Skip to content

Karnataka Court March 1974 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 06 1974

Abdul Ghani Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-06-1974

Reported in: 1975CriLJ475

ORDERChandrashekhar, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, read with Section 491, Cr. P. C, the petitioner has challenged his detention under the provisions of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act ,1971, (Central Act 26 of 1971), (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. Most of the material facts are not in dispute. The District Magistrate, Gulbarga, {respondent 2 herein), by his order dated 27-8-1973 (Ext. A); made in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, directed that the petitioner be detained in the Central Jail, Bellary. On the same day, a communication (Ext. B) setting out the grounds on which the detention of the petitioner was ordered, was addressed to him. On 3-9-1973, the District Magistrate reported to the State Government the fact of his having made the order. Exhibit A, By its order dated 7-9-1973 (Ext. C). the Government approved the aforesaid order of the District Magistrate. On 13-9-1973 the petitioner ma...


Mar 04 1974

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. B.C. Srinivasa Setty

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-04-1974

Reported in: ILR1975KAR107; [1974]96ITR667(KAR); [1974]96ITR667(Karn); 1974(2)KarLJ261

Govinda Bhat, C.J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, has stated a case and referred the following question for the opinion of this court : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the provisions of section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, would not apply to the capital gains arising from the transfer of goodwill by the assesses firm ?' 2. The assessee was a partnership firm consisting of three partners constituted under an instrument of partnership executed on July 28, 1954. The said partnership was dissolved on December 1, 1965, and its business was taken over by another partnership constituted under an instrument dated December 2, 1965. At the time of the dissolution of the assesses firm its goodwill was valued at Rs. 1,50,000 and the account of each partner was credited with an amount of Rs. 50,000. The said amount of Rs. 1,50,000 was realised by the assessee from the new partnership firm as conside...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial