Karnataka Court February 1995 Judgments
N.P. Amrutesh and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Kant290; 1996(6)KarLJ464
ORDER1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the two petitioners, who are Advocates of this Court, as public interest litigation seeking the issuance of (a) writ of prohibition or order or direction against respondents 3 to 4 directing them not to exhibit Kannada film 'Kona Eedaite' (which means in English that He Buffalo gives birthto a calf), on 2-2-1995, or on any subsequent dates in any film Cinema, theatre and Celluloid for general public either in the State of Karnataka, or anywhere within the territory of India, as well as, for directing respondents 1 and 2 to take back/withdraw the certificate/permission for exhibition of the aforesaid Kannada Film and for costs.While, moving the writ petition, the petitioners also prayed for an ex parte interim order directing respondents not to exhibit the film on 2-2-1995 or on subsequent dates pending decision or disposal of this writ petition by the Court after witnessing and examining finding...
Tag this Judgment!R.S. Shyamala and Other Vs. G. Rajasekhar and Other
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Kant228; II(1995)DMC273; ILR1995KAR938; 1995(3)KarLJ170
ORDER1. Civil Petition No. 191/94 is filed by the husband praying for withdrawal of M.C. No. 593/93, on the file of the Principal Family Court,'Bangalore, and to transfer the same to the court ef IInd Additional civil Judge, Mysore, where another M.C. No. 56/91 is pending and to try both the cases together. C.P. No. 520/ 93 is filed by the wife praying to withdraw M.C. No. 56/91, on the file of the IInd Additional Civil Judge, Mysore, and to transfer the same to the Court of Principal Family Court at Bangalore for being clubbed with M.C. No. 593 of 1993, on the file of the Principal Family Court at Bangalore for a common trial.2. The facts very briefly are that the marriage between the parties took place on 20-5-1974 at Bangalore. After the marriage the wife began to live with the husband at Mysore. They have two children. Children are in the custody of the husband. Due to matrimonial differences the wife was obliged to leave the house of the husband at Mysore on 4-2-1991. The husband ...
Tag this Judgment!C. Gargaiah S/O Late Chickveeraiah Vs. the Deity Sri Shani Mahatama
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Kant287; ILR1995KAR942; 1995(3)KarLJ175
ORDER1. Heard. The order passed by the First Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in I.A. No. 52 in O.S. No. 45/88 has been challenged by the first defendant-petitioner in this petition.2. The facts very briefly are :--The plaintiff filed an application under O. 26, R. 10A, C.P.C. for appointment of an Handwriting Expert as a Commissioner to give opinion on the thumb impression and the signatures to be found in Ex.D-82(a)(3) and (4) and also Ex.D-82(b) and further to compare the same with the signature found in Ex.D-53.3. The trial Court after elaborately setting out the reasons has allowed I.A. No. 52, application made by the plaintiffs for appointment of an Handwriting Expert to compare the signatures.It is averred that plaintiffs' father established a family temple and the defendants have no right whatsoever over the temple. The contention of the defendants was that it is not disputed that the temple was established by the father of plaintiffs 2 and 3. However...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka Vs. Sririyappa Alias Sree Ram
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)ALT(Cri)617; 1995CriLJ2304; ILR1995KAR972; 1995(3)KarLJ189
ORDER1. The State has challenged the correctness and legality of the order dated 15-12-1990 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bellary in Cr. A. No. 107/1988. 2. The facts are that the respondent was prosecuted for offences under Sections 324 and 326, I.P.C. before the J.M.F.C., Siruguppa in C.C. No. 734/1987. The learned Magistrate convicted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 324 and 326, I.P.C. and released him under bond for good behaviour under Section 4, of the Probation of offender Act, 1958, (for short the Act). The matter was taken in appeal before the learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge upheld the order holding that the benefit of Section 4, of the Act was available to the respondent as the offence under Section 326, I.P.C. was not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The learned Sessions Judge negatived the contention of the State to the contrary in adopting that view. Hence, the State has come in revision before this Court...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Patramma and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)KarLJ653
1. An aspect of crucial importance has been projected in the course of this appeal. The proceeding was one under the Workmen's Compensation Act where the death had occurred and the widow of the deceased who was the driver of a vehicle, had applied for compensation. In the course of the proceeding, the matter was referred to the Lok Adalath for a speedy adjudication and the Lok Adalath after hearing the parties recorded that the case, had been compromised for a sum of Rs. 59,735/- Subsequently, when the matter came up before the authority a submission appears to have been made on behalf of the claimant that the figure is not acceptable and that consequently the matter should be heard on merits. The authority recorded some evidence which consisted of the statement of the wife of the deceased who deposed to the fact that he was being paid a salary of Rs. 900/- per month and on the basis of this figure, the authority adjudicated the matter and awarded a sum of Rs. 78,088/-. It is this awar...
