Karnataka Court May 1981 Judgments
Vonti Chennappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-28-1981
Reported in: ILR1981KAR1305
ORDER1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the auction sale of minor forest produce in respect of Tupra leaves of Sandur Firka and minor forest produce of Hospet taluk.2. Among others, the petitioner is a forest contractor for, the removal of the minor forest produce in the aforesaid areas the term of which is due to expire on 30-6-1981.3. For the two years period commencing from 1-7-1981, respondent 4 initiated action for the disposal of the forest produce of the aforesaid areas in accordance with the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the rules made thereunder (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' and 'the Rules'). On 12-5-1981, the right of collecting the Tupra leaves in Sandur Firka was sold by public auction by respondent No. 4 in which, respondent 5 a sitting member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly elected from Sandur Constituency of Bellary District, offered the highest bid of Rs. 50,1001- as against the second h...
Tag this Judgment!M.R. Anthony Swamy Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-i and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-27-1981
Reported in: (1981)24CTR(Kar)1; [1982]135ITR424(KAR); [1982]135ITR424(Karn); [1981]7TAXMAN310(Kar)
Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition has assailed the legality of the order date July 14, 1978, passed by the Tax Recovery Office-III, Bangalore (2nd respondent herein), passed under r. 61 of Sch, II to the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), as well as the order date December 30, 1978, passed under sub-r. 1(c) of r. 86 of Sch. II to the Act, in appeal, by the 1st respondent, Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-I. 2. The petitioner is a contractor by profession and is also an assessee borne on the file of the ITO, Assessment-2 Circle II, Bangalore. He was assessed to income-tax for the relevant assessment years 1968-69 and 1972-73. Aggrieved by the assessment orders, he preferred appeals the AAC partly allowed the appeal relating to the assessment year 1968-69 and in respect of the assessment year 1972-73, he confirmed the assessment order made by the ITO. Aggrieved by the orders of the AAC, the petitioner preferred revision petitions to t...
Tag this Judgment!Hosali Press (P). Ltd. Vs. K.N. Guruswamy and Co. (P.) Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-27-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Kant153; ILR1981KAR946
1. This appeal is instituted by the plaintiff-appellant in 0. S.No. 595 of 1980 on the file of the Tenth Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore and is directed against the order passed by him or) 1. A, No. I in the suit rejecting the prayer for temporary injunction during the pendency of the suit.2. It is the case of the plaintiff-appellant that he is the tenant of suit premises in which he is running a printing press under the name and style 'Hosali Press (P) Limited'. It is his case that he had a right of way to the press through a 'cutcha' road, which reaches the main entrance of the press. It is his further case that he was bringing articles required by the press through vans, cars and trucks by this road and according to him feelings became strained between the landlord and tenant as an application for eviction was instituted against the tenant by the landlord-defendant for eviction. It is the further case- of the plaintiff-appellant that with a view to harass the plaintiff and th...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›