Karnataka Court February 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Omana Chetan W/O Late S.R. Chetan and Vs. S.S. Rangegowda S/O Shivappa ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-01-2008
Reported in: ILR2008KAR2240; 2008(4)KarLJ124; 2008(2)KCCR1062; 2008(3)AIRKarR264; AIR2008NOC1862; 2008CriLJNOC822; 2008(3)Crimes390; 2008(3)Crimes390
ORDERK.L. Manjunath, J.1. Short question that arises for the consideration of this Court in this writ petition is whether a widowed daughter-in-law along with her minor daughter can file a claim petition claiming maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. (sic).2. 1st petitioner is the widow of one S.R. Chetan and 2nd petitioner is the minor daughter of deceased Chetan who died in a road traffic accident occurred on 28.8.2003. 1st petitioner married Chetan on 21.2.2000 at Chickmagalur. Out of their marriage, 2nd petitioner was born. After the death of her husband, 1st petitioner along with her minor who is the 2nd petitioner has filed maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. before the Family Court at Bangalore against the respondents who are parents of deceased Chetan.3. Family Court raised an objection in regard to the maintainability of the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Family Court considering the provisions of Section 125 of Cr.P.C. came to the concl...
Smt. Santosh Achcha Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Secretary Revenue De ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-01-2008
Reported in: ILR2008KAR2413
ORDERH.V.G. Ramesh, J.1. These two petitions have been filed challenging the validity of Section 45A and Section 45B of the Karnataka Stamp Act as illegal, arbitrary and ultra vires of the Stamp Act and the Registration Act and for consequential relief.2. In WP 45953/2001, the prayer is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to register the sale deeds presented by the petitioner on 29.5.2001 which is received by the 3rd respondent.3. In WP 1992/2000, the prayer is common and also to strike down Section 45A and 45B of the Act and to declare the sale deed annexure A is properly valued and to direct the 3rd respondent to register the document according to the Stamp Act and the Registration Act and, for such other relief.4. In WP 45953/2001, petitioner has presented four documents/sale deeds on 29.5.2001 for having purchased land in Sy. No. 1/1B of Bramhapur of Gulbarga District, for registration. The 3rd respondent received the sale deeds and collected the registration fee vide P. Nos. 47,...
Motor World Limited Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-01-2008
Reported in: (2009)26VST487(Karn)
ORDERDeepak Verma, J.1. Heard Sri Indrakumar, learned Counsel for Sri E.I. Sanmathi for the petitioner. Perused the records.2. This revision is at the instance of the assessee under Section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter shall be referred to as, 'the KST Act') against the order dated October 26, 2006, passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore in STA. Nos. 2316-2317 of 2004 which were also preferred by the assessee herein against the orders of Joint Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Appeals, Bangalore Division against the order dated June 29, 2004, for the assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01 under the KST Act.3. The brief facts for deciding the said revision are mentioned hereunder:The assessee is the authorised dealer to Toyota light motor vehicles. Being the dealer, it is purchasing vehicles from M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Limited, Bangalore, for delivery of the vehicles to its respective customers. The business premises of the assessee were insp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›