Karnataka Court December 1972 Judgments
Sri Harthi Adirajaiah Vs. Savandamma Wd/O. Sri N.C. Nagarajaiah and an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-15-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Kant213; AIR1973Mys213; (1973)1MysLJ247
1. Shri Harathi Adirajaiah has preferred this Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the award made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in Misc. Case No 358 of 1966. Respondent No. 1. Smt. Savandamma, has preferred cross-objections involving the provisions of Order XLI, Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. She filed a petition on 16-4-1966 under Section 110-A of the Act before the Tribunal and prayed that a compensation of Rs. 20,000/- be awarded on account of the death caused to her husband. K. C. Nagaraju, on 9-5-1965 as a result of an accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Vehicle MYD 1797 owned by the appellant. It is alleged in the application that the deceased was a P.W.D. Contractor aged about 28 years who was earning an income of about Rs. 300/- per month.It is not disputed that Nagaraju boarded the bus at Dobspet ...
Tag this Judgment!T. Venkanna Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Mysore by Its Registrar and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Kant127; AIR1973Mys127; (1973)1MysLJ143
G.K. Govinda Bhat, J. 1. In response to Notification No. GOB 291/72 dated 4-4-1972 and published in the Mysore Gazette dated 6-4-1972, Sri T. Venkanna, a practising Advocate offered himself for being considered by the High Court for recommendation to be appointed as a District Judge. Since he was not called for interview by the High Court, he preferred W. P. No. 2937 of 1972 which came up for preliminary hearing for admission on the 28th of November, 1972 before us. The petitioner was not represented by counsel and he appeared in person and wanted to argue from the Bar his own cause. He was told by us to disrobe himself and then address the Court The petitioner insisted that he should be heard without being required to remove his Gown. Being of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to argue with his robes on since he was arguing his own cause, his petition was dismissed. The said order reads thus:--'The petitioner Sri T. Venkanna is an Advocate of this Court. He has not engag...
Tag this Judgment!Krishnappa Ramasa Walvekar Vs. Ramchandrasa Ramasa Walvekar and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Kant234; AIR1973Mys234; (1973)1MysLJ115
A. Narayana Pai, C.J. 1. This Second Appeal has been referred to a Bench by Venkataswami, J. because he was not inclined to agree with the view taken by another single Judge Datar. J. in the case of Krishnaji v. Mittikoppa the judgment wherein is reported at page 674 of 1972 (1) Mysore Law Journal = (AIR 1972 Mys 274) so far as the correct effect of the Explanation to Section 12 of the Limitation Act. 1963, is concerned. 2. The judgment in O. S. No.418 of 1961 on the file of the SecondJoint Civil Judge, Junior Division. Belgaum, was pronounced against appellanton the 17th of January 1964 and the decree was drawn up and actually signedon the 14th of February 1964. By then,the appellant had already applied forcertified copies of the judgment anddecree on the 5th of February 1964.Without any further loss of time on thepart of the appellant, the copies weretaken delivery of by him On the 16thof March 1964. He filed his appeal againstthe same before the District Court atBelgaum on the 9th o...
Tag this Judgment!D. Cawasji and Co. Vs. the State of Mysore and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-1972
Reported in: [1973]31STC445(Kar)
ORDERGovinda Bhat, J. 1. In these writ petitions preferred under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of the Mysore Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1969 (Mysore Act 17 of 1969), hereinafter called the impugned Act. They have prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents to refund the amounts collected by way Of sales tax on duty of excise, education cess and health cess, on sales of arrack effected by the State to the petitioners between 1st July, 1966, and 30th June, 1967. The impugned Act by amendment of serial No. 39 in the Second Schedule to the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 (Mysore Act 25 of 1957) (hereinafter called the Act) enhanced the rate of sales tax on 'country liquor other than toddy' from 'six and a half per cent.' to 'forty-five per cent.' with retrospective effect to operate from the first day of April, 1966. It further validated the excess collection of tax made by the State. 2. In order to appreciate the contentions ur...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›