Karnataka Court November 1978 Judgments
G.P. Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-28-1978
Reported in: AIR1979Kant63; ILR1979KAR818
ORDER1. In this writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the Official Memorandum No. HUD 619 MLR 78 dated 2nd Nov., 1978 issued by the Government of Karnataka transferring him as Manager, City Municipal Council, Bellary, (Exhibit D).2. As a member of the Karnataka Municipal Administrative Service, the petitioner was working as an Octroi Superintendent, City Municipal Council, Raichur. In Official Memorandum No. HUD 619 MLR 78 dated 16-9-1978 (Exhibit B), the Government transferred and posted the petitioner as Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Harihar, in the place of respondent No. 2. By the same order, the Government transferred respondent No. 2 who was then working as Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Harihar, as Office Manager, City Municipal Council, Bellary. In pursuance of the order of transfer, the petitioner reported for duty at Harihar on 28-9-1978 while respondent No. 2 proceeded on leave without handing over charge to the peti...
Tag this Judgment!B. Nagaraj and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-08-1978
Reported in: AIR1979Kant67
ORDER1. In this writ petition, the writ petitioners have questioned the proceedings of the Land Tribunal, Tumkur Taluk, culminating in its order D/- 6-7-1976 (Vide Exhibit 'A) emanated from the application in Form No. 7 made by respondent No. 4 pursuant to the provisions of the Land Reforms Act, 1961 (to be referred to as the 'Act') seeking registration occupancy in respect of lands comprised in Sl. Nos. 126 and 130/1 of Holkal village, Gulur hobli, Tumkur Taluk. It has to be mentioned at the outset that respondent 4 when made the application in Form No.7 before the Land Tribunal, he also filed an application supported by an affidavit, seeking condonation of delay in filing the application in Form No. 7. The Land Tribunal, having held the enquiry on the basis of Form No. 7, has made the order dated 6-7-76 which order is impugned in this writ petition by the writ petitioners, the first of whom was arrayed as a landlord by respondent No. 4 in Form No. 7 itself. Though in the writ petitio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›