Karnataka Court October 1971 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hirianna Shetty Vs. State of Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-08-1971
Reported in: 1972CriLJ976
ORDERK. Bhimiah, J.1. The petitioner was tried for an offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Munsiff-cum-Magistrate (First Class). Udipi on a charge-sheet filed by the Udipi Rural Police. The charge against the petitioner was that on 1-1-1970 at about 7 a. m. he voluntarily beat Guru-raja Bhatta (P. W. 1) with a firewood and caused simple hurt. Six P. Ws. were examined in support of the prosecution case. But the Investigating Officer was not examined by the prosecution. The learned Munsiff. after considering the evidence produced by the prosecution, found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 324 and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.2. The accused challenged the legality and correctness of his conviction and sentence before the Sessions Judge of South Kanara at Mangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 82 of 197Q. The ...
Pandikuthira Mrs. Chengappa Vs. Muruvanda Machayya and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-05-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Kant228; AIR1972Mys228
C. Honniah, J.1. This Second Appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-appellant for a declaration that she is entitled to 1/3rd share in the suit schedule properties and for partition of the same into three equal shares and to put her in separate possession of her 1/3rd share and for mesne profits.2. The plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are sisters, being daughters of one Medappa and Honawa. The suit schedule properties, according to the plaintiff, belonged to her mother Honnavva. During the lifetime of her father the properties were being managed by him and after his death, they were being managed bv her brother Kariyappa. P. W. 3 till 1948 and thereafter, for about 5 years the wet lands were lying fallow. The plaintiff was away from Coorg as her husband had been employed. The third defendant is the husband of the first defendant. It appears, during the absence of the plaintiff, defendants 1 and 3 occupied a portion of the wet lands and a portion of 'Bane' lands and began ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›