Karnataka Court June 1985 Judgments
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-03-1985
Reported in: [1985]156ITR269(KAR); [1985]156ITR269(Karn)
Puttaswamy, J.1. In these cases, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore (Tribunal), at the instance of the assessee and the Revenue had stated a case and has referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this court : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to initial depreciation under section 32(1)(iv) of the I.T. Act, on the cost of the co-operative stores building 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to depreciation allowance on the cost of preparation and reproduction of drawings, specifications and other technical information paid to the foreign collaborator, on the basis that they are plant within the meaning of section 32 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in disallowing the assessee's claim ...
Tag this Judgment!Srikanth Rao Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-03-1985
Reported in: ILR1985KAR2616; 1985(2)KarLJ297; (1986)ILLJ197Kant
ORDER1. The petitioner has presented this writ petition praying for quashing the order of the State Government refusing to refer the dispute between him and the Management of K. Devappa Naik and Sons about the imposition of penalty of dismissal from service against the petitioner for industrial adjudication. 2. The petition has come up of preliminary hearing after notice to the respondents. By consent of counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up for final hearing. 3. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : The petitioner was Conductor in a Motor Transport Undertaking of the third respondent. A charge sheet dated 10th June, 1982 was issued to the petitioner alleging that on 8th June 1982 he allowed some passengers travelling in Bus No. MEG 4462 from Manipal to Mangalore to get down at Hampanakatta but did not allow two others to do so and then he had also misbehaved with a passenger. The third respondent appointed an Enquiry Officer to enquire into the charges levelled a...
Tag this Judgment!Ramaiah Vs. Narasaiah
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-03-1985
Reported in: ILR1985KAR2325
ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This is a tenant's Revision Petition under Section 115 of the C.P.C. against the order of the learned District Judge, Mysore, bearing the date 26-6 1982 made in HR. CRP. No. 128/1981.2. The undisputed facts which are necessary for a just disposal of this Revision Petition may be stated and they are as follows:Respondent Narasiah is the owner of the petition schedule premises (non-residential) in which the revision petitioner before this Court is a tenant. The landlord got issued a notice on 12-7-1979 which was served on the tenant on 14-7-1979 claiming arrears of rentfor a period of 1 1/2 years upto 1-7-1979 at the rate of Rs 60/- per mensem. Apparently, that notice was pursuant to the mandatory requirement of Section 21(1)(a) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The tenant did not pay or tender the rent demanded nor did he issue any reply to the notice. It was in that circumstance that the landlord presented a pe...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›