Karnataka Court April 2002 Judgments
K.S. Raja Educational Trust Vs. National Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-18-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)KarLJ500
ORDERA.V. Srinivasa Reddy, J.1. The petitioners in these petitions have all approached the respondent-National Council for Teacher Education ('the NOTE' for short), under Section 14 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 ('the Act' for short), for grant of recognition to the institutions already established by them or in the process of being established. The NCTE in all these cases has refused to consider their applications presented under Section 14 of the Act on the ground that the same were not accompanied by a 'no objection certificate' from the State Government. Aggrieved by the refusal of the NCTE to consider their applications, the petitioners have presented these writ petitions.2. The Act was enacted by the Central Government in 1993 and it came into force with effect from 2-9-1995. The matter of recognition of teacher education institutions was left to the National Council under Section 14 of the Act. Every existing institution and every institution proposed t...
Tag this Judgment!Mehiboobsab Vs. Upalokayukta and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-18-2002
Reported in: ILR2002KAR2535; 2002(6)KarLJ57; (2003)ILLJ148Kant
ORDER1. Sri Nagarajulu Naidu, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel is directed to take notice for respondent 3.2. Petitioner claims that he is working as Junior Engineer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, third respondent herein. On 5-11-1997 one Gopal Pandurang Pawar gave a complaint to the Police Inspector attached to Lokayukta, Bijapur, that petitioner had made a demand for illegal gratification. On the basis of the said complaint, a raid/trap was held and the petitioner was prosecuted in Special Case No. 20 of 1998 on the file of the Special Judge, Bijapur charging him with the offence of demanding and accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 250.00 for providing electrical supply to the newly constructed house of complainant's grandfather, punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Before the Special Judge, seven ...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka Vs. Jagadisha and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-18-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2141; ILR2002KAR3472; 2002(6)KarLJ405
1. We have heard the learned Additional State Public Prosecutor as also the learned Advocate who represents the respondents. The principal submission canvassed by the learned State Public Prosecutor is that the infirmities on the basis of which the acquittal order has been passed are unsustainable for the simple reason that he relies heavily on the oral evidence of the injured person as also on the evidence of P.W. 6 and the medical evidence which according to him corroborates the oral evidence. He points out that P.W. 1 has sustained fractures in the course of the injuries, that the injuries are of some seriousness and that the medical evidence is the strongest support to the credibility of the oral evidence. The contention raised is that the acquittal order is unjustified and that the same must be set aside. On behalf of the respondents-accused it is submitted that there are very serious infirmities in the prosecution case. Firstly, what is submitted is that the Investigating Officer...
Tag this Judgment!Prakash Vs. State by Kakti Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALT(Cri)109; ILR2002KAR2550; 2002(4)KarLJ54
Kumar Rajaratnam, J.1. The accused being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Trial Court in S.C. No. 135 of 1993 in convicting the accused for an offence under Section 302 of the IPC has preferred this appeal.2. The accused was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment.3. The accused is alleged to have murdered his sister Sangeeta on 12-3-1992 at about 3 p.m. The accused inflicted knife injuries on the deceased as a result of which the deceased succumbed to the injuries.4. The tragedy unfolds thus.5. P.W, 1 is the husband of the deceased. He had a house situated in Shahunagar locality, Kangrali B.K. He was living with his wife, the deceased, and children which included a child, witness, P.W. 2. The deceased and her husband were living in the 1st floor of the said building. The accused was living in the other room in the same building.6. The accused was...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Dhondiram Ganpat Motipowal ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: 2003ACJ1450; [2002(94)FLR1068]; ILR2002KAR2568; 2002(5)KarLJ40
A.M. Farooq, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Insurance Company against the award made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarding a compensation of Rs. 1,69,056/- together with interest at 12% p.a.2. Brief facts of the case are that the claimant filed an application under the Workmen's Compensation Act contending that he was the driver in motor vehicle bearing No. MH 12/708 of the first respondent, Sri Kailasa Shankar Pandarkar on a salary of Rs. 3,000/- and daily bhata of Rs. 30/-. That on 26-3-1997 when he was driving the vehicle from Belgaum to Madras and when the vehicle came near Mangutti Cross on P.B. Road, due to mechanical defect the vehicle dashed against a tamarind tree as a result of which the applicant sustained grievous injury on his right eyebrow, fracture of right leg and right knee and he also suffered other multiple injuries all over the body. He was shifted to District Hospital, Belgaum and despite best medical treatment, he couldnot recover from the d...
