Karnataka Court February 1990 Judgments
Sri Tirupathi Plastics Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-05-1990
Reported in: 1990(27)ECC92
ORDERM.P. Chandrakanthraj Urs, J.1. The petitioner is a partnership firm carrying on its business at Bangalore, a small-scale industry engaged in the manufacture of plastic bangles and moulding articles. They imported certain consignments of raw material and invoice value was shown at U.S. $650. The correctness of the valuation was questioned by the Customs Authorities at Bangalore (respondents 1 and 2). They issued a show cause notice to the petitioner calling upon him to show cause why the invoice value should not be raised to $4000 as other importers of the same raw material had shown the value ranging from $1600 to $4000. Aggrieved by such a show cause notice, petitioner approached the Appellate Tribunal. Appellate Tribunal found in his favour and fixed the value of the goods at U.S. $750. An appeal filed by the Department to the Supreme Court did not meet with success. Thereafter when the petitioner called for release of the goods to him on paying the customs duty at the value fix...
Tag this Judgment!Adiveppa Shivappa Mattur Vs. Tahsildar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-02-1990
Reported in: ILR1990KAR879; 1990(1)KarLJ399
K.A. Swami, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is filed against the order passed in W.P. No. 10053/1983. In the Writ Petition, the petitioners (appellants herein) sought for quashing the order dated 30th March 1982 passed by the Tahsildar, Shirahatti in WIN.PSR. 74. That order was passed in the purported exercise of the power under clause (b) of Sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961 as amended by Karnataka Act No. 13/1978 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition on the ground that as the regrant proceeding is pending, the petitioners are not entitled to protect their possession. The learned Single Judge has also followed his earlier decision dated 24-7-1985 in W.P. Nos. 15040 and 15041/1981, Rama Reddy v. Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.. The reasoning of the learned Single Judge is that the pendency of the regrant proceedings cannot be pleaded as a just cause to obstruct the summary eviction under...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›