probably to make proper arrangements. At that time, deceased told that he was in the company of accused No.3 and other accused. The deceased neither visited the house of bridegroom nor returned to his ...

Sidda @ Siddesh S/O. Nagappa, Aged About 28 Years,and ors.Vs. the Stat ...

Court: Karnataka

1. Petitioners herein are Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 4/2010 registered an offence punishable, under sections 302 r/w. 34 of IPC.2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned Government Advocate.3. The investigation records would reveal that the Accused No. 1 had illicit intimacy with the sister of the deceased. The witnesses namely CWs. 13 and 14 had over heard the conversation of Accused No.1 with the other accused to do away with the deceased. After the incident, chopper was recovered at the instance of the accused No.1. PWs 18 and 19 had seen the accused moving from the place of recovery after the occurrence. The above narrated circumstances would make out a prima facie case against the petitioner for an offence punishable under section 302 of IPC. Therefore, he cannot be released on bail.4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has made available the copy of the order in Crl.P.No.3138/2010 to contend that accused No.3 has been granted bail and therefo...

Manja @ Manjunatha, S/O. Mahadevappa, Aged About 24 Years, Vs. State b ...

Court: Karnataka

1.The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed....

Smt. R.N. Padmavathi Vs. Sri Chikka Gangappa and Another.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR201OKAR4230.

ORDER1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 10.8.10 on LA. V passed in 0 S.436.1/06 declining to decree the suit on the basis of the admission contained in the written statement of the respondents.2. The facts in a nutshell are that;The respondents/defendants have executed an agreement of sale in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff on 25.11.05 to sell property bearing Khaneshumari No.71/79 of Somashettyhalli Village, Yeshwantpur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, measuring 21/2 guntas, for a consideration of Rs. 1,30,000/-. Petitioner sent a notice dated 6.5.06 calling upon respondents to execute the sale deed and convey the property. Since the respondents neither replied to the notice nor came forward to execute the sale deed, petitioner filed O.S.4361/06 on 23.05.06 against the respondents seeking the relief of specific performance.3. The respondents have filed written statement on 4.9.06 and sought dismissal of the suit with exemplary cost.4. The petitioner filed I.A.V ...

The Commissioner of Income-tax and anr Vs. Smt.K.G.Rukminiamma, Partne ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2010KAR4711

1. This appeal is by the revenue challenging the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal as well as the Appellate Authority holding that, in the facts and circumstances of this case, the assesses is entitled to deduction under Section 54 and the capital gains would be nil.2. Assesses Smt. Rukminiyamma had a property at Basavanagudi. She entered into a joint development agreement with builder M.A.Mohan Kumar on 8.7.2002 to develop die said property. According to the agreement, die assesses is die owner of the property bearing No. 69 (old 17 and later 46) situated at Govindappa Road. Basavanagudi, Bangalore-2. measuring 30' x 1 10'. The builder agreed to construct residential apartment and agreed to deliver 48% of die super built area to the assesses in the form of residential apartments. The entire cost of construction and other expenses are to be bome by die builder. Accordingly, as agreed, the builder constructed eight flats and handed over four flats to die assesses. Out of the four f...

Sri Ravichandra S/O Late Munigangappa Aged About 25,vs. State by Polic ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1.Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a dated 23.08.2010 seeking withdrawal of this petition The memo is taken on record. Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....

Sri Yallappa S Athani Aged 46 Years,vs. Weizmann Homes Limited,and anr ...

Court: Karnataka

1.The appellant is not present. The appellant's counsel was also not presents 24.8.2010, so also today.2. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed....

Smtshalini W/O Shreesh K.Muadambadithaya and. Age 25 Years, Vs. Mahend ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to dismiss the petition as withdrawn,2. Permitted. petition is dismissed as withdrawn,...

Sri. K Satyanarayana Sastry S/O Sri. K. Venkatachalmappa Aged About 68 ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1.When the matter is taken up. learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered by the ruling of this Court in W.P.No. 19330/2010 decided on 9.08.2010. Following the reasoning stated therein, this writ petition also stands disposed of on identical terms. Petition stands disposed of accordingly....