Karnataka Court July 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Ananda Mohan and Another Vs. the Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)KarLJ507
ORDER1. The respondents 3 and 4 after obtaining the license and getting the plan approved constructed the building on premises bearing Nos. 37 and 37/1 at Richmond Road, Bangalore-560025. Since the construction put up by the respondents 3 and 4 is contrary to the approved plan and the building regulations, the proceedings were initiated by the Corporation as against the respondents 3 and 4. Ultimately, the Corporation found the respondents 3 and 4 have put up construction contrary to the approved plan and the building regulations accordingly ordered for demolition to the extent of deviation in the construction. This order was challenged by the respondents 3 and 4 by way of appeal before the Standing Committee. The Standing Committee regularised the deviation estimating the said deviation at 16.85%. This order is under challenge by the petitioners in this writ petition.2. Sri L. Govindaraju, learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that on an earlier occasion in the very proceeding...
D.N. Ramakrishnappa Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Assis ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1998
Reported in: 1998(5)KarLJ268
ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri G.R. Laxmipathy Reddy and the learned Government Pleader Sri M.H. Ibrahim. 2. The revision is confined to the short point. The question in this revision is whether it was open to the learned Civil Judge to decide the matter on merits when the parties were not present or to have dismissed it for default. In the present case, land acquisition reference was made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. On 1-7-1994 as it appeared from the order-sheet that when the case was listed, the parties to the case namely the present revisionist was absent. The learned Civil Judge passed the order as if he has passed the order on merits. 'There are no grounds made out to interfere with the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer. There is no evidence to hold that the claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation. Hence, reference rejected'.It may be mentioned here that in the earlier part of the order, it has been mentioned that.-- '...
Khoday India Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1998
Reported in: [1998]111STC783(Kar)
Ashok Bhan, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') dated October 30, 1995, passed in T.A. No. 1217 of 1994.2. Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of Indian-made foreign liquor at its factory situated at Konnayankana Agrahara, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. Petitioner had an order from Messrs United Agencies, Bombay, wholesale wine merchants, for supply of 550 cases of Peter Scot whisky of various capacities. Intending purchaser had furnished the import permit from the excise authorities of Maharashtra. Petitioner made an application to the excise authorities in Karnataka for obtaining export permit to send 550 cases of Peter Scot whisky to Maharashtra. In terms of the application, the excise authorities issued the export permit No. ECD/179/PMT/1908/92 dated August 14, 1992 to the petitioner. Petitioner made arrangements to transport the said materials t...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›