Karnataka Court August 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Pushpalatha Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and An ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)KarLJ492; (1993)IILLJ1061Kant
K.A. Swami, Actg. C.J.1. This writ appeal is preferred against the order dated August 23, 1991 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 25581 of 1990. Learned single Judge has rejected the writ petition holding that the petitioner does not fall within the ratio prescribed under Section 19 of the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for the post of Supervisor.2. Seven vehicles belonging to the ex-employer of the appellant were required under the Act. Sub-section (3) of Section 19 of the Act prescribing a ratio of 0.1 for each vehicle acquired under the Act in respect of the post of Supervisor. According to the case of the appellant she was working under her ex-employer M/s V. T. Raibagi Motor Service, Gajendragad, as Supervisor-cum-Clerk. The ratio prescribed for the post of Supervisory staff and managers and also for Ministerial and Secretarial staff was 0.1 per vehicle. Section 19(3) of the Act came up for consideration befo...
Pushpaiatha Vs. Vice-chairman and Managing Director, Ksrtc
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: ILR1992KAR2685
ORDERK.A. Swami, Ag. C.J. 1. This Writ Appeal is preferred against the order dated 23-8-1991 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP. No. 25581 of 1990. Learned Single Judge has rejected the Writ Petition holding that the petitioner does not fall within the ratio prescribed under Section 19 of the Kamataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for the post of Supervisor. 2. Seven vehicles belonging to the ex-employer of the appellant were acquired under the Act. Sub-section (3) of Section 19 of the Act prescribed a ratio of 0.1 for each vehicle acquired under the Act in respect of the post of Supervisor. According to the case of the appellant she was working under her ex-employer M/s. V.T. Raibagi Motor Service, Gajendragad, as Supervisor-cum-clerk. The ratio prescribed for the post of Supervisory staff and Managers and also for Ministerial and Secretarial staff was 0.1 per vehicle. Section 19(3) of the Act came up for consideration before a...
M. Yellappa Vs. the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-03-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT(Cri)174; 1993CriLJ388; ILR1993KAR977; 1992(3)KarLJ763
1. The accused-appellant has challenged his conviction for the offence under Section 302, IPC and sentence for life imprisonment for having committed murder of his wife Parvati on the might of 28/29-1-1990 in his house by assaulting her with a grinding stone, throttling and also pressing her neck with a spoon. 2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is that the accused was not treating his deceased wife well. There used to be earlier ill-treatment and it was his mother-in-law P.W. 2 who had made arrangement for his residence by taking a house on rent near her own house. The accused was a tailor by profession but round about the time of this incident he had not work at all. On the night of this incident the accused and the deceased with their child took food and both of them slept. At about mid-night time he committed the murder of his wife by assaulting as stated above and went to Kempegowdanagar Police Station and made a confessional statement before the Sub-Inspector of Police - P.W. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›