Karnataka Court December 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parvathareddy Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-05-1994
Reported in: ILR1995KAR1856; 1994(5)KarLJ186
Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. The petitioner has filed this Petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution seeking the following reliefs:Quashing of Annexure-B, that is, the notification No. CMW 25 MDS. 91(11) dated 28.6.1992, issued by 1st respondent - State of Karnataka, whereby the State of Karnataka, has amalgamated the two market committees of Saidapur Market Area and Yadgir Market Area into one bearing the name of one of the Market Committees, namely, Yadgir Agricultural Produce Market Committee.Before I proceed further, I think it proper to mention that an application was moved on behalf of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Yadgir, Gulbarga District, through its Secretary, for its impleadment as Respondent No. 3. I have allowed that application after having heard the Counsel for the parties vide my order dated 12.5.1994, thereby, the learned Counsel carried out the amendment by incorporating the name of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Yadgir, Gulbarga District, ...
Rangachar Vs. Siddalingamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-02-1994
Reported in: ILR1995KAR577; 1995(2)KarLJ331
Saldanha, J.1. Heard Counsel.2. This First Appeal has been preferred by the original plaintiff in O.S.No. 14/1993 on the file of the learned Prl. Civil Judge, Bangalore. The Appeal assails the correctness of a judgment dated 17.11.1994 whereby the plaintiff's suit for partition has been dismissed.3. The learned Advocate who represents the appellant has advanced the submission that the plaintiff had demanded a one half share in the self acquired properties of the husband of the defendant who is the plaintiff's late brother. Briefly stated, the plaintiff's case was that the properties in respect of which the partition is demanded and the share is claimed consisted of joint family properties and acquisitions made out of the income from those properties and that ipso facto, the plaintiff, as a member of the H.U.F., was entitled to a one half share in the same. The contention is put forward that as normally happens, the revenue records stood in the name of the elder brother whom this Court ...
Ganapathi P. Hegde Vs. General Manager (Fpu), Karnataka Agro Industrie ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-02-1994
Reported in: ILR1995KAR427; 1994(5)KarLJ177
ORDERSaldanha, J. 1. This Petition is one more of those cases where an employee was sought to be deprived of the normal security and benefits attached to a post by having resort to certain sharp practices. The fact that the respondents are a public sector Corporation only worsens the situation and it is a matter of great regret that such bodies which should normally set an example as model employers are guilty of such indiscretions. The petitioner was appointed as a Sales Personnel by the respondent-Corporation on 26.9.1986. He has specifically averred that this was a permanent vacancy which fact has been refuted by the Corporation which contends that it was entitled to employ the persons on contract basis. Undoubtedly, the appointment letter does state so and this factor is relied upon and very heavily by the respondents who contend that it was a short term contract renewable from year to year if the Corporation so desired and if the petitioner's services were required. That the petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›