Karnataka Court December 2001 Judgments
Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C., Bangalore Vs. Venkataramappa K.S. and o ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ597; ILR2002KAR887; 2002(2)KarLJ345
K.L. Manjunath, J.1. This appeal is by the K.S.R.T.C. The respondents 1 to 8 presented a claim petition claiming compensation on account of death of one Shivanna who was the brother of the claimants. He died in a road traffic accident on 21-6-1994 at about 7.10 p.m. near K.E.B. Office on NH-4 at Mulbagal. He was a passenger in a bus bearing No. MYF 7365 owned by the appellant. The driver of the bus dashed the bus against a parked lorry bearing No. KA 19-3754. Due to the said accident, Shivanna died on the spot. The respondents-claimants filed a petition claiming compensation on account of the death of said Shivanna. According to them, he was aged about 30 years and was a promising agriculturist. In addition to that, he was also doing milk vending business. According to them, he was getting an income of Rs. 5,000/- per month. The Tribunal after appreciating the evidence adduced by the parties, held that the deceased was getting an income of Rs. 2,400/- per month and out of which l/3rd a...
Tag this Judgment!Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C. Vs. Venkataramappa K.S. and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: II(2002)ACC81
K.L. Manjunath, J.1. This appeal is by the K.S.R.T.C. The respondents 1 to 8 presented a claim petition claiming compensation on account of death of one Shivanna who was the brother of the claimants. He died in a road traffic accident on 21.6.1994 at about 7.10 p.m. near K.E.B. Office on NH-4 at Mulbagal. He was a passenger in a bus bearing No, MYF 7365 owned by the appellant. The driver of the bus dashed the bus against a parked lorry bearing No. KA 19-3754. Due to the said accident, Shivanna died on the spot. The respondents-claimants filed a petition claiming compensation on account of the death of said Shivanna. According to them, he was aged about 30 years and was a promising agriculturist. In addition to that, he was also doing milk vending business. According to them, he was getting an income of Rs. 5,000/- per month. The Tribunal after appreciating the evidence adduced by the parties, held that the deceased was getting an income of Rs. 2,400/- per month and out of which 1/3rd a...
Tag this Judgment!Bhoganna Vs. Managing Director, Karnataka State Road Transport Corpora ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ150
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. We have heard the appellant's learned advocate as also the learned advocate for the respondent. The principal submission canvassed before us is the fact that as per the appellant's case, the bus has caused multiple fractures to the legs, in addition 4 ribs were also fractured and, it resulted in the appellant having undergone 5 surgeries in the course of the illness. He has spent 105 days in the hospital. Though 10 years have lapsed since the date of the incident we are informed by the appellant's learned advocate that the appellant still requires treatment as some of the wounds have not been healed even at this point of time. The appellant's learned advocate has submitted before us that the Tribunal has granted a very meagre compensation where he is undoubtedly right. He also points out to us for a variety of reasons, the requisite evidence could not be led before the Tribunal and he submits that consequently, the appellant's case has gone by default and that the i...
Tag this Judgment!Ashit Shetty and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-03-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)KarLJ240
ORDERChandrashekaraiah, J.1. W.P. Nos. 9517, 10875 to 10892, 9518 and 10856 to 10873 of 1999 are filed by the persons claiming to be erstwhile landowners of the land in Survey Nos. 20 and 21 of Boopasandra Village seeking for review of the order dated 23-9-1996 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 37719 to 37725 of 1S92, W.P. Nos. 3216, 3217, 11001 and 23205 of 1993, W.P. Nos. 32221 of 1992, W.P. Nos. 15718 and 6254 of 1996.2. W.P. No, 20698 of 2000 is filed by the purchasers of sites in the above said survey numbers seeking for quashing of allotment of sites made in favour of contesting respondents by the Bangalore Development Authority, hereinafter referred to as the 'BDA'.3. The facts in this case are as follows:The State Government issued the notification dated 19-1-1988 proposing to acquire land measuring 3 acres in Survey No. 20 and 3 acres 4 guntas in Survey No. 21 of Boopasandra Village. This notice was followed by a final notification dated 29-4-1992 issued under Section 19(1) of ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›