Karnataka Court April 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. Sub-registrar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore and Ano ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-05-1999
Reported in: AIR2000Kant46; ILR1999KAR2033
ORDER1. Sri S. Udayashankar, learned AGA, is directed to take notice for first respondent (the Sub-Registrar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore).2. Petitioner claims that he had purchased Site No. 206, measuring 40' x 60' situated at Mahalakshmi House Building Co-operative Society Layout, West of Chord Road, II Stage, II Phase, Bangalore (morefully described in the Schedule to the writ petition) under a registered sale deed dated 22-1-1981 registered as document No. 5225 of 1980-81 in Book I, Volume 391, page 193 (filed in SF Vol. 103, page 107) in the office of the first respondent.3. Petitioner claims to have applied for and obtained an Encumbrance Certificate dated 21-11-1998 (Annexure-D) for the period 1-4-1980 to 20-11-1998. On obtaining such certificate, he claims to have become aware of the fact that the very same site has been sold by M/s. Co-operative Department Employees' Housing Co-operative Society Limited ('CDEHCS Ltd.' for short) in favour of the second respondent under a registered...
Kareppa Ramappa Avagodi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)ALT(Cri)201; 1999CriLJ4438; 1999(3)KarLJ543
1. The accused 1 to 3 have been convicted for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and were sentenced to imprisonment for life. Accused 4 has been acquitted by the Trial Court. Criminal Appeal No. 1116 of 1998 has been preferred by the State against acquittal of accused 4. Criminal Appeal No. 724 of 1998 has been preferred by the accused persons. Both the State Appeal as well as the appeal preferred by the accused were heard together and a common judgment is rendered.2. The prosecution case in brief is as follows:P.W. 1 is the complainant and the wife of the deceased Kareppa Poojari. P.W. 1 stated that she is the first wife and the deceased had two other wives. All of them were residing jointly. The deceased owned about 10 acres of land. About two years prior to the occurrence the deceased had given the said land for cultivation to the father of the accused Bhimappa Avagodi on the 0.25 paise share basis. The father of the accused was also entrusted with the cons...
Bilal EducatIn Society, Kamthana, Bidar Taluk Vs. State of Karnataka a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)KarLJ529
ORDER1. Bilal Education Society, for the sake of brevity referred to as 'Society1 is registered under the provisions of Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). The purpose and object of the Society is reflected in the Society's Articles and Memorandum of Association. The primary object of the Society seems to be, to impart education to the members of the minority community of Bidar District. Petitioner-Society is now managing a primary school and a B.Ed. College for women at Bidar. It appears, primary school managed and controlled by the Society is recognised and receiving salary grants from the State Government under Grant-in-Aid Code and B.Ed. College for women is affiliated to the University of Gulbarga. From its inception in the year 1981, it is alleged that the Society is managed and controlled by father and son combination by the contesting respondents. At this stage, it is suffice to observe that there seems to be rival groups fighting a bi...
Smt. Sudha V. Reddy and Others Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalor ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: ILR1999KAR3632; 1999(4)KarLJ224
ORDER1. The petitioners, in this petition, are the Trustees of Mr. Justice N.D. Krishna Rao Memorial Trust (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trust'). The Trust claims to be a public charitable trust with the object of promoting education, especially among economically backward members of society by awarding scholarships to students and other public charitable causes set out in the Trust Deed. A copy of the Trust Deed has been produced as Annexure-A. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that the Trust has constructed a Choultry or 'Kalyana Mantap on a civic amenity site allotted by the Banga-lore Development Authority at 13th Main, HAL II Stage, Bangalore, which is known as 'NDK Kalyana Mandir', and the aim of the Trust is not to accumulate any profit and the income generated from the utilisation of the Kalyana Mantap is being spent by the Trust solely for charitable purposes. 3. In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that NDK Kalyana Mantap in question is exempt...
Smt. Devatha Venkatalakshmamma Rathnam Setty Charitable Trust, Bangalo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)KarLJ545
ORDER1. The petitioner, in this petition, claims to be a Charitable Trust established for the purpose of providing for literature, scientific education, providing facilities for poor students, destitutes and orphans, amongst other objects of general public utility. A copy of the Trust Deed has been produced as Annexure-A.2. In this petition, the petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order dated 18th of February, 1998, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-L, passed by the second respondent refusing to grant exemption from payment of property tax under Section 110(b) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), and also the demand notice dated 2nd of January 1999, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-M.3. Sri Srinivas, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner is a Charitable Trust and in terms of Section 110(b) of the Act, the petitioner is exempted from payment of propert...
Sri Siddartha Education Society (Registered), Gollahalli, Tumkur Taluk ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)KarLJ707
ORDER1. A preliminary objection has been raised on the maintainability of the revision. This revision was originally filed as writ petition and it bears No. 29411 of 1998. Later on it appears to have been converted into civil revision under Section 115, it so appears under some direction of the Court. This Court had already taken the view in the case of Hungund Taluka Banjara Vidyavardhaka Sangha v Rachappa Chanamallappa and Others , and after detailed consideration has opined that civil revision under Section 115 of the CPC is not maintainable from the order of the Tribunal as Education Appellate Tribunal is not Civil Court. Later on another Single Judge Hon'ble R.V. Raveendran, J., in Panchaxari Shidramappa Yeligar v Shiggaon Taluka Shikshana Samithi and Others, has opined that in view of the unreported decision of the Full Bench in the case of Excellent Education Society v Shahida Begum, the civil revision is maintainable. The matter has no doubt been referred by me in some other ci...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›