Tag this Judgment!Veerabhadrappa and anr. Vs. Jagadishgouda and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: ILR2003KAR3042; 2002(5)KarLJ55
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. Appellants herein were respondents 5 and 6 in Jagadishgouda and Anr. v. Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha Limited, Galagali, Biligi Taluk, Bagalkot District and Ors., 2000(3) Kar. L.J. 152 Respondents 1 and 2 herein were the petitioners, respondents 3 and 4 herein were respondents 1 and 2 and respondents 5 and 6 herein were respondents 3 and 4 in the said writ petitions.2. Late Chatura Chand Shah (father of respondents 5 and 6) was the owner of Sy. No. 61/1 measuring 7 acres 6 guntas and respondent 6 was the owner of Sy. No. 60/2 measuring 12 acres 8 guntas in Choudapur Village, Biligi Taluk, Bagalkot District. Respondent 6 sold land bearing Sy. No. 60/2 in favour of second appellant under sale deed dated 4-3-1982 for a consideration of Rs. 25,000/-. Chatura Chand Shah sold land bearing Sy. No. 61/1 to the first appellant under sale deed dated 20-10-1982 for a consideration of Rs. 25,000/-. The Sub-Repscrar, Biligi (fourth respondent), being of the opinion that docum...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Mahaboob Bee Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: 2003ACJ712; ILR2002KAR3001; 2002(5)KarLJ146
V.G. Sabhahit, J. 1. This appeal by the claimant in O.A. No. 51 of 1996 on the file of Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, is directed against the judgment dated 24-11-1998 wherein on a claim petition filed by the claimant-appellant herein claiming compensation towards the death of the husband of the petitioner-claimant (Rasool) while he was travelling by Train No. 1063 DN on 12-6-1996 averring that he fell down due to sudden jerk and succumbed to the injuries and died and applicant is also having six children and mother-in-law (the mother) of the deceased. The Tribunal after enquiry held that claimant Rasool was travelling by Train No. 1063 DN on 12-6-1996 and he sustained injury and succumbed to the injuries and died and wherefore, the applicant was entitled to compensation and as per the Schedule prevalent on the date of accident awarded compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- and apportioned the compensation between the claimant and the children.2. Being aggrieved by the said order, t...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Nanjaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3289
ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. Petitioner Sri Nanjaiah is seeking for a CBI investigation to investigate the offences said to have been committed by the accused for offences punishable under Sections 302, 384, 324, 325, 307, 364, 365, 285, 386 and 352 read with Sections 34 and 149, IPC.2. Petitioner is the father of one Dr. N. Shiva kumar. According to petition averment a gruesome murder was committed and the body was found on the railway track near Naguvanahalli, Srirangapatna taluk.Petitioner's son Dr. Shiva kumar married Kum. Prabhavathi eldest daughter of Sri Rachaiah, Inspector of Police (Traffic) attached to Devaraja police station, Mysore. Marriage took place on 28-5-2000. Smt. Prabhavathi joined here husband Dr. Shiva kumar in Bangalore. A function was arranged on 30-5-2000 by petitioner at Bangalore and on the said day Rachaiah, took along with him Dr. Shiva kumar and Prabhavathi to Mysore. Prabhavathi consumed poison at the residence of her father and the reason for the said act is ...
Tag this Judgment!K. Surendra Prabhu Vs. Canara Bank and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: ILR2003KAR3145
ORDERGururajan, J.1. Petitioner in this petition is seeking for following prayers.'(a) Quash the promotions made by the respondent 1 by memo no. 47/98 dated 25.6.98 (under Annexures K to the Writ Petition) and order bearing No. PWPM 9674 E 7 VR dated 31.12.99 (under Annexure Z to the Writ Petition) by issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari or appropriate writ, order or direction and further direct the respondent 1 to promote the petitioner to senior Management grade scale IV with effect from 25.6.98 and grant all consequential benefits including monetary benefits.(b) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the interest of justice and equity, including the award of costs of this Writ Petition.'2. Petitioner joined the services of the Bank in the year 1959. He was promoted from time to time. Certain disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him and an order was issued 1981. A petition was filed in this Court and the sam...
Tag this Judgment!Sri B.S. Dwarakanath Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2854
ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. Petitioner Sri Dwarakanath is seeking direction for a CBI enquiry in Crime N. 427/99 on the file of JC Nagar Police Station, Bangalore, on the following facts.2. Petitioner who is working as a Technical Officer incharge of storage point, Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation, Whitefield, Bangalore (for short Corporation), was issued with a show cause notice and a reply was submitted by the petitioner. Thereafter a charge-sheet was issued to him in the matter for negligence. An enquiry was conducted. Petitioner complains about the defects in the enquiry. Petitioner was imposed a penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect besides recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,01,670/- being the amount of loss alleged to have been caused by him on the account of alleged negligence on his part. An appeal was filed to the authorities. Petitioner refers to the details of the appeal procedure in paras 5 and 6. Petitioner states that the then Managing Director Sri K....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »