Karnataka Court April 2009 Judgments
Mrutyunjaya S/O Beedi Rudraiah Vs. State of Karnataka by Malur Police ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. Petitioner is accused No. 1 who along with his wife Bagyamma are facing charges for offences punishable under Section 20B of the NDPS Act which is under investigation in Crime No. 276 of 2008 on the file of the Malur Police Station.2. According to the prosecution, on 10.02.2008 on the basis of information received the police officers headed by the Circle Inspector of police and panchas raided the car bearing registration No. KA-05 M-3505 parked in the compound of the house of the accused No. 1 Mrutyunjaya and found in the car 18 Kgs. of ganja and on questioning, the petitioner herein escaped from the place leaving behind his wife the 2nd accused who also could not justify the lawful possession under permit. On that basis, she was arrested and search was launched for accused No. 1. During further investigation, he has been arrested.3. The prosecution claims to have seized 18 Kgs. of ganja and have complied with the mandatory provisions of the Act regarding seizure...
Tag this Judgment!Gowramma W/O Munivenkata Reddy Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by the ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. The petitioner is co-accused in Crime No. 248/08 of Hebbal police for the offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case in question has been registered on the complaint given by one Narayanamma. According to her statement, no direct allegation is made against the petitioner for having indulged in acts constituting the offence under Section 307 I.P.C or any other offence. Learned Counsel submits to save the ordeal of trial, quashing of F.I.R. is necessary.3. I have perused the records.4. It is seen that on the complaint given by Narayanamma, the case was registered against the petitioner and her son-Nagaraja Reddy, alleging that on the death of Narayanamma's husband, her foster daughter-Gowramma and biological daughter-Anandamma were living in Cholanayakanahalli and the latter was eking out her livelihood from the rent collected from a small house. Gowramma demanded rent from Anandamma and locked her house, ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri V. Vijaya Bhaskar S/O D. Nagaraja Vs. Smt. G. Nandini W/O Sri V. V ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. The petition is under Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. seeking withdrawal of case in Cr. Misc. No. 18 of 2009 from the file of JMFC, Bangarpet to be transferred and assigned to Family Court at Bangalore.2. The contextual facts as manifests, disclose petitioner V. Vijaya Bhaskar is husband of G. Nandini through whom he has a daughter Shweta aged 1 1/2 years.3. On the allegation of willful neglect and deprival of basic sustenance, Nandini has filed a petition seeking maintenance invoking Section 125 Cr.P.C., which petition is pending adjudication on the file of the learned JMFC, Bangarpet.4. The petitioner in the meantime appears to have thought of seeking company of his wife and filed M.C. No. 997 of 2009 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restoration of conjugal right. Such petition is filed at Family Court, Bangalore.5. In this petition, the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the maintenance case filed by his wife from Bangarpet Court to the Family Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Chandrashekar K. S/O Kallaya and Vs. Bangalore City Institute (Reg ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court in pending O.S. No. 27o9/2009 on 18.4.2009 directing issue of notice to the defendants on an application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2.2. The suit filed by the plaintiff is to declare that the resolution Nos. 1 to 4, copies of which are produced before the Trial Court at Annexure-L are unjust, illegal and contrary to bye-laws and provisions of Karnataka Societies Registration Act and it is in such a suit plaintiff had sought for an order of temporary injunction to restrain the defendant society from holding a proposed special general body meeting on 3.5.2009. While learned judge of the trial court did not grant an ex-parte order of temporary injunction, only issued notice on the I.A. to the defendants. Aggrieved by this order the present appeal.3. The registry has raised an objection pointing out that the appe...
Tag this Judgment!Manjunath M. S/O Muthaiah Vs. the State of Karnataka by the Police of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. The petitioner is arraigned as Accused No. 6 in Crime No. 81/2004 by Peenya Police Station, which is for investigation of offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC.2. The petitioner is in judicial custody attar his arrest en 10-3-2009 from there, he made an attempt before the learned Magistrate which failed and then before the learned City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore without any benefit and this is the third attempt.3. According to the Prosecution, the petitioner along with five others indulged in chain snatching, dacoity and theft of several persons who became the victims. One amongst them was a woman who lodged a report about the theft of Mangalya Sara and other articles. The Investigating Officer registered it and during the course of investigation, the petitioner canto to he arrested. The other accused who were arraigned as Accused NOS. 2 to 4 gave voluntary statement, which lead to recovery of several articles. Further statement of the complainant ...
Tag this Judgment!Harshitha S/O Sreekanta Vs. State by Sakaleshpura Town Police Rep. by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. In the matter relating to suicide committed by a minor Girl-Ramya, the case is under investigation in Cr. No. 30/09 on the file of Sakaieshpura Town Police Station.2. The petitioner is shown as the lone offender in the crime. He is not yet arrested and has sought for direction to the respondent-police to release him on bail In the event of his arrest under Section 438 Cr.P.C.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the materials collected by the prosecution makes no case much less a prima facie case for charge under Section 306 of the IPC.4. He drew my attention to the allegations in the complaint submitted by brother-in-law of the deceased in which he narrates how the petitioner came in contact with the victim-Ramya; developed affair with her and on her rejection of his proposal of marriage, how he tarnished her image. According to him, even if the allegation made in the complaint are to be taken as fact, it makes no case fur any action against the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Soubhagyamma W/O Gajendra Gowde @ G.K. Srinivas Vs. State of Karn ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. Petitioner is second accused in Cr. No. 34 of 2009 which is under investigation for offences punishable under Sections 366A and 120B of the IPC.2. The said crime number came to be registered and is under investigation on the report of one Smt. B. Vasanthi W/o K.R. Krahnamurthy, Superintendent, Women and Child Welfare Department, Hosur Road, Bangalore. She reported that on 11.02.2009, kumari Mangala 11 years, kumari Eshwari 16 years, kumari Anjeb 17 years, kumari Soumya 14 years and kumari Qunavathi 15 years were missing from the Crisis Intervention Centre, Hosur Road, Bangalore between 6.15 and 6.30 p.m. On the basis of the report furnished by her, immediate action was taken. A search was launched for the missing girls. On 12 02.2009, further information was received that the four girls were traced in the house of accused No. 1 by name Gajendra Kumar Gowda @ G.K. Srinivas. Since the said accused resided in the jurisdiction of Yeklahanka New Town Police Station, t...
Tag this Judgment!Veerahadraiah S/O Ramaiah Vs. the State of Karnataka by Nelamangala Po ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. Petitioner is ranked as accused No. 5 in Cr. No. 1117/08 on the file of Nelamangala Police Station which is under investigation for en offence punishable under Section 397 of IPC.2. The factual matrix of the case reveals that on a report submitted by Abdul Rehaman, who is police constable in Peenya Police Station, the case in question was registered against unknown persons on the allegation that on 1.12.2008, while he was waiting for bus at Jalahalli Cross, be noticed Tata Sumo Vehicle soliciting passengers. He boarded the vehicle to alight at Narasandra, but enroute to that place on the National Highway, a person seated in the rear side of the Sumo holding threat to his life robbed all his belongings. He specifically alleged that there were seven occupants in the vehicle. Out of two passengers, one of the occupants placed a knife at his neck while the other threatened him. They robbed him and he was thrown out of the vehicle, so also other passenger of the vehic...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Ayaaz S/O Abdula and Imran S/O Mushar Khan Vs. State by Ulsoor Pol ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-30-2009
ORDERJawad Rahim, J.1. Petitioners-1 and 2 are co-accused in Cr. No. 105 of 2009 which is under investigation under Sections 324, 506(B) read with 34 IPC on the allegation of one Mohammed Iqbal that on 15.03.2009 his sister had given hand loan to the first accused and in turn the complainant had gone to Ulsoor Market. Later when he asked them to return the money, the petitioners-1 and 2 indulged firstly in verbal altercation and then in physical assault. Both the accused are stated to have gestured with chopper directing at the legs of the complainant and also assaulted him. Their main intention appears to be to hold such threat as to endanger the life.2. The complainant received immediate action from the police and a case has come to be registered. Both the petitioners are sought to be arrested in connection with the said report. They have therefore approached this Court.3. As could be seen from the allegation itself the complainant, his sister and the accused seem to know each other ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Leelavathi S. W/O M. Bhaskar Vs. Shri Murgesh S/O Dharmalingam,
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-29-2009
Jawad Rahim, J.1. Revision under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 84/2009 dated 15-4-2009 on the file of the Judge, Fast Track Court, Bangalore.2. The matter is listed for admission. Considering the nature of the litigation between the parties, I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.3. Petitioner is the wife of the 3rd respondent M. Bhaskar. According to her, their marriage was solemnized according to the Hindu Rites. It is her case that out of valid matrimonial relationship, a daughter is born. The third respondent at the instigation of and in connivance of other respondents indulged in and committed the acts, which constitute domestic violence. He deprived her and her daughter the means of sustenance, comfort and consortium of life, because of which violent acts perpetrated on her, her life become miserable and she has no solace. Time and again, efforts were made to reason out with him. His parents and ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »