Karnataka Court May 1964 Judgments
Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Siddique (M.A.)
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-25-1964
Reported in: (1965)ILLJ373Kant; (1964)1MysLJ526
Somnath Ayyar, J.1. This is an appeal under S. 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The material facts are these. The respondent before us is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act carrying on a tailoring business. The appellant which is the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under the provisions of S. 3 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, called upon the respondent to pay contribution under S. 40(1) of the Act to the fund to be created under its provisions. The respondent was called upon to pay a sum of Rs. 300 for the period between 31 July 1960 and 28 January 1961 on what is described as an ad hoc basis. The only ground on which this demand was resisted by the respondent was that the respondent was not a factory within the meaning of S. 2(12) of the Act. Thereupon the appellant-Corporation made an application under S. 75(2) of the Act to the Employees' State Insurance Court for a direction that the respondent should make...
Tag this Judgment!Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. M.A.H. Siddique
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-25-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Kant71; AIR1965Mys71; ILR1964KAR555
Somnath Iyer, J. (1) This is an appeal under Section 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The material facts are these: The respondent before us is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act carrying on a tailoring business. The appellant which is the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under the provisions of Section 3 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 called upon the respondent to pay contribution under Section 40(1) of the Act to the fund to be created under its provisions. The respondent was called upon to pay a sum of Rs. 300/- for the period between July 31, 1960 and January 28, 1961 on what is described as an ad hoc basis. The only ground on which this demand was resisted by the respondent was that the respondent was not a factory within the meaning of Section 2(12) of the Act. Thereupon the appellant Corporation made an application under Section 75(2) of the Act to the Employees' Insurance Court for a direction that the...
Tag this Judgment!C.N. Krishna Murthy Vs. Abdul Subban and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-1964
Reported in: 1965CriLJ565
K.S. Hegde, J.1. This is an appeal against the conviction and sentence of the appellant in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 4 of 1957 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Bangalore, wherein the appellant was tried and convicted for offences under Sections 409 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years under each count, but the two sentences, were ordered to run concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the accused who was the Treasurer in the State Huzur Treasury at Bangalore, while being in custody of the State funds, embezzled a sum of Rs. 1,10,161/- in the month of June 1953. It is said that he embezzled a sum of Rs. 75,000/- on 1.6.1953, Rs. 5,000/- on 22.6.1953 Rs. 10,000/- on 24.6.1953, Rs. 5,000/- on 26.6.1953 Rs. 10,000/-on 27.6.1953 and Rs. 5,000/- on 30.6.1953. The further case for the prosecution is that to cover up those embezzlements, he falsified the relevant account books, namely, the Doubl...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›