Karnataka Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of India, National Highway Authority of India, Represented ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
1.This matter is called twice.2.Neither the appellants nor the learned counsel appearing for the appellants are present. It shows that they are not diligent to prosecute the case. Hence, the appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution....
State of Karnataka by Nelamangala P.S Vs. Chandrappa,2, Murthy @ Narsi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER 1.This petition is only against the order dated 20.4.2009 passed in S.C.No.265/2005, wherein the application filed by the prosecution for recalling the prosecution witness was rejected. It is submitted that, the said case has been disposed of and the accused have been acquitted.In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous....
M/S Ranka and Shah Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Karnatakastate of K ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDERTaking on record the memo dt. 28.7.2010 enclosing the copy of the letter dt. 24.7.2010 addressed to the petitioner informing the petitioner that the KIADB- in its meeting held on 5.9.2010 approved a plan for industrial area and the development works in the said area are under progress, the allotment letter indicating Plot No.and terms and conditions of allotment including developmental charges payable by the petitioner will be issued in due course, nothing further survives for consideration in this petition and is, accordingly disposed of. It is needless to state that if the petitioner is not. allotted the site within six months from today, provided the petitioner to ensured that the property, subject matter of acquisition is free from all admitted litigation, is entitled to re-open the case....
M/S. Electronics and Controls, (A) Smi. Sundari Ramachandran, (B) Ms. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER1.In this writ petition order dated 3-8-2007 passed in G.S.No 2268/1996 by the 27* Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore (Annexure-J) by answering issue No.4 holding that suit is not barred by limitation, is impugned herein.2.The brief facts leading to filing of the writ petition are as under.:Respondent No.2 herein was allotted an industrial site by the first respondent Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board'for brevity) and was put in actual possession of the industrial site by issuing possession certificate in the year 1988.Thereafter the Board is said to have allotted the same industrial site to the petitioner herein in 1990 and it is said to have executed lease cum-sale agreement in favour of the petitioner in 1994. Respondent No.2 has filed a suit O.S.No.2268/1996 before the City Civil Court initially for the relief of permanent injunction and later on an application was filed to incorporate the prayer to declare that second respo...
Dr. P. Muruli S/O Dr.B.P.Puttabyatappa, Kavitba Byatappa W/O B.P.Putta ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
1.Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that ,the petitioners have filed an application for discharge and the trial Court has rejected the said application .If that is so, it is open to the petitioners to challenge the same. Accordingly, this petiton is dismissed....
Smt. Sharada W/O Late Kampu AmIn @ Kampu Poojary, Aged 58 Years, Lokes ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER1.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents.2. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs before the trial Court in a suit for declaration of title and injunction. During the pendency of the suit, respondents 6 to 8 sought to implead themselves on the ground that they have a direct interest in the suit property and that they have been deliberately excluded from the array of parties and in respect of the very property, there is a suit pending in O.S.No. 19/03 before the Court of Principal Civil Judge(Sr.Dn), Udupi and that any decree passed in the present suit would have a direct bearing on the suit property and would lead tomultiplicity of proceedings. The application having been allowed, the petitioners are before this Court.3. It is contended that the suit having been filed to seek declaration of title and protect possession as against defendants 1 to 5, the other respondents who had filed the impleading application seeking to implead themselves on the gro...
Central Bank of India Vs. M/S. W.S.Telesystems Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDERThis application is filed to condone the delay in filing the claim petition. I perused the averments made in the application and I am convinced with the explanation for the delay.Accordingly, the application is hereby allowed.The delay in filing the claim petition is hereby condoned...
C. V. Venkatasubramaniam S/O C. K. Venkatakrishnan, Aged About 40 Year ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER1.This petition coming for preliminary hearing is taken up for final disposal.2.The learned Standing counsel for the Karnataka Public Land Corporation. Sri.CLKrishuamurthy, is directed to take notice and the learned Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent No.2 The Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk. Bangalore.3.The petitioner claims to be the owner of a residential site No. 170 in S.No. 120 of Kammanahalli Village. Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. Bangalore Urban District. It is claimed that the property has been privately developed as a residential layout and the petitioner claims to have purchased a site after such development. The petitioner claims that property tax has been paid and katha has been obtained from the Bangalore Bruliai Mahanagara 1'alike. The petitioner also claims to have obtained sanction of plan from the Local Authority at the relevant point of time and he has also obtained electricity connection and raised loans for obtaining necessary ...
S. Shankara Gowda, S/O Late Sanne Gowda,v. Srinivsa, S/O. V. Venkatara ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER1.This Misc.W., is filed by the learned counsel for the Accused with a prayer to recall warrant ordered on 3.8.2010 to the accused, in the interest of justice and equity. 2.We have heard the learned counsel for the complainants and learned counsel appearing for the accused.3.For the reasons stated in the Misc.W., the instant Misc.W.is allowed and the order dated 3.8.2010 is recalled....
State of Karnataka by Nelamangala Police Station Vs. Reddy Katti Rames ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
ORDER1.This petition is only against the order dated 20.4.2009 passed in S.C.No. 112/2006, wherein the application filed by the prosecution for recalling the prosecution witness was rejected.It is submitted that, the said case has been disposed of and the accused have been acquitted.In view of the same,this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »