Karnataka Court January 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abbubaker Beary Vs. Tahsildar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-06-1992
Reported in: ILR1992KAR1779; 1992(2)KarLJ125
ORDERN.D.V. Bhat, J. 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 27.8.1991 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Kundapur, in No. LRY.SR.2/91.92.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this Writ Petition briefly stated are as under :Petitioner Abbubaker Beary claimed occupancy rights under Section 38 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in respect of the dwelling house and land appurtenant to it in Sy.No.102/2A before the Land Tribunal, Udupi. The Land Tribunal, Udupi, by its order dated 22.7.1985 rejected his application for the reasons reflected there. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioner preferred Writ Petition No. 2125/1986 before this Court and the said Writ Petition was transferred to the Land Reforms Appellate. Authority. The said Writ Petition which was converted into an appeal before the Land Reforms Appellate Authority was numbered as LRA 791/1988. The Land Tribunal - appellate authority by its order dated 6.4.1989 rejecte...
Syndicate Bank Vs. Vittal Bhat
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-1992
Reported in: ILR1992KAR991
ORDERM. Ramakrishna, J.1. This Revision Petition is directed against the order made by the learned Civil Judge, Udupi, on 31-5-1989 in case No. Ex. 73/87 (O.S. No. 34/85) transferring the said execution case to the Court of the Munsiff, Udupi, in view of the amendment to the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, by the Karnataka Civil Courts Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989 (Karnataka Act No. 13 of 1989) which provided pecuniary jurisdiction up to fifty thousand to the Court of the Munsiff. Hence this Petition.2. The Revision Petitioner, Syndicate Bank, was the plaintiff in O.S.No. 34 of 1985 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge, Udupi. The suit was decreed and the decree was sought to be executed in Ex.No. 73 of 1987. During the pendency of the execution proceedings, the amendment in question has come into force altering the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Civil Courts. The relevant provision for the purpose of this case is Section 4(1) (b) of the amending Act of 1989. It reads:'4. Transfe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›