Karnataka Court March 2007 Judgments

Basappa S/O Ganeshappa Gubber Vs. the Chief Manager and Disciplinary A ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioner, questioning the legality and validity of the charge-sheet dated 24.1.2006 issued by the respondent in No. PAD:DISC:340:04:2508:2005-06, vide Annexure-F and all further proceedings, in pursuance of the same as unsustainable, has presented this writ petition2. It is not in dispute that, petitioner was appointed as guardian in respect of minor children Manjula and Vijayakumar, who are the children of his sister. On account of love affair developed while studying 6th standard by Manjula the same was ended in marriage with one Sri. Kotreshi. It is the further case of the petitioner that, he has availed loan on the deposit of Smt. Manjula. Smt. Manjula on attaining the age of majority has complained with the Chairman of the respondent-Bank that, petitioner has misappropriated the amount in deposit. On the basis of the complaint given by Smt. Manjula after attaining majority, respondent-Bank has issued show-cause notice to the petitioner as to why proceed...

Ms. R. Sridevi D/O W. Raman Vs. Canara Bank a Body Constituted Under t ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2007(114)FLR368]; ILR2007KAR1147; (2007)2LLJ1067Kant; 2007(2)KCCRSN96; 2007(3)AIRKarR62; 2007IILLJ1067

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Petitioner herein assailing the correctness of the impugned communication cum order dated 10th November 2006 bearing No. PW.HOSA E9 7304 2006 KSR vide Annexure C and the impugned communication dated 28th November 2006 bearing No. PW.HOSA.E.9. 8196.2006.KSR vide Annexure F issued by the competent authority of the respondent, - Bank has presented the instant writ petition seeking certiorari or such other appropriate writ, order to direction and for grant of all consequential benefits.2. The facts of the case in brief are that, petitioner herein was appointed by the process of Direct Recruitment by respondent - Canara Bank (' Bank ' for short) to the post of 'Officer' in Junior Management Grade Scale I and by an order of the Bank dated 10th December 1998, she was appointed as 'Probationary Computer Programmer', an Officer in Junior Management Grade Scale I. Subsequently, the services of the petitioner came to be confirmed on her satisfactory completion of probationar...

Mariam HussaIn W/O. Zaheed HusseIn Vs. Syedani W/O. Late Syed Mustafa ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR2715; 2007(5)KarLJ530; 2007(4)KCCRSN235; 2007(4)AIRKarR102

N. Kumar, J.1. This is a second defendants second appeal challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below that the plaintiff has, established the agreement of sale and therefore he is entitled to the decree for specific performance,2. The subject matter of the suit is the land bearing Sy.No.51, measuring 8 acres and 30 guntas situated in Bellahalli Village, Yalahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk. The plaintiffs case is that he is in the possession, and enjoyment of the suit schedule property for more than 30 years. The defendant is none other than his elder brother. The defendant managed to secure the pahani entries in respect of the suit schedule property in his name as he was the eldest in the family. On the basis of such entries, he attempted to interfere with the plaintiffs possession. On 16.9.1978, the defendant and his children started felling the casurinatrees raised by the plaintiff in the suit schedule property. They also assaulted the plaintiff which resulted ...

Sharad Mahadev Borkar Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Principal ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner, a senior citizen having lost his land being plot Nos. 151 and 126 in Sy. No. 4/1A, on account of acquisition for formation of residential sites by the Belgaum Urban Development Authority, was allotted site No. 1467 under Scheme No. 35. It is the claim of the petitioner that the said plots measuring o-7-7 were purchased from his vendor Sri Ganapath G. Valvekar under a registered sale deed dated 19.2.1970. The petitioner further claims to have made a representation to the 2nd respondent - Urban Development Authority bringing to its notice that his family consists of three children and wife, with a request to allot another site adjacent to site No. 1467 measuring 40'x60', in response to which the 2nd respondent authority by a letter dated 28.9.2005 Annexure C promised to consider the request after the disposal of the appeal pending before this Court. According to the petitioner, there being no litigation pending as on date, the 2nd respondent wit...

Onkarappa S/O Nanjundappa, Rep. by His Gpa Holder B.M. Siddalingappa S ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner, a holder of a stage carriage permit No. 37A/59-60 for the route Bheemasamudra to Shimoga and back and Chitradurga to Rayanahalli and back was issued with a fresh Permit No. 53/98-99. On the expiry of the period of permit, the petitioner's application for renewal was allowed, by resolution dated 5.7.2004 of the RTA, Chitradurga. Aggrieved by the renewal, the 2nd respondent KSRTC filed Rev. Petition 612/2004 before the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, for short KSTAT, contending that the route in question overlaps the notified routes under the Schemes of Shimoga, Bellary and Bangalore was allowed by order dated 28th July, 2005 Annexure B recording a finding that the RTA, despite the objections of the KSRTC, did not obtain a joint route survey to ascertain as to whether the route for which the renewal of permit was sought for, overlapped the notified route, while strangely recording findings that the route overlaps the notified route...