Karnataka Court November 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mylarappa S/O D.J.Lingappa Vs. the State of Karnataka by Town Police C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. The petitioner is the father-in-law of deceased Kavya who committed suicide due to dowry harassment meted out to her by petitioner and other accused.2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleading for the State and I have been taken through the investigation records, which would reveal that the husband of deceased and mother-in-law of deceased were harassing the deceased in relation to dowry demand. I do not find any allegation made against this petitioner.3. In the circumstances, without going into further details, direction sought for is granted for a limited period to enable the petitioner to seek regular bail.4. In the result, I pass the following:ORDERPetition is accepted. Petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, subject to following conditions:1) If the petitioner is arrested in Crime No.315/2010 of Chitradurga Town PS., registered for the offences punishable underSections 498-A, 304E r/w 34 I.P.C. and Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, he shal...
Ramanna S/O Bhimappa Kalhal and ors Vs. the State of KarnatakA.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
ORDER1. A case has been registered by the Kerur Police against the petitioners in Crime NO. 123/2010 for offences punishable under Section 80. 81 OF KP ACT AND 143, 147, 148, 336. 342. 323. 324. 504, 506, 509, 353, 307 R/W 149 OF IPC.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and in fact they were playing cards but not andar-bahar. Since it was a festival day, the people surrounding the village gathered and they were playing cards not for gambling purpose. As it is stated in the complaint itself about 17 police officials on receiving the credible information that the petitioners were gambling went to the spot and gherowed the said assembly and on enquiry, the police came to know about names and address of each one of them who were about 44 persons and two of the said unlawful assembly escaped and brought about 50-60 people to the spot and they were armed with stones, clubs etc. Those persons who were arrested were gran...
The General Manager/ Managing Director, Ksrtc and Lt. Devendra Singh, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. These two appeals are respectively filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation' for short) and the claimant against the very same impugned common judgment and award dated 21st June 2002, passed in M.V.C.No.2588/1994. by the V Additional Judge. Court of Small Causes and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Mayo hall Unit. Bangalore, (for short. Tribunal'), awarding compensation of 5,55.500/- in favour of the claimant as against his claim for 15,71,140/-.2. While the Corporation has filed the appeal on the ground that the compensation awarded is excessive, exorbitant and needs to be substantially reduced, the claimant has filed the appeal on the ground that the compensation awarded by Tribunal is inadequate and needs to be enhanced, by modifying the impugned judgment and award passed by Tribunal.3. The facts in brief are that, the claimant claims to be aged about 29 years, at the time of accident, working as Flying Air Crew Officer at AS...
Laxmichand, Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., and ors
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. Admit.2. Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 11.01.2005 passed in MVC No.4598/2004 on the file of the Judge, Court Of Small Cav.ses & Member Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. Bangalore (SCCH-9) (for short Tribunal'), the appellant has presented this appeal seeking just and reasonable compensation for the death of his wife Smt.Maya @ Mayadevi on account of the mjurias sustained by her in the road traffic accident. Trie brief facte of the case are: That the appellant claims to is the husband of the deceased Maya @ Mayadevi. Hi contention before the Tribunal was that the deceased was aged about 55 years, working as a partner in Rameah Automobiles and earning income of 25,000/- p.m. She was hale and healthy prior to the accident. That on 8.2.2004, at about 1.15 p.m., while the deceased was crossing the road kt K.H.Road in front of Vijaya Bank, at that time, a Matador F-37 (Bajaj Tempo) bearing No.KA 04 1811, driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, with h...
Sri Thomas K G Vs. the Managing Director Bangalore Metropolitan Transp ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. The appeal is by the claimant for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.2. Heard, the appeal is admitted and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up ibr final disposal.3. For the sake of congruence, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the claim petition before the Tribunal.4. The brief facts of the case:On 07.09.2005, when the claimant was returning after purchasing vegetables in Madiwala Market, a bus bearding registration No. KA-01-F-1178 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against him. As a result, the claimant fell down and sustained injuries. Hence, he filed a claim petition before MACT, Bangalore seeking compensation of Rs .8,00,000/-. The Tribunal awarded him a compensation of Rs. 1,16,060/ - and after deducting 20% contributory negligence on the part of the claimant has awarded compensation of Rs.92,848/-rounded off to Rs.93,000/- with interest at 7% p.a.5. As there is no dispute regarding ...
The State by Banaswadi Police Vs. Prema M W/C L C Ramo and K V Anil Ku ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. Heard this appeal at the stage of admission itself and taken up for disposal2. The accused - respondents were charge sheeted by the Banaswadi Police, Bangalore, on the allegations that on 1.2.2006 at about 11.30 am, the accused armed with weapons committed trespass into the property of the complainant, demolished the house and also abused the complainant by taking out the taste name and threatened to face dire consequences. The Police have charge sheeted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 3(l)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 [for short 'BC & SC Act'] and also under Sections 448.. 427 and 506 r/w. Section 34 of IPC, based on the complaint Sled by one Malathi.3. According to the complainant, the house property bet ring No. 190 at Lingarajapura, Bangalore, near the land in Survey No.81/4 measuring 30 guntas, was demolished by the accused Nos.1 & 2 and others and threatened the complainant and others with dire consequen...
D.N.Annaiah S/O Late S Narayana Rao and ors Vs. D.N.Shankar Kumar S/O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. Appellants are the challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and decree passed by the City Civil Court, Bangalore dated 12.3.2007 in O.S.No.8380/2003. The appellants were defendants and respondent was the plaintiff in the suit.2. Facts leading to this case are as hereunder: Plaintiff and defendants are children of one Narayana Rao. Plaint schedule properties were owned by Narayana Rao. Plaintiff filed the suit on the ground that he is entitled to l/4t share in plaint A and B schedule properties on the ground that his share has not been given by the deferCones has filed suit for partition and separate possession of the property. Plaint A schedule properties are agricultural lands situated in different villages and plaint-B schedule property is situated in Nagappa Block, Srirampuram, Bangalore. Defendants have filed written statement. They admit the relationship between the plaintiff and themselves. Fart.ies also admit the existence of the joint family properties. They ...
State of Karnataka Vs. Shareef Ahmed. S/O Mohammed Sab,
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
1. This appeal is filed by the State challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.,) and JMFC, Shikaripura in C.C.No.367/2002 acquitting the respondent of the offence under Section 392 IPC.2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 13.02.2002 at about 713 p m., when the complainant Yashodha was walking on the road side in front of the house of her brother at Chennakeshwara Layout at Shikaripura, the accused came from back side of the said Yashodha and pulled her gold chain from the neck without the consent of CW-2 by using force and thereby accused was charged of the offence under Section 392 IPC.3. In order to prove the case, the prosecution has examined in all 9 witnesses and got marked Ex.PI to PI 2 and produced MOS - 1 and 2 being the god chain and dollar with Lakshmi figure. The prosecution commenced in this case with the complaint lodged by one Shivashankarappa who has stated that Vaehodha is his sister and on 13.02.2002 between 7.00 p mind 7.15 p....
Sreenivasa @ Seena @ Salution Seena - Major S/O Late Nagaraju and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
ORDER1. The petitioners arrayed as accused No.2 to 4 are alleged to have committed murder of Basavaraju on 01.04.2010.2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the State. I have taken through the investigation records.3. The case of prosecution rests on circumstantial evidence. The circumstances against accused No.2 to 4 are as follows:4. During the evening of 1.4.2010 accused No.2 to 4 were taking drinks near Rotighar. Shettihalli, Tumkur. After the occurrence, accused No.2, 4, 3 were staying in Sita Lodge at Bangalore. After their arrest on the information volunteered by accused No.3, a Nokia Mobile phone belonging to the deceased, a knife and a long were recovered. On the information volunteered by accused No.2 and 4 knife and long were recovered. On consideration of the circumstances made out against accused No.2 to 4, 1 find that accused No.2 was in possession of Nokia Mobile phone belonging to the deceased within few days after the inciden...
Shivaprasanna, S/O C.Dasharatha Vs. the State by Rajajinagar Police St ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
ORDER1. This Criminal Petition is corning on for orders, this day the Court made the following: Sri M. Sharass Chandra, advocate files power for Respondent No.2 along with the undertaking affidavit of the complainant/Respondent No.2. Complainant/Respondent No.2 is present before the Court. She admits her signature on the undertaking affidavit.2. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that a suitable order may be passed.3. The undertaking affidavit dated 3.10.2010 reads as under:"I, Swetha. B.S., W/o Shivaprasanna. CD., aged about 27 years, residing at #36, Flat-1, Sri. Durga complex, BSK 3rd Stage, Nr. Big Bazzar, Kathruguppe main road, Bangalore, Petitioner No.2 herein do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows;1. I am the respondent no.2 / complainant in the above case and I am fully conversant and aware with the facts of the case. Hence, I am swearing to this affidavit.2. I state that I have filed Criminal complaint in Crime No.31/2009 before the Rajajinagar Polic...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »