Karnataka Court June 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.M. Chengappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ612
1. This appeal assails a conviction and sentence under Section 302, IPC. The appellant before us was a Forest Guard attached to the Nagarahole National Park and the facts are slightly unusual. According to the prosecution, sometime before the incident which took place at about 4 p.m. on the evening of 30-1 -98, the accused had found a baby deer which was orphaned as a result of the fact that a poacher had killed the mother; the infant deer was taken by the accused to his own house and it appears that the accused and his family developed a very deep bond with this little animal because it further emerges that the animal was virtually nursed back to life by the accused and his wife and was thereafter being looked after by them. A few days before the incident the deer disappeared and the accused was searching everywhere for it when he is supposed to have received the information from some school children that the deer was with the deceased. He is supposed to have gone to the residence of ...
Nayak Chandrashekar Sadashiv and Others Vs. Karnatak University, Dharw ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-1999
Reported in: AIR2000Kant106; ILR1999KAR4095; 1999(4)KarLJ683
ORDER1. The petitioners in these petitions are the Members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly. In these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the notification dated 12th May, 1999, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-A to the extent it notifies that the names of the petitioners will not figure in the electoral rolls of the Senate election scheduled on 25th May, 1999.2. The facts leading to this petition are not many and are not in dispute. Universities other than Medical, Technical and Agricultural in the State are governed by the provisions of the Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Section 20 of the Act provides for the authorities of the University. The Senate, Syndicate, Academic Council, Finance Committee are some of the authorities of the University. Section 21 of the Act provides for the constitution of the Senate. Sub-clause 14 of Section 21 provides that five members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly ...
Corporation Bank Employees' Union, Mangalore Vs. Corporation Bank, Man ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-1999
Reported in: [2000(84)FLR921]; ILR1999KAR3166; 1999(6)KarLJ249; (2000)ILLJ190Kant
ORDER1. Petitioner is the recognised sole bargaining trade union of the award staff of the Corporation Bank. Second respondent organization is the sole bargaining recognised trade union of the officers working in the Corporation Bank. The employees of the bank, who are represented by the second respondent are not workmen within the meaning of that expression in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the 'Act'), nor are they members of the petitioner-union.2. Several demands made by the second respondent concerning the service conditions and welfare of the officer-employees of the bank were the subject-matter of negotiations between the representatives of the bank and the representatives of the second respondent, held on 30-10-1998 and what were agreed, have been reduced into the Minutes of the 58th Joint Meeting (Annexure-H). One of the items negotiated and settled at the said meeting was the fitment formula on promotion from the clerical cadre to officers cadre ...
Kaniyanahundi Milk Producers' Co-operative Society Limited, H.D. Kote ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-21-1999
Reported in: AIR2000Kant113; ILR2000KAR615; 2000(1)KarLJ146
ORDERThe petitioner herein being the Milk Producers' Co-operative Society, Heggadadevanakote had filed the instant writ petition with a prayer that this Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the calendar of events dated 6-5-1999 issued by the respondent 4-the Returning Officer, copy at Annexure-D to writ petition and further for issue of writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to amend the bye-law on disposal of an earlier writ petition filed by non-party Director of respondent 3-Society and further to hold the election in accordance with Section 28-A of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act.2. I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri K.L. Manjunath and Sri Jayakumar S. Patil appearing for the contesting respondent 3. The learned Additional Government Advocate Sri M.N. Ramanjaneya Gowda represented the respondent 1-State, the respondent 2-the Registrar of Co-operative Societies and the respondent ...
K.T. Laxmana Gowda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: ILR1999KAR3785; 1999(6)KarLJ273
ORDER1. Section 68 of Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 empowers the State Government to transfer to the University by an order published in the Official Gazette any of its colleges, with hostels, buildings, laboratories, stores, equipments etc. Upon the publication of any such transfer order, the transferred college becomes a college maintained and administered by the University and the properties mentioned in the order become the properties of the University. Sub-section (3) of Section 68 provides that where any college has been transferred for maintenance and control of the University by an order under sub-section (1) then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Act, all members of the teaching staff and other servants of the State Government, who were immediately before the date of publication of the order serving in or attached to the college shall stand transferred to the appropriate cadre or category of posts in the University. The grievance of the petitioners in the pre...
Raja Aliasnagaraja Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: ILR1999KAR3573; 1999(6)KarLJ235
ORDERM.F. Saldanha, J.1. The appellant who was the original accused in Sessions Case No. 65 of 1994 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, was alleged to have committed the murder of his wife Nagarathnamma at 7.30 p.m. on 2-2-1994 in a sugarcane field in Sy. No. 255/P of Kadajji Village, Davanagere Taluk. The prosecution alleged that the accused and the deceased were friendly with each other for some time and that certain incidents had taken place involving the accused whereby the deceased had run away with him and even criminal cases were regis-tered. The record indicates that ultimately the villagers took the two of them to the Police and that a decision was taken that they should be married and the marriage was solemnized in the nearby Mandir. Thereafter, the couple spent about two weeks with the sister of the deceased by the name of Rangamma at Kelagote Village. On the evening of the incident, the accused and the deceased were returning to Hiremyagalakere Villag...
H.T. Dhananjaya and Others Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: ILR1999KAR4114; 1999(6)KarLJ307
ORDER1. The petitioners herein being the contesting candidates (the petitioners 1 and 2 were also the members of the previous committee members) had filed the instant writ petition to quash the order dated 18-2-1999 passed by the respondent 2-the Returning Officer, whereby he had postponed the election indefinitely and further with a prayer that the respondent 2-the Returning Officer be directed to hold the election in respect of Kanur constituency (one of the 9 constituencies) by refixing the date of poll to complete the election process in pursuance of the calendar of events issued by him, copy as at Annexure-A to writ petition.2. I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jayakumar S. Patil. The respondents 1 and 2 are represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, Sri M.N. Ramanjaneya Gowda. The respondent 3-the Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Limited and the respondent 4-the Ex-President of the respondent 3 having been served with n...
M/S. Worldwide Traders, Bangalore Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: [2001]104CompCas245(Kar); ILR1999KAR3032; 1999(6)KarLJ512
1. The brief facts leading to this appeal and which are not in dispute are, that the appellant is a registered firm carrying on business in export of readymade garments to various countries out of India. During the course of transactions, the appellant exported readymade garments to certain foreign companies like M/s. Annick Mesh and Stitches, West Germany; M/s. J.P.G. Seige, Paris; M/s. Paradox Sports, Canada and M/s. P and C Factoring, Netherlands. These companies in spite of various reminders sent by the appellant, failed to make payments to the appellant for the goods received by them. Hence, the books of accounts of the appellant showed certain amounts as outstanding from these companies. The appellant sought permission of the Reserve Bank of India to waive the receipt of the said amounts from the foreign buyers as non-recoverable amounts, having taken steps to recover the same and that two foreign buyers and gone into liquidation. After issuing show-cause notice dated 15-4-1988 t...
World Wide Traders Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, Mi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: 1999(66)ECC517
ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. The brief facts leading to this appeal and which are not in dispute are, that the appellant is a registered firm carrying on business in export of readymade garments to various countries out of India. During the course of transactions, the appellant exported readymade garments to certain foreign countries like M/s. Annick Mesh & Stitches, West Germany, M/s. J.P.G. Seige, Paris, M/s. Paradox Sports, Canada and M/s. P & C Factoring, Netherlands. These companies inspite of various reminders sent by the appellant, failed to make payments to the appellant for the goods received by them. Hence, the books of accounts of the appellant showed certain amounts as outstanding from these companies. The appellant sought permission of the Reserve Bank of India to waive the receipt of the said amounts from the foreign buyers as non-recoverable amounts, having taken steps to recover the same and that two foreign buyers had gone into liquidation. After issuing show cause notice...
G.S. Shanthappa Vs. Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-17-1999
Reported in: AIR2000Kant138; 1999(6)KarLJ439
ORDER1. By these petitions, each petitioner has challenged orders at Annexure-B and C to these writ petitions, namely orders dated 5-5-1997, passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner in SC/ST (Appeal) 10/96-97 and in case No. SC/ST (Appeal) No. 9/96-97.2. The facts of the case in brief are that by order dated 16-2-1967, the land bearing Block No. 35 measuring 1 acre and Block No. 36 measuring 1 acre 10 guntas of Sy. No. 1 of Jarakabande Kaval, Bangalore, were granted in favour of the original respondents 3 and 4 for reduced upset price when, reduced upset price, I mean to say that, upset price was fixed at Rs. 500/- per acre, but in relaxation given under Rule 42, as the grantees belonged to Bhovi Community being classified as the Scheduled Caste, a sum of Rs. 200/- out of Rs. 600/- was waived and grant wasmade at the rate of Rs. 300/- per acre. It means original upset price was determined to be Rs. 500/- but relaxation and reduction was given in favour of the grantees being of Schedul...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »