Karnataka Court August 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.K. Venkatashiva Reddy Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribun ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2004
Reported in: AIR2004Kant458; 2005(1)KarLJ260
ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. In these petitions, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Composite order passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') in RP Nos. 828/99, 1056/99 and 1467/99 dated 31-5-2000 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the revision petitions filed by the Karnataka State Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation') and the other contesting respondents and has set aside the order passed by the Karnataka State Transport Authority (for short 'KSTA') dated 26-5-1999.2. Petitioner is the-holder of a Stage Carriage Permit bearing No. 78/98 authorized to operate on the route between Hindupur and Bangalore via Gowribiddanur, Thonddebhavi, D. B. Pura, Hesarghatta and Jalahalli and back to operate at the rate of two round trips a day. The permit has been countersigned by the State Transport Authority, Andhra Pradesh and is saved under Kolar Pocket Scheme.3. The petitioner filed an application to the second respondent for grant of...
H. Abdul Rasheed Vs. Madrasa-e-arabia, by Its Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2004
Reported in: ILR2004KAR4717; 2009(3)AIRKarR140
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The respondent was the plaintiff and Appellant was the defendant in the Trial Court. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the Trial Court.2. The plaintiff is a Wakf institution. It has filed the suit for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property from the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant is a chronic defaulter in payment of rents. It is claimed that the suit property is required by the plaintiff for its own use. The tenancy of the defendant claims to have been terminated by issuing legal notice dated 1.12.1995. Plaintiff claimed damages at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per month from 1.4.1996 until the defendant delivers vacant possession of the suit premises.3. The defendant filed written statement resisting the suit and denying the plaint averments. It is stated that there is no valid termination of the tenancy. Defendant denied that he is liable to pay damages and sought for dismissal of the suit.4...
Bangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. N. Sundaraswamy and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-05-2004
Reported in: I(2006)BC186; [2005]124CompCas373(Kar); ILR2004KAR3986; 2004(7)KarLJ402; [2004]56SCL465(Kar)
N.K. Jain, C.J.1. The appellant-respondent has filed this appeal against the order of the learned Company Judge passed in Co.P. 17/1998, admitting the petition on 2.2.99.2. The brief relevant facts as stated by the learned Counsel for the appellant are that the appellant is a company limited by guarantee incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the Act'); it is carrying on its business as a licensee under the Karnataka Race Licensing Act. Articles of Association has been framed as per Section 29 of the Act; Article 3(a) of the Articles of Association defines a Club Member as a Member of the Company for the purposes of the Companies Act and Stand Members are not members of the Appellant for the purposes of the Companies Act. Shri Naganand, for M/s. Sundaraswamy Ramdas & Anand, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-company submits that a company petition can be filed only by a contributory or a member of a company, and the respondents being stand memb...
indital Constructions Machinery Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commer ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-05-2004
Reported in: [2006]146STC164(Kar)
ORDERK. Ramanna, J.1. This revision is directed against the orders dated November 21, 2000 passed by the Spl. J.M.F.C. (Sales Tax), Bangalore, whereby the learned Magistrate rejected the objection dated April 4, 2000 filed by the revision petitioner for payment of arrears of sales tax amount to the tune of Rs. 2,21,446.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader and perused the records.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent herein initiated recovery proceedings Under Section 13(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('the KST Act' for short) for recovery of C.S.T. and Q.E. of Rs. 28,26,722 which includes penalty/interest of Rs. 2,21,446 for the assessment year 1998-99. It is submitted that as per the Central Sales Tax Act the State has no power to levy interest on the arrears of central sales tax therefore the revision petitioner has rightly filed objection before the Spl. J.M.F.C. (Sales Tax) conten...
Mandya Zilla Raithara Hitharakshana Samithi and ors. Vs. Government of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-05-2004
Reported in: 2004(7)KarLJ411
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. Mandya Zilla Raithara Hitharakshana Samithi represented by its President and 15 others have filed these PIL petitions. It is alleged that the first petitioner is a registered organisation and 2nd petitioner is the President and other petitioners are the office-bearers of the first petitioner. It is alleged that to safeguard the interest of Varuna Canal, VC Modernisation Scheme is projected by the Government. Government Order was issued on 27-3-1979 and administrative approval was given on 23-4-1979. The revised estimate of Modernisation Scheme for K.R.S. Project, Phase I was approved by the Government on 6-8-1987.2. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the estimates prepared were abnormally exorbitant and the respondents have committed financial irregularities and violated departmental rules by allotting piece works to a number of benami contractors, committing irregularities in payments and purchases made by the department and by way of which respondent...
Yellappa and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: ILR2004KAR3966; 2004(7)KarLJ449
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J. 1. Though the matter is listed for orders on I.As I and II, with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties it is taken for final disposal and disposed of as under:2. I have heard Sri Chandrashekar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the impleading applicant/ proposed respondent and Sri H.B Narayan, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3.3. I.As I and II are ordered as under:4. I.A. I is an application filed for impleading the applicant who is a member of the 4th respondent Municipal council himself as party respondent to this Writ Petition and I.A. II is an application filed by the proposed respondent for vacating the interim order dated 27th July, 7004 on the premise that the elections have now been scheduled to be held on 7th August, 2004; that the calender of events have already been issued on 27th July 2004, and in the circumstances it is only fair the interim orde...
K.P. Nataraj and anr. Vs. the Commissioner and Director of Food and Ci ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: ILR2004KAR4086; 2004(6)KarLJ35
ORDERManjunath, J. 1. The Deputy Commissioner, Kolar invited applications from the general public to grant authorization to run a fair price depot at Pindipapanahalli village of Sidlaghatta Taluk in Kolar District for the benefit of residents of Pindipapanahalli, Beerapanahalli and Bommanahalli villages as per notification dated 28.8.2002 which is produced as Annexure-A to the Writ Petition. Out of three villages, two villages viz., Pindipapanahalli and Beerappanahalli are situated within the Gram Panchayat of Kothanur village, Bommanahalli is included within the Grama Panchayat of Devaramallur village of Sidlaghatta Taluk. 1st petitioner as well as R-5 filed applications for grant of authorisation. Deputy Commissioner, Kolar rejected the application of 1st petitioner on the ground that he did not submit the application within 30 days from the date of notification and granted authorisation in favour of R5. Being aggrieved by the orders of the Deputy Commissioner, petitioners along with...
V. Shivananda Kumar Vs. Dr. S. Gurusiddappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: ILR2004KAR4570; 2004(7)KarLJ376
ORDERS.B. Majage, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner-complainant has requested to quash the impugned order of the learned Magistrate and also the order passed by the Sessions Court confirming that order.2. Brief facts, which gave rise to the present matter before this Court, are:Complainant became friendly with the respondent-accused - a lecturer then in Central College, who used to visit Canara Bank, where he (complainant) was working as a Clerk, and house later. With a malafide intention to deceive, the accused requested him (complainant) to arrange loan of Rs. 10 lakhs for promotion of garments business in Wilson Garden at Bangalore with a promise to return the same along with interest within 3 years and also to secure a job to him (complainant) in any Bank at U.S.A. That was believed by the complainant when the accused dishonestly induced him and as such, he arranged and paid loan of Rs. 9 lakhs to the accused on different dates. Thus, the accused cheated him by making false pro...
The Senior Divisional Manager, LiC of India Vs. the Vice President, Li ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: ILR2004KAR4748; 2004(7)KarLJ388
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this Writ Petition is, whether the remedy provided under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are unavailable to the workmen of LIC, consequent to insertion of sub-section (2) (cc), (2A), (2B) and (2C) by way of amendment to Section 48 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956.2. The facts leading to this Writ Petition are as hereunder:-One Sri N. Kesar Singh was an employee of the LIC having been appointed as a building supervisor in the year 1962. He came to be dismissed from the service on 21.5.1985 for the proved misconduct after holding a domestic enquiry under the provisions of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960. The said N. Kesar Singh raised an industrial dispute through the Union. The Central Government referred the matter to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in reference No. CR No. 72/87 which was registered on 12.1,1987. After service of...
Salarpuria Housing (P.) Ltd. Vs. Ngef Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: [2004]56SCL321(Kar)
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.Order on Company Application No. 1589/20031. This is an application filed under Rules 6, 7 and 9 of Company Rules read with Section 151 of C.P.C. by a person, who claims to have had certain agreement with the respondent-company, seeking direction to be issued by this court to the respondent-company to execute a sale deed in favour of the applicant-company pursuant to the agreement of sale dated 17-1-2002, purported to have been executed by the respondent-company.2. The application is supported by an affidavit by one Bijay Kumar Agarwal, Director of Applicant-company, inter alia stating that an agreement of sale of certain properties, belonging to the respondent-company was entered into on 17-1-2002; that pursuant to the said agreement of sale, certain amounts have been paid by way of an advance; that the respondent-company has not completed the sale transaction within the stipulated time, in spite of several requests made by the applicant. The respondent-co...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »