Karnataka Court May 1982 Judgments
Galaxy Trading and Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. S. Bashan ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-31-1982
Reported in: [1984]56CompCas479(Kar); 1982(2)KarLJ335
ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J. 1. This is an application by the official liquidator under s. 446(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, praying for an order of this court directing the respondents to pay him the sum of Rs. 15, 331.70 together with interest on Rs. 8,200 at six per cent. Per annum from the date of application till the date of realisation. 2. It is stated in the application that the first respondent, S. Bashanudien, was a member of M/s. Galaxy Trading and Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. (in liquidation) in chit group No. AM- I having chit No. 13 in the value of Rs. 10,000. It is further alleged that respondent No. I was the highest bidder at one of the actions held in the said chit group and received payment of prize amount on May 26, 1975. Respondent No. I as well as respondent No. 2, Abdul Shukkor, executed a promissory note jointed on May 26, 1975, in favour of the company (in liquidation) promising to pay the amount mentioned therein with interest at 18 per cent annum. The second respo...
Tag this Judgment!Saira Khatoon Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-25-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Kant205; 1982(2)KarLJ311
Venkatachala, J.1. By consent of learned counsel, this appeal was treated as having been posted for hearing and we heard them.2. This appeal is from the order of Sabhahit, J. allowing Writ Petition No. 9344 of 1978. Respondent 1 therein has presented this appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to according to their respective positions in the writ petition.3. Respondent 1 had let out and the petitioner had taken on lease, a residential building bearing No. 57/14(2), Harshamahal Road, Hassan town, in contravention of Ss. 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Both of them filed declarations before the prescribed authority, House Rent Controller. Hassan (hereinafter referred to as the 'the Controller'). While the petitioner had sought for regularisation of his occupation of the residential building under sub-section (1) of Section 31-C, respondent 1 objected to such regularisation on the ground that t...
Tag this Judgment!Vanivilas Co-operative Sugar Factory Limited Vs. Union of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-24-1982
Reported in: 1990LC90(Karnataka); 1983(12)ELT290(Kar); 1982(2)KarLJ434
ORDER1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order No. ERIS/CC/107(9) Bang/77/339 dated 13th April, 1977 (Exhibit-B) of the respondent. 2. Against the order No. 58/76 dated 31-1-1977 of the Chief Enforcement Officer, Emergency Risks Insurance, Bangalore (Exhibit-A) made under the provisions of the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner lodged an appeal before the respondent. The appeal was sent by the petitioner on 14-3-1977 by Registered Post Acknowledgment due which was received by the respondent on 15-3-1977. On 13-4-1977 the respondent has rejected the said appeal holding that the same is barred by title. 3. Sri P. S. Manjunath, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that in computing the period of 30 days, the authority should have held that the appeal sent by post on 14-3-1977 had been lodged before it on that very day itself and on such a view the appeal filed was...
Tag this Judgment!K.H. Honnappa Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-13-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Kant53; ILR1982KAR1180; 1982(2)KarLJ556
ORDER1. Though this petition is posted for orders; but it is taken up for final hearing on a submission made by the learned counsel appearing for both the sides that the main petition itself be heard instead of hearing and deciding the interlocutory application.2. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for a writ of certiorari to quash Annexures 'A' and 'B' dated 2-4-1982 and also to pass such other orders as are deemed fit under the circumstances of the case. Annexures 'A' and 'B' are dated 2-4-1982. Annexure-A is the notice of the Bye-election proposed to be held to the office of the President, Town Municipal Council, Kadur under Rule 3 (1) of the Karnataka Municipalities (President and Vice President) Election Rules, 1965 (herein-after referred to as the 'Rules'). Annexure-B is another notice issued by the Election Officer stating that a meeting of the Municipal councillors will be held on 16-4-1982 at 11.00 a.m. to elect ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›