Karnataka Court May 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J Adiveppa Babappa Hulasera Vs. Divisional Forest Officer
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-23-1988
Reported in: ILR1989KAR1228; 1988(3)KarLJ211
K.A. Swami, J.1. At the stage of preliminary hearing, learned Government Pleader was directed to take notice for respondents. Accordingly, Sri Udaya Shankar, learned Government Pleader has put in appearance for the respondents and has also secured the instructions. As these petitions can be disposed of at this stage, Rule is issued and they are heard for final disposal.2. In these Writ Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution the petition under have sought for a direction to Respondents 1 and 2 (the Divisional Forest Officer, Belgaum Division, Belgaum and the Range Forest Officer, Golihalli Taluk, Khanapur, respectively) to permit the petitioners to cut and remove the trees standing on the lands granted to them after depositing the market value of the trees as required by Rule 11(4) of the Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Land Grant Rules'). They have also sought for a declaration that permission as required under Sub-section (4) of Sect...
R.L. Jalappa Vs. Delhi Police Establishment
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-12-1988
Reported in: ILR1988KAR1613; 1989(3)KarLJ236
ORDERDoddakale Gowda, J.1. In this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., petitioner has sought to admit him to anticipatory bail in Crime No. RC.2/87/SIU/II/SIC/CBI registered for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of I.P.C. in connection with the alleged murder of an Advocate by name Abdul Rasheed of Kerala State.2. The circumstances under which petition is filed for grant of anticipatory bail run thus :-Sriyuths P. Sadashivan, Mariyappa, K.R. Srinivasan, Charian and Smt. Sadamba Rao were the Trustees of an Educational Society known as 'Javahar Bharati Education Trust' in Bangalore, of which, Sri P. Sadashivan was the founder-trustee. By obtaining sanction of the Government of Karnataka, Trust started a B.Ed, College, known as 'Sanjay Gandhi College of Education' in Bangalore. Smt. Rathna was its Principal. Owing to some differences Sriyuths Mariyappa and K.R. Srinivasan have fallen out and it appears there are constant bickerings amongst them.3. Sri P. Sadashivan established another T...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-1988
Reported in: (1988)71CTR(Kar)156; [1988]174ITR340(KAR); [1988]174ITR340(Karn); 1988(2)KarLJ76; [1988]40TAXMAN31(Kar)
S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question of law has been referred to this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the provisions of accrued leave salary is an admissible deduction to arrive at the assessable profits of the assesses-company ?' 2. The question arises in the following circumstances : The assessee is a public sector undertaking. In its profit and loss account for the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70, the assessee had debited on account of accrued leave salary of its employees, the sums of Rs. 27,46,717, Rs. 29,68,630 and Rs. 34,90,254, respectively. The Assessing Officer, while allowing the actual payments, disallowed certain amounts as they were only provisions and not an accrued liability. In the present case, we are concerned with the assessment year 1967-68. 3. On appeal against the assessment order, the A...
indira Devi Vs. the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal and o ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-02-1988
Reported in: AIR1989Kant182
M. Rama Jois, J.1. These four appeals arise out of a common order passed in W.P. Nos. 31931 and 31932/1982.*2. The facts, in brief, which lead to these appeals are as follow:(i) One K. Jayaraja Ballal was the Managing Partner of the firm ''M/s. Ballal Motor Service' (for short 'the firm'). He had a permit bearing No. 4/77-78 issued under S. 63(7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short 'the Act') by the Karnataka State Transport Authority, Bangalore (for short `KSTA'). The motor vehicle covered by the permit was bearing registration No. MEG 5142. As disputes arose among the partners, they were referred to the Arbitrators. One of the disputes referred for arbitration was the right to the aforesaid permit and the vehicle. On 31-121981 the said K. Jayaraja Ballal died leaving behind him his wife and major and minor children, his mother, brothers and sisters. Both the widow of the said K. Jayaraja Ballal and the Firm reported the dateh of the petitioner to the KSTA and requested for tra...
indira Devi Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-02-1988
Reported in: ILR1988KAR2535; 1988(2)KarLJ126
Rama Jois, J.1. These four appeals arise out of a common order passed in W.P.Nos.31931 and 31932/1982.2. The facts, in brief, which lead to these appeals are as follow:(i) One K. Jayaraja Ballal was the Managing Partner of the firm 'Ballal Motor Service' (for short 'The Firm'). He had a permit bearing No. 4/77-78 issued under Section 63(7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short 'the Act') by the Karnataka State Transport Authority, Bangalore (for short 'KSTA'). The motor vehicle covered by the permit was bearing registration No. MEG 5142. As disputes arose among the partners, they were referred to the A Rbitrators. One of the disputes referred for arbitration was the right to the aforesaid permit and the vehicle. On 31-12-1981 the said K. Jayaraja Ballal died leaving behind him his wife and major and minor children, his mother, brothers and sisters. Both the widow of the said K. Jayaraja Ballal and the Firm reported the death of the petitioner to the KSTA and requested for transfer...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›