Karnataka Court January 1970 Judgments

The Central Bank of India, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Prov ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2008(5)KCCRSN651

B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. This appeal filed by the first defendant is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 24.08.1996 passed by the IV Additional City Civil Judge at Mayo Hall, Bangalore in O.S. No. 10280/1987 whereby the plaintiff's trait for recovery of a sum of Rs. 7,69,280.73 is decreed with costs and current and future interest at 15% per annum.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their statue before the Trial Court as plaintiff 'Corporation', 1st defendant - 'Bank' and 2nd defendant - 'Company'.3. The plaintiff, Karnataka State Financial Corporation had filed a suit against the defendant s se eking a Judgement and Decree of a sum of Rs. 7,69,280.73 and future interest @ 15% p.a. from 27.1.1987 till the date of realisation with costs jointly and severally against the defendants.4. According to the plaintiff, the second defendant which is a Private Limited Company had applied for two terra loans with the plaintiff for setting up of a Sm...

Lakme Premmaiah D/O Sri Pemmaiah P.G. Represented by Her Father Sri Pe ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2009(4)KCCR3044

ORDERB.S. Patil, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner-student is challenging the communication dated 17.6.2009 issued by Respondent No. 2 vide Annexure-A expressing regret that on close scrutiny of the OBC list issued by the Government of India, the caste of the petitioner does not appear in the list even though it is found in the State OBC list and, as such, her admission has been cancelled. Petitioner is informed to collect her original marks card along with the fees. Petitioner is also seeking a direction to Respondent No. 2 - The Coordinator of All India Institute of Speech & Hearing, to forward the OBC list to Respondent No. 4 the State of Karnataka. A further direction is sought to the State Government to forward this OBC list to the Central Government so as to enable the Central Government to include 'Kodeva' caste in the list of OBC of the central list. (This prayer is not clear. However, the petitioner's counsel submits that, in substance, this is the request of the peti...

Smt. Sarojamma W/o Pushparaj Vs. Sri Puttaraju (Since Deceased by his ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERAravind Kumar, J.1. The respondent before the trial Court is questioning the orders passed on I.A. II dated 10-11-2009 in HRC 180/2007 on the file of the XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore.2. The facts in nutshell are as follows:Respondent herein initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in HRC 180/2007 under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. It was contended in the eviction petition that they purchased the property bearing No. 72, assessment No. 133 K. No. 71C Laggere village, Yeshwanthapura Hobli. Measuring east to West 30 North to South 50' wherein the petition schedule premises is situated under sale deed dated 19-6-2006 from one Sri Anthony Raj. Subsequent to the purchase khatha has also been transferred to their name and they have been paying taxes.3. It was further contended subsequent to the purchase the respondent was informed about the purchase of the property and on the understanding that the respondent has agreed to continu...

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (Rep. by Its Deputy Manager Smt. Sudha Gan ...

Court: Karnataka

V. Jagannathan, J.1. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and in view of the short point involved for consideration, this appeal Stands disposed of finally.2. Appellant's Counsel Shri M. Arun Ponnappa subnets that award of the W.C. Commissioner is called in question only as regards interest part of the award is concerned and interest is payable as per the Apex Court decision in Nasir's case AIR2009 SCW 3717 at 7% from the date of application till the award of the Commissioner and thereafter wards till payment is mode at 12%.3. The above submission of the appellant's Counsel requires to be accepted in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in decision referred to above. Accordingly, the order of the Commissioner is modified only in so far sis interest is concerned and interest is payable is at 7% from the date of claim application till the date of award of the commissioner and thereafter at 12% till payment is made.Appeal is allowed to the above extent....

Sri Veeraiah S/o Late Siddaiah Vs. Sri Puttaraju (Since Deceased by hi ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERAravind Kumar, J.1. In this revision petition, respondent is questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed in HRC No. 182/2007 dated 10-11-2009 on the file of the XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore.2. The facts in nutshell are as follows:Respondent herein initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in HRC 182/2007 under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. It was contended in the eviction petition that they purchased the property bearing No. 72, assessment No. 133 K. No. 710 Laggere village Yeshwanthapura Hobli. Measuring east to West 30 North to South 50' wherein the petition schedule premises is situated under sale deed dated 19-6-2006 from one Sri Anthony Raj. Subsequent to the purchase khatha has also been transferred to their name and they have been paying taxes.3. It was further contended subsequent to the purchase the respondent was informed about the purchase of the property and on the understanding that respondent ha...

Shankarappa Vs. Chikka Kempamma W/O Late Surappa and Siddappa (Since D ...

Court: Karnataka

Subhash Badi, J.1. Appellant in both the appeals is one Shankarappa who is plaintiff in O.S. No. 245/1987 and 3rd defendant in O.S. No. 183/1987. Defendant No. 1 has filed O.S. No. 183/1987 interalia seeking declaration, declaring that, she is the absolute owner in possession of the suit schedule property, whereas, the appellant plaintiff has sought for declaration that he is the owner of the suit schedule property by virtue of adoption by defendant No. 1.2. Since the issue involved in both the suits being common, both the suits were clubbed together and joint trial was held.3. The case of the plaintiff is that, one Pillemane Gudiyappa was the propositus. He had three children namely Surappa, Kempaiah and Chikka Gadiyappa. Surappa's wife is Chikka Kempamma the plaintiff in O.S. No. 183/1987. Plaintiff appellant is grand son of Kempaiah. Chikka Gadiyappa died issue less. By virtue of adoption by Chikka Kempamma, plaintiff has become absolute owner of the suit schedule properties of Sura...

Smt. Mumtaz W/o Late Chamman Sab Vs. Sri Puttaraju (Since Deceased by ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERAravind Kumar, J.1. In this revision petition, respondent is questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed in HRC No. 179/2007 dated 10-11-2009 on the file of the XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore.2. The facts in nutshell are as follows:Respondent herein initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in HRC 179/2007 under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. It was contended in the eviction petition that they purchased the property bearing No. 72, assessment No. 133 K. No. 710 Laggere village, Yeshwanthapura Bobli. Measuring east to West 30 North to South 50 wherein the petition schedule premises is situated under sale deed dated 19-6-2006 from one Sri Anthony Raj. Subsequent to the purchase khatha has also been transferred to their name and they have been paying taxes.3. It was further contended subsequent to the purchase the respondent was informed about the purchase of the property and on the understanding that respondent ha...

Sri Mannappa Gowda S/o Gangappa Vs. Sri Pattaraju (Since Deceased by h ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERAravind Kumar, J.1. In this revision petition, respondent is questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed in HRC No. 181/2007 dated 10-11-2009 on the file of the XI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore.2. The facts in nutshell are as follows:Respondent herein initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in HRC 181/2007 under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. It was contended in the eviction petition that they purchased the property bearing No. 72, assessment No. 133 K. No. 710 Laggere village, Yeshwanthapura Hobli. Measuring east to West 30 North to South 50' wherein the petition schedule premises is situated under sale deed dated 19-6-2006 from one Sri Anthony Raj. Subsequent to the purchase khatha has also been transferred to their name and they have been paying taxes.3. It was further contended subsequent to the purchase the respondent was informed about the purchase of the property and on the understanding that respondent h...