Tag this Judgment!Thippanna and anr. Vs. Hanumantha and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: 1996ACJ231; 1995(3)KarLJ641
1. Heard learned advocates on both sides. 2. This appeal which has been preferred by the owner and insurance company is directed against an award in M.V.C. No. 501 of 1991 which has been made by the M.A.C.T., Shimoga. The incident in question took place on April 27, 1991 when the wife of the claimant, by name Sunkamma and her infant child were travelling by an auto-rickshaw bearing No. CTS 8127 which collided with a bus. In the incident that ensued, the auto-rickshaw turned turtle, the wife of the claimant was trapped under the vehicle and the record indicates that she died on the spot. The child was also thrown out and was hospitalised and died after one week. The present claim petition, however, is confined for some strange reasons to compensation in relation to the death of the wife only. The claimant is the husband who was aged 25 years. He had submitted that his wife was 18 years old when the incident happened, that she was working as a basket weaver and earning about Rs. 500/- to...
Tag this Judgment!Shivanna Vs. Rajasekharaiah
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR668; 1995(3)KarLJ181
ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. Petitioner-tenant has challenged the impugned order of eviction passed against him under Clause(a) of Section 21(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter, 'the Act' for short) by the Chief Judge of Small Causes Court, Bangalore City.2. The tenanted premises bearing No. 179, 6th Block, Rajajinagar, Bangalore was owned by late J.C. Nanjunda Aradhya who was a school teacher. He was a patient of cancer. He died on 31.1.1981 leaving a registered will dated 19.1.1981 (Exhibit P-8). In this Will he appointed his brother J.C. Mariyappa as the Executor. The Will inter alia states that the testator had agreed to sell the tenanted premises to the respondent who is his nephew being the son of his another brother and had already received a part of the consideration. In the said Will he authorised the executor Mariyappa (PW-2) to execute the sale deed in a part performance of the agreement and out of the outstanding consideration a sum of Rs. 20,000/- be spent ...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Mrs. V. Ambujakshi Vs. Bangalore University
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR1310
ORDEREswara Prasad, J1. At the stage of admission both the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents were heard and the Writ Petition is disposed.2. The petitioner filed this Writ Petition by way of Public Interest Petition, complaining that the first respondent-University has grossly violated the Regulations and the recommendations of the Medical Council of India and Graduates Medical Council by issuing Annexure-D, the time table scheduled to commence all the examinations for MBBS Course from 23.2.1995 onwards. She challenges the fixation of the dates of examinations as arbitrary, without application of mind and illegal. The petitioner claims interest in the proper conduct of the affairs of the respondent-University and the Medical Education.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Mohan Rangam strenuously contended that the commencement of examinations for the first and the second year MBBS students on 23.2.1995 is contrary to the Me...
Tag this Judgment!Thippanna Vs. Hanumantha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR2218
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. Heard learned Advocates on both sides.2. This Appeal which has been preferred by the owner and Insurance Company is directed against an award in M.V.C.No.501/1991 which has been made by the M.A.C.T. Shimoga. The incident in question took place on 27.4.1991 when the wife of the deceased by name Surikamma and her infant child were travelling by an Auto Rickshaw bearing No. CTS.8127 which collided with a bus. In the incident that ensued, the Auto turned turtle, the wife of the claimant was trapped under the vehicle and the record indicates that she died on the spot. The child was also thrown out and was hospitalised and died after one week. The present Claim Petition however is confined for some strange reasons to compensation in relation to the death of the wife only. The claimant is the husband who was aged 25 years. He had submitted that his wife was only 18 years old when the incident happened, that she was working as a Basket Weaver and earning about Rs. 500/- to ...
Tag this Judgment!Thippanna and ors. Vs. Hanumantha and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: II(1995)ACC618
M. F. Saldanha, J.1. Heard learned Advocates on both sides.2. This Appeal which has been preferred by the owner and Insurance Company is directed against an award in M.V.C. No. 501/1991 which has been made by the M.A.C.T. Shimoga. The incident in question took place on 27.4,1991 when the wife of the deceased by name Sunkamma and her infant child were travelling by an Auto Rickshaw bearing No. CTS 8127 which collided with a bus. In the incident that ensued, the Auto turned turtle, the wife of the claimant was trapped under the vehicle and the record indicates that she died on the spot. The child was also thrown out and was hospitalised and died after one week. The present claim petition however is confined for some strange reasons to compensation in relation to the death of the wife only. The claimant is the husband who was aged 25 years. He had submitted that his wife was only 18 years old when the incident happened, that she was working as a Basket Weaver and earning about Rs. 500/- t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »