Karnataka Court July 1968 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pandharinath Gyanoba Rao and ors. Vs. Manikrao Shamrao and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Kant84; AIR1969Mys84
Kalagate, J.1. The common issues raised in all the three petitions, namely E. P. 17, E. P. 19, and E. P. 23 of 1967 and which were tried together are issued IV(a), (b) and (c) in E. P. 17 of 1967 and issues Nos. II(a), (b) and (c) in E. P. 19 and 23 of 1967 respectively, Issue No. IV(a), (b) and (c) read as follows:IV. (a) Does the petitioner prove that it was necessary under law to prepare a translation of the Electoral Roll into Marathi Language? (b) Does he further prove that the Marathi Roll so prepared suffered from the following two defects or either of them: (i) That the serial numbers in the Marathi Roll did not tally with the serial numbers in the Kannada Roll; and (ii) that several names contained in the Kannada Roll were omitted to be copied in the Marathi Roll? (c) Does he further prove that in consequence of the above, the result of the election so far as the respondent is concerned had been materially affected?2. This issue was raised on the following allegations.'The Ele...
Subbamma and anr. Vs. V. Kannappachari
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-12-1968
Reported in: 1970CriLJ59
ORDER1. The petitioners were the accused in Criminal Case No. 181/3 of 1967 in the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Raichur. The offence which had been complained of against them was one punishable under Section 7(1) of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act. Process had been issued against the accused and they appeared in response to the summons and were represented by Advocate. In the meanwhile the complainant having died, an application was made on behalf of her brother's son praying for permission to continue the prosecution. On behalf of the accused a contention has been raised to the effect that on the death of the complainant, the complaint had abated and that the accused had to be acquitted. In support of this contention, reliance appears to have been placed on the provisions of Section 247 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Magistrate rejected the contention which had been raised on behalf of the accused and he permitted the brother's son of the dece...
Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Karkhana Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-1968
Reported in: [1968(17)FLR425]; ILR1968KAR669; (1969)ILLJ658Kant; (1968)2MysLJ422
Somnath Ayyar, J. 1. On 16 November, 1966, the State Government made a reference under S. 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act to the industrial tribunal. That reference incorporated thirteen matters on which the tribunal was asked to make its award. 2. After the production of the pleadings, the matter was adjourned from time to time and on one occasion on behalf of the workmen of the sugar factory known as the Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Karkhana, an adjournment was asked and that adjournment was granted. But on the next occasion when an adjournment was again sought, it was refused, and the tribunal disposed of the reference observing : 'From the charter of demands it is clear that the first party has to establish their right to those demands. The attitude adopted by the secretary indicates that the first party workmen were not very keen about prosecuting this case. I, therefore, find that the first party has failed to substantiate the reference. For the abovesaid reasons, the ref...
Nippani Electricity Company (Private) Ltd. (by Its Director, V. R. Pat ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-05-1968
Reported in: [1968(17)FLR281]; (1969)ILLJ268Kant; (1968)2MysLJ194
ORDER1. The question raised in the revision petition relates to the jurisdiction of the trial Court to entertain the suit. 2. The facts leading to the question as appears from the pleadings of the parties may thus be state. Plaintiffs eight in number claimed to be the employees of defendant 1, Nippani Electricity Company, (Private) Ltd. Which is an industrial establishment, over a period between six and twelve years. The Mysore State Electricity Board stated supplying its grid power to the defendant-company for distribution in the city and suburbs of Nippani. Therefore, the defendant-company closed down its generation station with effect from 6 November, 1966. Thereafter, it gave notices to the plaintiffs informing them the their services will be discontinued with effect from the afternoon of 31 December, 1966, and also a notice to the Government as required under rule 77 of the Industrial Disputes (Mysore) Rules, 1967, in form P to the effect that it had decided to retrench eight work...
M.G. Bros. Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Mysore, Bangalore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-1968
Reported in: [1975]35STC36(Kar)
Somnath Iyer, J.1. On behalf of the Government of the new State of Mysore, the Stores Purchase committee called for tenders from persons who were willing to construct bus bodies on the chassis supplied by the Government. On the acceptance of the tender submitted by the petitioner before us, which is a firm which engages itself in bus body building and other activities, an agreement was entered not between the Government and the petitioner, under which he agreed to build bus bodies on the chassis supplied by the Government on terms and conditions enumerated in that agreement. This agreement was executed on 23rd January, 1959. 2. When the petitioner produced its return the Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 1960-61, it stated in its return that a sum of Rs. 9,74,460 represented the amounts received by it for the bus bodies constructed under the agreement for the Mysore State Road Transport Corporation which by then laid been established under the Road Transport Corporation Act and whi...
Wool Industry Development Co-operative Association Ltd. Vs. Khadi and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1968
Reported in: ILR1968KAR638; (1968)2MysLJ136
1. Under the provisions of the Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 which will be referred to as the Act in the course of this judgment, a Commission known as the Khadi and Village Industries Commission, will be referred to as the Commission, was established under Section 4 of that Act. The purpose of the Act was the development of Khadi and village industries and other matters connected therewith, and, Section 15 of the Act enumerated the functions of the Commission which included the encouragement of the production of Khadi and the development of village industries and research in the technique of the production of Khadi. Section 19 of the Act authorised the Commission to spend such sums of money as it thought fit on the purposes authorised by the Act.2. At one stage the commission decided for the encouragement of the production of woollen blankets, to pay rebate on the retail sales of such woollen blankets referred to as kambals and kambalis at the rate of 10%. Pursuant...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›