Karnataka Court August 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harabailu Kariappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT(Cri)119; 1996CriLJ321; ILR1995KAR3052; 1995(4)KarLJ169
Mirdhe, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants who were the accused in the trial Court against the Judgment of the Sessions Judge, Kodagu Dist. Madikeri, in S.C. No. 57/93 dt. 9th June, 1994, convicting the appellants/accused Nos. 1 & 2 for the offence punishable under Sec. 302 r/w Section 34 IPC. and accused No. 3 for the offence punishable under Sec. 109 r/w Section 302 IPC. and sentencing them to imprisonment for life. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants/accused Sri Ponnappa and the learned Addl. State Public Prosecutor Sri A. B. Patil fully and perused the record of the case. 3. The case of the prosecution is as follows : The deceased, Kushalappa, purchased 40 acres of land in the year 1978 from the father of accused Nos. 1 & 2. There was enmity, between the accused on the one hand and the deceased on the other. Near the land of the accused, the deceased had forest land where a panuvala tree had grown. The accused deceased had sold some panuvala trees f...
Mumtaz (Smt.) Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ410Kant
M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. This petition can conveniently be disposed of at this stage as both the learned advocates representing the petitioner as also the Karnataka Electricity Board have been heard completely. The grievance projected by the petitioner who is a widow of a lineman who had met with an accidental death in the year 1983, is that her application for compassionate employment has been turned down by the Board. The order of the Board, that is, impugned, is dated July 10, 1992, and states that since the death has occurred on August 23, 1983, that the application cannot be considered at this point of time. It is necessary for me to record here that the Board had promulgated a scheme for compassionate employment in deserving cases where an employee had met with sudden death, and consequently where the family was reduced to penury as a result thereof. The scheme envisaged that the application for compassionate employment of a dependent family member had to be made to the Board within ...
Mumtaz Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: ILR1996KAR77; 1995(5)KarLJ117
ORDERSaldanha, J 1. This Petition can conveniently be disposed of at this stage as both the learned Advocates representing the petitioner as also the Karnataka Electricity Board have been heard completely. The grievance projected by the petitioner who is a widow of a lineman who had met with an accidental death in the year 1983, is that her application for compassionate employment has been turned down by the Board. The order of the Board that is impugned is dated 10.07.1992 and states that since the death has occurred on 23.08.1993, that the application can not be considered at this point of time. It is necessary for me to record here that the Board had promulgated a Scheme for compassionate employment in deserving cases where an employee had met with sudden death and consequently where the family was reduced to penury as a result thereof. The Scheme envisaged that the application for compassionate employment of a dependent family member had to be made to the Board within a period of 3...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›