Karnataka Court July 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharath Timber and Construction Company Vs. State of Karnataka and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2003
Reported in: 2005(3)KarLJ525
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. W.P. No. 5467 of 2003 is filed by M/s. Bharath Timber and Construction Company, against the State as well as against Mr. Manjunatha Overseas Granites Limited, whereas W.P. No. 27874 of 2003 is filed by one Sri N.K. Shashidhar against State as well as Mr. Manjunatha Overseas Granites Limited.2. In W.P. No. 5467 of 2003, the petitioner's grievance is he is entitled to 112.26 acres of land in Sy. No. 296/1B/1 out of which he has purchased 66 acres under a registered sale deed and the remaining extent, he is holding under a lease. When the Government declared that the entire extent of land vested with the Government under the provisions of the Inams Abolition Act, the same was challenged upto the Supreme Court and it was held that it is open to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for declaration of his rights and accordingly, he has filed a suit before a competent Civil Court for declaration of his rights and accordingly, he has filed a suit before a co...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and anr. Vs. Yadava Sanil
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: 2004ACJ1162; 2003(6)KarLJ19
K. Ramanna, J. 1. Heard the learned Counsels appearing on both sides. 2. The appellant is respondent 2 in MVC No. 374 of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal IV, Mangalore (for short, the 'MACT') filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, the 'Act'). In the said claim petition, the respondent/claimant claimed total compensation of Rs. 10 lakhs from the owner and insurer of the vehicle on account of the personal injuries suffered by him in an accident that occurred on 20-4-1997. Accordingly, the MACT allowed the claim petition awarding compensation of Rs. 4,78,000/- together with interest at 6% p.a. Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment and award passed by the Tribunal, the appellant has filed this appeal mainly on the ground that though the respondent/claimant has not produced cogent evidence to prove his income, the Tribunal has come to a wrong conclusion in awarding compensation of Rs. 3,65,400/- under the head 'loss of future earnings'. 3....
State of Karnataka, by Sub-inspector of Police Vs. Vadde Yerra Venkata ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ329; ILR2003KAR3958
Saldanha, J.1. When Criminal Appeal No. 105/2003 was argued for admission by the learned Addl. SPP, we found that in respect of discharge of the other two accused that the State had filed Criminal Revision Petition and since both the proceedings arose out of a common order, we directed that Office to produce the papers in Criminal Revision Petition also. We have heard the learned Addl. SPP on merits in both the cases. 2. The principal submission canvassed is that these accused persons are habitual offenders, that the offence are not only serious in so far as they are punishable with heavy jail sentences, but more importantly the nature of the offence is such that it must be categorised as anti-social offences, which undermines the law and order situation. In this background, we do agree with the learned Addl. SPP, when he submits that it is very necessary that the Law Enforcement Machinery and the Courts must take a very rigorous view of this category of offences and those who indulge ...
Fr. Muller's Hospital, Rep. by Its Director Vs. the Member Secretary a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Kant342; ILR2003KAR5116
ORDERShylendra Kumar, J.1. Petitioners in the above Writ Petitions are either hospitals or Nursing Homes wherein health services are provided. Petitioners are charging for such services. In the course of their activities petitioners produce waste which is required to be disposed of and having regard to the nature of the activity and the use of chemicals and drugs in such activities and the waste also containing residuary wage particles generated due to treatment on patients, the disposal of such wastes is sought to be regulated by Rules known as Bio Medical Waste, (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998 (for short 'the Rules'). Such Rules are framed by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred on it under Sections 6, 8 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Every occupier of an institution generating such bio medical waste and handling of such bio medical wastes are required to obtain an authorization as indicated in Ru...
G. Rajashekar Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Kant520
ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. Matter is listed for orders. Two impleading applications are filed in addition to the one for vacating the stay. All the applications are taken up together for consideration. Petition is also taken up for final disposal with consent of the learned counsel.2. Learned counsel on either side argued both on the I. As. as well as on the mainmatter to save time....
Bahar Enterprises Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Kant416
ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. The petitioner Bahar Enterprises, a Distributor of the film by name 'Quyamat' is challenging Section 4AA of the Karnataka Entertainment Act of 1958. According to the petition averments, the petitioner had taken a Hindi Colour Feature Film 'Quyamat' from the producer of the Movie M/s Baweja Movies Private Ltd.., for distribution in various theatres. He has referred to the details with regard to his distribution. The film is ready for release and an advertisement has been issued in Indian Express fixing the date of release as 11-7-2003. According to the petitioner, there is a dispute between the Kannada Films Producers Association and the Exhibitors Association in relation to the screening of the pictures of other languages and with regard to service charges in terms of Annexure 'A', The petitioner states that Section 4AA is to be struck down and according to the petitioner, it is in violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The grounds raised in the peti...
Hoovina Huklu Estates and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka by Revenue Secre ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Kant44; ILR2003KAR3682; 2003(6)KarLJ157
ORDERRangavittalachar, J. 1. The petitioner-Hoovina Huklu Estates is a registered partnership firm. The firm represented by all the partners purchased several items of agricultural lands and coffee estates under a registered sale deed dated 27.11.1972 - Annexure-B from one DC Kothari and his family members. Later, on account of differences among the partners, the firm was dissolved by a Deed of dissolution dated 15.11.1995. This Dissolution Deed was presented for registration by paying a stamp duty of Rs. 500/-. The Sub-Registrar holding that since the dissolution deed has the effect of transferring immovable property from one partner to another, directed the petitioners to pay proper stamp duty of Rs. 6,74,5007- on the market value of the property assessed at Rs. 67,50,000/- as per Article 40C (a) of the Stamp Act. This order was questioned by filing an appeal before the 2nd respondent herein. The 2nd respondent has dismissed the appeal. These two orders are under Challenge. 2. The co...
Nanjunda Setty @ N.S. Tallam and ors. Vs. Tallam Subbaraya Setty and S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2003
Reported in: ILR2004KAR924
ORDER 7 RULE 14, ...
State Vs. H.D. Beeregowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ4762
M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. We have heard the learned Addl. SPP on I. A. I. as also on merits. As far as I. A. I. is concerned for the reasons set out the delay is condoned. I. A. I. is allowed.2. Coming to the merits of the case, obviously the State has filed an appeal against acquittal because the allegation is to the effect that the complainant Shanthamma was a 19 years old girl, that she had been raped and that she had also been assaulted. The trial Court has acquitted the accused and having regard to the nature of the charge, the order has been challenged through the present appeal.3. We need to again reiterate the fact that undoubtedly, attacks on the dignity of females of whatever age is something of utmost seriousness which the courts will visit with exemplary punishments in the social interest. It is also necessary for us to reiterate the fact that where the attack is on the modesty of the female or where it is a sexual attack that the law itself prescribes for deterrent punishment. ...
G. Ramachandran and ors. Vs. V. Doraiswamy and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2003
Reported in: ILR2004KAR3670
ORDERA.V. Srinivasa Reddy, J.1. In these revisions preferred by the tenants, the legality and correctness of the order of the court-below passed in H.R.C. Nos. 10700/91 and H.R.C. No 10701/91 are called in question. By the common order passed in them, the Court-below allowed the eviction petitions filed under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 ('the repealed Act' for short) and rejected the petitions filed under Section 21 (1)(a)(c)(d) of the repealed Act. No revision is preferred against the dismissal of the eviction petitions filed on grounds other than Clause (h) by the alleged legal representatives of the deceased landlord. I use the term 'alleged' because the petitioners very hotly dispute the claim of the present respondent in these revision petitions that she is the true legal representative of the deceased landlord.2. But before I proceed to decide the revision petitions on merits, I must dispose of plethora of IAs filed by the parties during the pendency ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »