Karnataka Court November 1968 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rangappa (K.) Vs. State of Mysore and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-1968
Reported in: ILR1969KAR225; (1970)ILLJ155Kant
Somnath Ayyar, J.1. When the petitioner was superseded and his juniors were promoted to the next higher grade of Excise Inspector, the petitioner appealed to Government and the appeal succeeded. By an order made by Government on 31 July, 1961, two persons who were juniors to the petitioners but who had been promoted earlier were placed below the petitioner and the petitioner was assigned higher position. His promotion to the next higher grade of Excise Inspector was made retrospective and it took effect from the date on which his immediate junior was promoted. 2. Thereafter, the petitioner was urging for the re-fixation of his pay in the higher post on the basis of the retrospective promotion, and, notwithstanding a large number of reminders sent by him to Government he received no reply. This writ petition is the sequel to the correspondence which went on between the petitioner and Government in that way. Although the prayer in this writ petition is somewhat cumbersome, it is clear th...
Shiddappa (H.S.) Vs. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-08-1968
Reported in: (1970)ILLJ159Kant
Somnath Ayyar, J. 1. The petitioner is an employee of a co-operative society, and at one stage he was dismissed from service and that dismissal was questioned in Writ Petition No. 409 of 1955. During the pendency of that writ petition the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative societies in Chitradurga sent a communication to the society on 24 March, 1966 directing the society to keep the petitioner under suspension. In obedience to that mandate the society passed a resolution on 18 April, 1966 placing the petitioner under suspension. It is this order of suspension which is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Sri Datar tells us that in the earlier writ petition as compromise was reached between the society and the petitioner pursuant to which there has been a reinstatement of the petitioner. So Sri Datar submitted to us that even the impugned order of suspension has come to an end with such reinstatement. But Sri Lingappa appearing for the society made the submission that he has no inform...
Bedi and Co. (Private) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer Central Circle Ii, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-07-1968
Reported in: [1969]73ITR586(KAR); [1969]73ITR586(Karn); (1969)1MysLJ430
Somnath Lyer, J.1. An assessee under the Income-tax Act is the petitioner before us and he asks us to quash the proceedings by which the Income-tax Officer of Central Circle II, Bangalore, proposed to assessee escaped income in respect of the assessment year 1960-61. A notice for that purpose was sent to the assessee by the Income-tax Officer under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee is a private company called Bedi & Co.(P.) Ltd., which engaged itself in the activity of promoting the formation of a public company called the Mandya National Paper Mills Ltd. In that context this private company arranged for the purchase of machinery required for the public company from a company in Canada called Parsons and Wittemore Company Ltd. 3. In the assessment proceedings the assesses-company stated that during the negotiations for that purchase, a sum of Rs. 32,58,500 was advanced by the Canada company to the assesses-company to purchase shares of that value in the paper mil...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›