Karnataka Court July 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mallappa and ors. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Co-op. Societies and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-2003
Reported in: ILR2003KAR2976
ORDERPatil, J.1. In these petitions, the petitioners are questioning the legality and validity of the impugned certificate dated 16.2.2001 as per Annexures D1 to D11 issued by the 1st respondent and the notices dated 14.5.2001 as per Annexures E1 to E11 issued by the 2nd respondents. 2. These petitioners are the agriculturists and availed loan fromthe 3rd respondent-Bank by hypothecating their lands for developing plantation at industrial level. Due to the failure of crops and also the failure of borewell dug by them, they have requested the concerned authorities for waiving off the loan and gave detailed representation. In pursuance of their request/representations, the concerned officers of the respondent No. 3 has visited the spot and gave report narrating the ground reality of the lands held by these petitioners as per Annexure- A,B and C respectively. Be that as it may. In view of the non payment of the instalments of the loan availed by the petitioners, the 3rd respondent has ref...
Ramappa Hanumappa Naganoor and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Sec ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-2003
Reported in: ILR2003KAR3498
ORDERPatil, J.1. The petitioners, assailing the legality and the validity of the order dated 18.9.2002 in No. CMW/74/CAP/2002 passed by respondent No. 1 vide Annexure-D, have filed this Writ Petition.2. The case of the petitioners is that they along with more than 120 members submitted an application to take action against respondent No. 3 for removal from primary membership and requested the matter to be listed for discussion in the AGM scheduled to be held on 29.9.2002. The said application was placed before the Committee in the meeting held on 29.8.2002. The committee passed an unanimous resolution to place the matter before the AGM and also to send all the copies to respondent No. 3 for his information. Accordingly, the said application was listed in the AGM for discussion at SI No. 7. The 3rd respondent filed a revision under Section 108 of the Act before the 1st respondent without impleading the petitioners or any members as parties. The 1st respondent, by its order dated 18.9.20...
State of Karnataka Vs. Narasanna
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ1973
M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. We have heard the learned Addl. SPP at length and on merits in both these appeals. The principal grievance is that even though the trial Court has convicted the accused under Section 304, Part I, I.P.C. and awarded a sentence of 7 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 3000/-, in default S.I. for 6 months, that having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case that the acquittal under Section 302, I.P.C. was unjustified. The second submission is that the facts of this case are rather gross and even if for any reason the Court were to convict under a lesser charge that the sentence awarded is inadequate and requires to be enhanced. In one of these appeals earlier the learned Single Judge had issued notice to the respondent-accused but that notice has not so far been served and consequently, we dispense with the service of notice in view of the order that has been passed by this Court.2. It is well settled law that in a case where the trial Court exercises judicial disc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›