Karnataka Court April 1998 Judgments
Nyamatulla Khan Vs. Chief Officer, City Municipal Council, Savanur, Ha ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: 1998(4)KarLJ383
ORDER1. The petitioner is a President of the Town Municipal Council, Sa-vanur. 1/3rd of the total number of the members of the 1st respondent gave a notice expressing no confidence against him and requested to call for the meeting. On that notice, the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council called for the meeting fixing the date of meeting as 18-10-1997 to consider the motion of No confidence moved against the petitioner. This notice is called in question by the petitioner in this petition.2. Section 47(2) and (3) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act') provides for procedure to call for the meeting which reads as follows.-'47(2) The President may, whenever he thinks fit, and shall, upon the written request of not less than one-third of the whole number of Councillors and for a date not more than fifteen days after the presentation of such request, call a special general meeting. (3) If the President fails to call a special general meeting as provided in sub-sect...
Tag this Judgment!Padmappa Bheemappa Doddamani and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: ILR1998KAR2580; 1998(5)KarLJ233
ORDER1. The petitioners seem to be aggrieved by the notification dated 9-2-1994 (Annexure-L) issued by the respondent-Tahsildar in terms of Section 77 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') inviting applications for distribution of lands measuring 37 acres and 15 guntas in Survey No. 145 of Kulavalli village, Bylahongal taluk, Belgaum district.2. According to the petitioners their applications filed in Form 7 claiming occupancy under Section 48-A of the Act, were rejected by the Land Tribunal in respect of these very lands by order dated 31-3-1982 (Annexure-G) in No. KLR/TRB/140-265+502 on the ground of notification dated 25-4-1955 issued under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but now those lands are made available for agriculture to other intending applicants.3. If appears that Kulavalli village in Bylahongal taluk including five hamlets i.e., Machi, Didalkop, Ningapur, Sagar and Gangyanatti was an inam village granted to one Linganagowda bin Iranagowda ...
Tag this Judgment!M. Sachidanandan Vs. Assistant General Manager (Disciplinary Authority ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: ILR1998KAR3175; 1998(5)KarLJ545
ORDER1. An officer of Vijaya Bank, aggrieved by the orders of the Appellate Authority dated 10-7-1990 in confirming the orders made by the Disciplinary Authority dated 30-11-1989 is before this Court in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. While petitioner was working as an officer in the Foreign Exchange Department at Connaught Circus Branch of the respondent-Bank a show-cause notice dated 26-5-1987 came to be served alleging certain irregularities said to have been committed by him. They all relate to the events that took place during the period from 7-5-1983 and onwards. The notice was signed by one Sri S.C. Paul who was working as Assistant General Manager, International Banking Department of the respondent-Bank. The notice required the petitioner to submit his explanation within 7 days of the receipt of the notice. Petitioner filed his explanation by way of defence statement, denying all the allegations and the irregularities said to have been commit...
Tag this Judgment!Fatima Kom Mastansab Nadaf Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: 1999CriLJ1175
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. An interesting aspect of the law has fallen for determination in this appeal preferred by the mother of the original A-2 Rajesab Mastansab Nadaf who incidentally is the mother-in-law of the deceased-wife Mehboob Bi Rajesab Nadaf.2. This is one more of the wife burning cases, the death having been occurred within two years of the marriage i.e., at the beginning of June, 1994. The incident had taken place about 10 days earlier at the matrimonial home and the prosecution alleges that on 29-5-1994 the deceased was preparing to heat the water when the mother-in-law A-1 is alleged to have thrown kerosene on her clothes and set fire to her. Mehboob Biran out screaming with her clothes on fire and the neighbours extinguished the flames after which she was taken to the hospital as she had sustained extensive burn injuries about 40% of her body. Her parents were informed and they lodged the complaint with the police on 30-5-94 at about 10-30 p.m. alleging foul play. Thereupon...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›