Skip to content

Karnataka Court May 2002 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 18 2002

Prestige Housewares (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Prestige Estates and Pro ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-18-2002

Reported in: ILR2002KAR3258

V.G. Sabhahit, J. 1. This appeal under Section 72(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'Act') arises out of and is directed against the order dated 2-7-1999 passed by the Copyright Board at Bangalore in Case No. 6 of 1996. 2. The essential facts of the case in brief leading up to this appeal are as follows : The parties would be referred to with reference to their rank before the Copyright Board. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 50 of the Act on 6-7-1995 with prayers to : a) Suspend the Copyright registration No. A-51400/91 dated 25th February, 1992 obtained by the respondent. b) Revoke/cancel the Copyright registration No. A-51400/91 dated 25th February, 1992 obtained by the respondent. c) Award costs of the proceedings and pass such further or other orders as the Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thereby render justice. It is averred in the petition that the Trade Mark 'PRESTIGE' was originally registered under No. 141602 i...


May 03 2002

Ritti Vaidraj Achar and ors. Vs. the Commissioner for Hindu Religious ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-03-2002

Reported in: ILR2002KAR3363; 2002(5)KarLJ149

ORDERK.L. Manjunath, J. 1. This petition is filed by way of public interest litigation. Petitioners claim that they are the devotees of Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt of Mantralaya. In this writ petition, petitioners have requested this Court to restrain respondent 1 from recognizing respondent 3 as the successor of respondent 2 and also to restrain respondent 1 from entertaining any petitions or applications or proceedings from any one seeking recognition of respondent 3 as successor of respondent 2 and also to restrain respondents 2 and 3 from holding out, announcing or acting in any manner to the effect that respondent 3 is the successor of respondent 2 and to issue such other directions which may be necessary in the interest of justice.2. Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt is situated in Mantralaya at Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh. The Mutt has got large number of devotees not only in Andhra Pradesh but also in various States and more number of devotees are there in the States of Karnatak...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial