Karnataka Court November 1996 Judgments

T.T. Chakravarthy Yuvraj and Others Vs. Principal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar M ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1997Kant261

ORDERRajendra Basu, J.1. These appeals arise out of an order made in the writ petitions filed by the appellants in which they challenged an order made by the Principal of the respondent-College expelling them from the college with effect from 20th November, 1995.2. On the allegation that on the night of 13-11-1995 at about 11.30 p.m. the bust of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar installed in front of the Academic floor of the respondent-college was desecrated, defiled and several acts of misconduct were allegedly committed by some students of the college, an enquiry was instituted. After recording the statements of 7 persons and on intimation to the students who were allegedly involved in the incident, of whom 4 appeared before the respondent, the Principal took action indicated above. Aggrieved by that action, the appellants preferred writ petitions challenging the same.3. Before the learned single Judge, the contentions urged are : (i) that the principles of natural justice have not been duly obser...

State of Karnataka Vs. M. Siddappa and Another

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1997CriLJ1610; ILR1997KAR585; 1997(1)KarLJ102

1. The instant appeal is filed by the State having been aggrieved by the judgment dt. 17-9-91, passed by the Additional Munsiff and JMFC, Srirangapatna, in C.C. No. 704/88, acquitting the respondents-accused for the offences charged under Section 92 of the Factories Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows : That the Respondent-Accused No. 1 is the occupier and the Respondent-Accused No. 2 is the Manager of the Factory - M/s. Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Karkhana Ltd., Pandavapura. On 14-3-88, one Casual Worker by name N. Swamygowda bearing Card No. 860 while on duty was instructed by Karigowda, Deputy Chief Engineer to do the grinding work at baggas elevator While he was doing the work with the assistance of the grinding machine, the said Swamygowda received electrical shock and as a result, he collapsed on the spot. That one Ramachandra wireman standing near the plug point was instructed by the deceased Swamygowda to insert two bare wires to the plug point without any safet...

Shankaragouda Tirakanagouda Hosagoudar @ Belavagi, Since Dead by His L ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1997KAR2317

ORDERChidananda Ullal, J.1. The instant petition is filed to challenge the order dated 7.11.92 passed by the Land Tribunal, Haveri, whereby the Tribunal had rejected the claim of the petitioner for grant of occupancy right in respect of 4 acres 34 guntas of land in Survey No. 67 of Haralahalli village, Haveri Taluk.2. I have heard the learned Counsel Sri F.V. Patil for the petitioners No. 1a to 1d and the learned Government Pleader Sri. M.N. Ramanjaneyagouda for the Respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri Satish R. Girji for the Respondents No. 3a to 3b. I have also perused the records.3. The brief facts of the case are that, one Shankaragouda Tirakanagouda Hosagoudar, the father of the Petitioners No. 1a to 1d had filed Form No. 7 before the Land Tribunal under Section 48-A of the Land Reforms-Act for grant of occupancy right in his name in respect of 4 acres 34 guntas in Survey No. 67 of Haralahalli village, Haveri Taluk. In the earlier round of proceedings, the Land Tribunal had granted the...

Siddeshwar and Co. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court: Karnataka

1. This miscellaneous first appeal under Section 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), arises from the judgment and order dated August 21, 1990, delivered by Sri Vittal Sheregar, Judge, the Employees' Insurance Court. Hubli, whereby the Employees' Insurance Court dismissed the applicant-appellant's application under Section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act. 2. The facts of the case in brief are, that the appellant which is a private limited company under the Companies Act has been engaged in the manufacture of steel safes and furniture. This factory of the applicant-appellant has been situated at Hubli. As per the admitted facts, the applicant's company is covered by the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act and Scheme thereunder and in which more than hundred workers and employees have been employed and have been working. According to the appellant-applicant's case, it has been remitting the contributions regularly...

Shobha Surendar Vs. H.V. Rajan and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(6)KarLJ151

ORDER1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. In view of the decision of this Court in D.C. Bhatia v Union of India, this appeal would merit acceptance and accordingly we accept the same, set aside the impugned orders of the High Court and restore that of the 'Trial Court with regard to possession of the property in dispute as well as entitlement of the appellant to contractual rent up till the date of vacating for which time is being allotted hereby to the respondents. It is ordered that the respondents may stay in possession as tenants as before uptil 31-3-1998 subject to the respondents filing in this Court within a period of six weeks the usual undertaking with regard to the payment of rent etc. The appeal stands allowed in these terms. No costs....