Karnataka Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt Reshma Mohan Pammar Sayyad vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103542 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT RESHMA MOHAN PAMMAR @ SAYYAD AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MAHARANA PRATAP COLONY SHIRASAGOAN TQ. SHRIRAMPUR, DT. AHMEDANAGAR MAHARASHTRA, PRESENTLY RESIDIDNG AT BELAGAVI. PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.B. DEYANNAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH TILAKWADI POLICE STATION BELAGAVI, R/BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BENCH DHARWAD.CHANDRASHEKAR KATTIMANI 2. KR. ANJALI MAHADEV PAMMAR AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. LEGAL PRACTICE, R/O 1361 I LAST STAFF SHAHU NAGAR BELAGAVI. RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THAT THE FALSE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 12:39:19 +0530INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN TILAKWADI P.S. CR.NO. 78/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. DIST. AND ...
Chintamani S/O Sannadurgappa Sannakkinavar vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.103436 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. CHINTAMANI S/O SANNADURGAPPA SANNAKKINAVAR AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. VIDYA NAGAR, HARUGERI 591220.2. SHANTAVVA W/O CHINTMANI SANNAKKINVAR AGE. 66 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O VIDYA NAGAR, HARUGERI 591220,3. RAVI S/O TAYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,4. INDU D/O TAYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. SOCIAL WORK, KATTIMANI TQ. RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI.5. SRIMANTA S/O SANNADURGAPPA SANNAKKINAVAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 12:39:18 +05306. INDRAVVA W/O RAJU GANIGER AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,7. SURESH S/O TAYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, -2-8. ROOPA W/O ANAND GANIGER9. GANGAVVA W/O TAYAPPA GANIGER AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,10. SATYAVVA W/O MALLAPPA GUDADANNAVAR AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE...
Chanabasappa Arigar vs State by Town Police Station
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[CHANABASAPPA ARIGAR AND ANOTHER VS. STATE BY TOWN POLICE STATION] 02.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 01.12.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 01.12.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party is entitl...
Mohammed Ibrahim S/O. Late Mohammed Davood vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.103309 OF 2023 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O. LATE MOHAMMED DAVOOD, AGE. ABOUT 60 YEARS, BALLARI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MRS. ZEENATH FATHIMA W/O. MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, BALLARI DISTRICT-583222. PETITIONER Digitally signed (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE) by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR AND: Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.33/A, LAKKAMMANA HALLI, P.B. ROAD, DHARWAD-580 004. -2-3. M/S. B.M.M. ISPAT LTD.,A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES, REGISTRATION ACT, 1956 HAVING REGISTRAR OFFICE AT NO.114, DANAPUR VILLAGE, HOSPET TALUK, BALLARI...
Chandrashekhar N Kulakarni vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103499 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. CHANDRASHEKHAR N. KULAKARNI CHAIRMAN OF C.T.E SOCIETY CHIKKODI AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. WADA GALLI, CHIKKODI-591201.2. VIJAYA S. MANJAREKARA VICE CHAIRMAN C T E SOCIETY CHIKKODI AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SAYYAD GALLI CHIKKODI-591 201.3. ARUNA S. KULAKARNI SECRETARY /DIRECTOR OF C.T.E SOCIETY CHIKKODI CHANDRASHEKAR4. SATEESHA B. KULAKARNIN AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR 5. YASHAVANTA S. MIRJI Date: 2026.02.03 12:39:19 +0530 R/O.K.C. ROAD, CHIKKODI-591201.6. OMKAR @ SHREEPADA S. KULAKARNI AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. INDIRA ANGAR, CHIKKODI-591 201.7. SANJAY V. ADAKE -2- AGE. 48 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF C.T.E SOCIETY CHIKKOCI AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O OTAR GALLI, CHIKKODI-591201.8. VISHWAKIRANA C. KULAKARNI DIRECTOR OF C.T.E S...
The State of Karnataka vs Sri Babasab T Bhosale, Son of Tukaram Bhosal ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS VS. SRI BABASAB T BHOSALE, SON OF TUKARAM BHOSALE,] 02.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 01.12.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 01.12.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules...
Sri. Krishnamurthy S/O M Subbarao vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O M SUBBARAO VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER] 02.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 01.12.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 01.12.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party i...
Ravi Kotyan S/O Narayana Pujar vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104457 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. RAVI KOTYAN S/O NARAYANA PUJAR, AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,2. BABITHA W/O RAVI KOTYAN, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, PETITIONERS LAXMAN (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Digitally signed by LAXMAN HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Date: 2026.02.04 16:17:31 +0530 DHARWAD BENCH, THROUGH BELLARY RURAL POLICE STATION, BELLARY-583101.2. KHUSHI FOOD AND BEVERAGES, R/O. PLOT NO. 21 AND 22 1ST STAGE, KIADBA INDUSTRIAL AREA, MUDARAGI BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI-583102, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, -2- SMT.ANUPAMA W/O. BASAVRAJ, AGE.29 YEARS, R/O. BALLARI. RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. B.G. INDI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BN...
Kareppa Alias Kariyappa S/O Ramappa Gullennavar vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100332 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA, S/O RAMAPPA GULLENNAVAR, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. UPPAR ONI, KAVALGERI, DHARWAD.2. IRANNA PARASHURAM KARIYANNAVAR, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. NIJAGUNA NAGAR, NEAR PATRESHWARNAGAR, YADVAD ROAD, DHARWAD.3. ANIL RAMESH PASTEY AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KASABAGOUDAR ONI, KAMANAKATTI, DHARWAD. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI4. SAGAR KURTAKOTI @ AVINASH SURESH GADAG, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER, R/O. KELAGERI ROAD, VASA VIHAR, 5TH CROSS, DHARWAD. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.035. SMT. PEERAVVA KUSHAPPA JADHAV 15:09:50 +0530 AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. UPPAR ONI, KAVALAGERI, DHARWAD.6. SUNIL KUMAR SOMASHEKAR MAHENDRAKAR, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SALAKINAKOPPA, JANATA...
Chandrakanth S/O Keshav Vandakar vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103773 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: CHANDRAKANTH S/O KESHAV VANDAKAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF YALAVADAL VILLAGE TQ. KALGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD 581204. PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANKIT RAMESH DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY POLICE INSPECTOR, KALAGHATAGI POLICE STATION, KALAGHATAGI 581204, R/BY HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD 580001.2. RAJIV SHINGH SON OF SHANKARSHING BENGLURKAR AGE. 52 YEARS, FOOD INSPECTOR, C/O OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWD 581204. RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) Date: 2026.02.04 12:57:44 +0530 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OFBNSS 2023, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND MAY EXCISE THE INHERENT POWERS BY QUASHING THE FIR IN KALAGHATAGI POLICE STATION CRIME NO. 156 OF 2025 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 303
- 304
- 305
- 306
- 307
- 309
- 310
- 311
- 312
- 313
- Next ›
- Last »