Karnataka Court September 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.V. Jagadish Vs. Narayanappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-1999
Reported in: ILR2000KAR1981; 2000(1)KarLJ618
ORDER1. This revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for short, 'CPC' arises from the judgment and order dated 23rd December, 1995, passed by (Sri A. Mohan Ram), 14th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, dismissing or rejecting the defendant 4's application under Section 151 of the CPC moved in original suit number O.S.4223 of 1995, whereby the 4th defendant sought permission to complete the construction of the building in suit and to occupy the same.2. The facts of the case in the nutshell are that the plaintiff- respondent filed the suit for declaration of title as well as for perpetual injunction in respect of an area of 3 acres 6 guntas of land of Sy. No. 6/2, Kempapura Village, Yelahanka Hobli. He also sought decree for recovery of possession. The decree has also been sought for partition by metes and bounds.Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed an application for temporary injunction, against defendants restraining them from alienating the suit s...
K. Ngendra Kumar and Others Vs. Karnataka Power Corporation Limited an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-1999
Reported in: 2001(3)KarLJ371
ORDER1. The petitioners in these petitions are all working as Assistant Accounts Officers in the respondent-Corporation. From the inception the posts of Assistant Accounts Officers/Geologists/and Engineers carried the same pay scale. Thereafter, the respondent has amended the regulations governing the service conditions of the employees of the Corporation thereby the post of engineers is placed on a higher pay scale than the petitioners from 10-6-1988. This amendment was challenged by the petitioners and others in W.P. Nos. 7781 to 7918 of 1988 before this Court. This Court dismissed the writ petitions upholding the validity of the amendment. However, this Court has directed the Corporation to constitute an Expert Committee for the purpose of providing equal pay for equal work assessing the comparable worth of engineering and non-engineering posts.2. Consequent on this order, the respondent has constituted a committee consisting of three persons, viz., Sriyuths (1) S. Venkatesh; (2) P....
Nepc-micon Limited, Chennai Vs. Perfect Engineering (Mysore) Works, My ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)KarLJ43
ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J. 1. With the consent of the parties these writ petitions and the appeals have been heard together for final disposal. For the sake of convenience we will be referring to the parties as per their ranks arrayed in the proceedings before the Court below. 2. The petitioner/appellant is the sole defendant in Arbitration Case Nos. 3 and 4 of 1996 purported to have been filed before the Prl. District Judge, Mysore, under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('1996 Act' for short). In the said cases the plaintiff-respondent had sought for appointment of an arbitrator in terms of the Arbitration Clause and referring of the dispute to the said arbitrator. 3. The plaintiff is a proprietary concern. It had undertaken job work of bending and fabricating ''shell plates' supplied by the defendants. According to him Rs. 12,55,406/- and Rs. 33,03,738/- in two differentaccounts had fallen due to him on account of the above job work done by him for the defendants. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›