Karnataka Court September 1992 Judgments
Smt. Kamalabai and Others Vs. Vithal Prasad Co. (Pvt.) Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-1992
Reported in: [1993]77CompCas231(Kar); ILR1992KAR3691
Kedambady Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This is a company petition filed by the petitioner under section 155 of the Companies Act for rectification of the register of members of the respondent-company, directing the respondent-company to effect the transfer/substitute the name of petitioner No. 1 in place of her deceased husband Channabasappa and the declare that petitioner No. 1 is entitled to the benefits and profits of the company. 2. The facts of the case speak eloquently. The respondent is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is a private limited company with the object of purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in all kinds of oil, lubricants, petrol and petroleum products. The first petitioner's husband and the father or petitioners Nos. 2 to 7 Mr. Channabasappa was one of the director-members and a shareholder of the respondent-company. He died on August 16, 1988, leaving behind him the petitioners, the legal heirs. Petitioner No. 1 after the de...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-1992
Reported in: [1994]206ITR220(KAR); [1994]206ITR220(Karn)
ORDER--Applicability--Appeal to first appellate authority--Revision under s. 263 against that part of assessment order.Held :The CIT has no power in revision under s. 263 of the IT Act, 1961, to go into the questions not covered by the AAC in appellate proceedings and the doctrine of merger applies with respect to the entire assessment order.--CIT v. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (1986) 157 ITR 315 (Karn)(FB) followed. Application :Also to current assessment years.Note :The Supreme Court has granted special leave to the department to appeal against this judgment vide (1993) 201 ITR (SC) 42 (Ed.)Income Tax Act 1961 s.263 ...
Tag this Judgment!B.H. Rangaswamy and B.H. Jalajakshi Vs. Mysore Arts and Wood Works
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-1992
Reported in: ILR1992KAR3632; 1992(4)KarLJ521
Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. Regular First Appeal No. 780/88 arises out of the suits filed by B.H.Rangaswamy and another, originally as O.S.No. 350/75. This O.S.350/75 later came to be numbered as O.S.No. 850/80.The other Appeal - R.F.A. No. 781/88 arises out of the suit filed by Smt. B.H.Jalajakshi as plaintiff, originally as O.S.No. 351/75. This O.S.No. 351/75 later came to be numbered as O.S.No. 849/80.2. In the suit filed by Rangaswamy and another, the schedule property described in the plaint measures about 65ft x 117 ft. The suit is filed for a direction to the defendants to pay the current and future mesne profits at a rate determined by the Court. In addition, there is also a prayer that the defendants shall pay a sum of Rs. 33,752/- to the plaintiffs. The liability of the defendants - was - stated as joint and several, as per Para 11 of the plaint.3. The relevant facts are that the plaintiffs by series of transactions became the purchasers of. the property described in the schedul...
Tag this Judgment!Chaya Vs. K.G. Channappa Gowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-22-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ767
ORDER1. This Criminal Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner under section 397, Cr.P.C. against the order dated 25-10-1989 passed by the Prl. Sessions Judge, Shimoga in Cr.R.P. No. 12/89 setting aside the order dated 11-1-1989 passed by the Munsiff and J.M.F.C., Thirthahalli in C.Misc. No. 24/86.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent fully and perused the records of the case.3. The petitioner filed a petition under section 125, Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance for her minor child Chaya. The petitioner examined PWs. 1 to 4 on her behalf and got exhibited Exs. P1 and P2. The respondent got examined himself as PW 1 and closed his evidence. After hearing both sides the learned J.M.F.C., Thirthahalli allowed the petition of the petitioner and granted maintenance of Rs. 200/- to the minor child Chaya and he also directed that out of this amount. Rs. 100/- to be deposited by the guardian of the child in the bank. Being aggrieved by ...
Tag this Judgment!Food Corporation of India Vs. Central Co-operative Wholesale Stores Lt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-22-1992
Reported in: ILR1992KAR3443
K.A. Swami, Ag. C.J.1. This Appeal is preferred against the Judgment and decree dated 15th December 1980 passed in R.A.No. 4 of 1979 by the District Judge, Uttar Kannada, Karwar, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 30th March 1979 passed in O.S.No. 4 of 1977 by the Civil Judge, Uttar Kannada, Karwar.2. This Second Appeal came to be admitted on 4.9.1981 to consider the following question of law:'Having regard to the facts and circumstances established in the case whether the finding on Issue No. 9 is justified in law.'On 8th July 1991, when the Appeal came up for hearing, Murlidher Rao, J; (as he then was), having regard to the importance of the question of law involved in the case, has referred it to a Division Bench. The Order referring the Appeal to a Division Bench reads thus:'The question that arises for consideration is: Whether in a suit filed by the Food Corporation Of India, whether the plaint signed by District Manager can be construed as valid in view of the provisions u...
Tag this Judgment!Bhaga Vs. G.M., Ksrtc and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-21-1992
Reported in: 1(1994)ACC503
B.N. Krishnan, J.1. Though this matter is listed for admission it is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel on both sides.2. The appellant was the claimant before the Tribunal and she has sought for recovery of compensation in respect of injuries sustained by her in motor vehicle accident involving B.T.S. bus No. MEF-1033 on 14.3.1989. The Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 34,000/- and being aggrieved by the inadequacy of the compensation awarded, the claimant has preferred this appeal seeking enhancement of the same.3. The evidence led by the claimant indicates that she has suffered fracture of the lateral malluolus and dislocation of the right shoulder and she was an in-patient in the hospital from 14.3.1985 to 1.4.1985. The evidence of the Doctor coupled with Ex. P-106 which relates to the examination of the claimant as late as 6.12.1990 indicates that these disabilities had continued even as on that date and the movements dorsi flexion and plantar ...
Tag this Judgment!S. Sumitra Vs. the State and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Kant108
ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution has challenged the orders made by the Special Deputy Commissioner for Inams Abolition, Tumkur, as per-Annexure-G and the Land Tribunal, Tumkur, as per Annexure H and she has sought for quashing the same for the reasons set out in the writ petition.2. The undisputed facts as disclosed in the pleadings are as follows :--3 acres 13 guntas of land in Sy. No. 192 situated in Tumkur Amanikere, Tumkur Taluk and District, was originally owned by one Smt. Lakshmidevamma, the great grand mother of the petitioner herein. According to the geneology at Annexure-A, the petitioner Sumitra is the daughter of T. K. Siddanarasaiah, grand son of Lakshminaranappa whose elder brother's son Karigiraiah's wife is Lakshmidevamma, the donor. Thus, the petitioner is the descendant of the said Laxmidevamma. Laxmidevamma had intended to gift the land in favour of Sri Laxminarasimha Swamy Devaru, the temple of which is situate...
Tag this Judgment!A.V. Dharmasingh and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by the State Pu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ94; ILR1992KAR3137; 1992(4)KarLJ336
ORDER1. Criminal Petition 959/92 is filed by the petitioners who are accused in Crime No. 70/92 of Ashoknagar Police Station, Gulbarga and Criminal Petition 1064/92 is filed by the petitioner who is accused in Crime No. 84/92 of Madikeri Town Police Station. Both these petitions have been placed before this Bench for disposal as per the orders of the acting Chief Justice. Since both these petitions involve common questions of law, I have heard them together and I am passing a common order in them.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Govt. Pleader for the respondent and perused the records of the case.3. In Criminal Petition 959/92 the petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 70/92 of Ashoknagar Police Station which is registered for the offence punishable under section 17 of the Narcotic Drugs Act on the allegation that on credible information the police went to the spot and found the petitioners transporting 40 Kgs. of ganja and they were caught red-...
Tag this Judgment!Mahadev Satappa Kumbar Vs. Shankar Ramegowda Patil
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-1992
Reported in: ILR1993KAR79; 1992(4)KarLJ126
ORDERM. Ramakrishna, J. 1. In this Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has called in question the legality and correctness of the order, Annexure-A, made by the Taluk Executive Magistrate, respondent-3 herein and has sought for quashing the same on more than one ground. 2. A few facts that are necessary for the disposal of this Writ Petition are as follows:- The undisputed facts as disclosed from the pleadings are that respondent-1 is the owner of land bearing Sy.No. 24/4A measuring 1 acre 23 guntas of Lakhanpur village, Chikodi Taluk, Belgaum District. He mortgaged this land by a registered mortgage deed dated 4-4-1972 in favour of the petitioner for Rs. 2,000/- and pursuant to the mortgage, the petitioner was put in possession of the property. Subsequently, however, during the subsistence of the mortgage, respondent-1 executed a simple mortgage on 20-5-1974 in favour of respondent-2 by raising a loan of Rs.3,000/-. There are entries in the Rec...
Tag this Judgment!Kalappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-1992
Reported in: ILR1993KAR776; 1993(1)KarLJ334
ORDERShivappa, J.1. The petitioners are seeking bail after having been unsuccessful before the Court of Session, Kodagu District. Petitioners and one Chikkamma, wife of the deceased Rangaswamy were arrayed as accused persons in S.C.23/91 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Madikeri for offences under Sections 302, 301 r/w. Section 34 l.P.C. Chikkamma was enlarged on bail. The accused persons and the deceased Rangaswamy were all Class IV employees in the Court of the C.J.M, Madikeri.2. The case of the prosecution is that Accused No. 1 committed the murder of the deceased by inflicting injury on the head, petitioners 2 and 3 removed the dead body to a place called 'Raja Seat' with an intention to cause disappearance of the dead body. The motive for the murder being that the petitioners had illicit connection with the wife of the deceased, namely Chikkamma and that the deceased was resisting it. The scene of occurrence was in the Court premises, the motive for murder was illicit connection...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »