Karnataka Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri. Sangappa S/O Neelawwa Singhe vs Basappa S/O Balappa Tiliganvi
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100408 OF 2023 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI. SANGAPPA S/O NEELAWWA SINGHE R/O DASHYAL, TQ. AND DIT. VIJAYAPUR 586101. PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH A. BIRANAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: BASAPPA S/O BALAPPA TILIGANVI R/O KAVATAGI, NOW RESIDING AT MAREGUDDI TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT 587121. RESPONDENT(BY MISS. PRANANJALI GODKHINDI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GIRISH YADAWAD, ADVOCATE) CHANDRASHEKAR KATTIMANI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTDATED 23.07.2021 PASSED IN CRL.A NO. 70/2019 BY THE I ADDL. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALAKOTE, SITTING AT KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 16:17:35 +0530 JAMAKHANDI, THEREBY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 28.08.2019 PASSED IN C.C.NO. 580/2016 BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMF...
Spoorti Bhairappanavar, vs the Chief Secretary
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.106087 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SPOORTI BHAIRAPPANAVAR, D/O. MADANKUMAR S. BHAIRAPPANAVAR, AGED 28 YEARS, HOUSE NO.102, SHRUTI PARK, KAMBARGI ROAD, BELAGAVI-590016. PETITIONER (BY SRI. VITTHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE CHIEF SECRETARYMANJANNA E GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, Digitally signed by ROOM NO.320, MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 3RD FLOOR, DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.04 10:28:01 +0530 VIDHANA SOUDHA,2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, -2-3. THE KARNATAKA PUBLICSERVICE COMMISSION UDYOG SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B.SOMAPUR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. SHIVARAJ P.MUDHOL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI...
Smt V Hemalatha D/O Venkatashalu vs M/S Omkar Agencies
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SMT V HEMALATHA D/O VENKATASHALU VS. M/S OMKAR AGENCIES AND OTHERS] 03.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 27.11.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 27.11.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party is enti...
Anjuman E Islam vs the Deputy Commissioner
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND WRIT APPEAL NO. 100582 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: ANJUMAN-E-ISLAM, KUNDUR VILLAGE, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI, BY ITS PRESIDENT, SADIQ DAVALSAB BANNUR. APPELLANT (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI 581 110.2. THE TAHSILDAR,TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI 581 205.3. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICERGRAM PANCHAYAT, KUNDUR, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI 581 202. PATTIHAL Location: High 4. THE SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING COMMITTEE, Court of Karnataka, GOVT. HIGHER PRIMARY KANNADA Dharwad Bench, Dharwad GIRLS SCHOOL, KUNDUR 581 202, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. S.P. KANDAGAL, ADV. FOR R4; NOTICE ISSUED TO R3 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR...
Shri Basanagouda S/O Naganagouda Nagangoudar vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100616 OF 2025 (A) BETWEEN:1. SHRI BASANAGOUDA, S/O NAGANAGOUDA NAGANGOUDAR, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GANDHI NAGAR, BILAGI, TALUK BILAGI, BAGALKOT - 587116.2. SHRI. VIVEK S/O. VASANT KAKAREDDY, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SIDDARAMESHWAR COLONY, WARD NO.5, TALUK MUDHOL, BAGALKOT-587313. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT F.GOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, CHANDRASHEKAR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KATTIMANI DHARWAD - 580001.2. SHRI SALEEM MULLA Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. GEOLOGIST, KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR, 12:57:33 +0530MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SANGAMESHWAR NAGAR, BELAGAVI - 590010. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30B (4) OF MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND ...
Manjunath S/O Suresh Kambale vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[MANJUNATH S/O SURESH KAMBALE VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER] 03.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 04.12.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 04.12.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party is ent...
Shri Ajjappa S/O Ryavappa Kurubar vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI AJJAPPA S/O RYAVAPPA KURUBAR AND ANOTHER VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA] 03.02.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 04.12.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 04.12.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The conduct of the Petitioner shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party i...
Gururaj S/O Shivamanappa Hadapad vs Smt.Sangeeta Alias Parvathi W/O Gu ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101176 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: GURURAJ S/O SHIVAMANAPPA HADAPAD AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BIDARI, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT 587301, NOW R/O. BMTC II DIVISION, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU, TQ. AND DIST. BENGALURU 560064. PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH A. YADAWAD, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SANGEETA @ PARVATHI W/O GURURAJ HADAPAD AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BIDRI, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT 587301. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE)THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28/12/2020 PASSED Digitally signed by BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT, TO SIT Date: 2026.02.04 AT JAMKHANDI, IN CRP NO.130/2019 REVERSING THE ORDER DATED 16:17:26 +0530 CRL.MISC.NO.12/2017 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER 12/02/2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J...
Smt Hema W/O Late Ramkrishna Nayak vs the Zonal Commissioner
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.110036 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. HEMA W/O. LATE RAMKRISHNA NAYAK, AGE ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NO.02, ARVIND NAGAR, KARWAR ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580024. PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S. NIRANJAN, ADVOCATE) AND:Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR 1. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, Location: HIGH ZONAL OFFICE NO.5, COURT OF KARNATAKA HUBLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020.2. THE CHIEF REGISTRAR BIRTH AND DEATH OFFICE, HUBLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020.3. SMT. REKHA AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GROUND FLOOR, RENUKA OPPULANCE, -2-AKSHAY COLONY, NEAR CHETANA COLLEGE, LADIES HOSTEL ROAD, VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580021. RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ...
Abdulrahaman S/O Gousamodinsab Hadagli vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 c BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.107234 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:1. ABDULRAHAMAN S/O. GOUSAMODINSAB HADAGLI AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT-587103.2. MOHAMMADZAID A HADAGALL AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, MANJANNA TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT 587103. E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E3. MUDASSIRLocation: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.04 10:28:01 S/O. ABDULREHAMAN HADAGALL +0530 AGE. 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, ROAD, NO. 08, NAVANAGAR, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT 587103. PETITIONERS (BY SMT. YALAGI KAVYA SHIVAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: -2-1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, JAMKHANDI, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT-587101.3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONTHE TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BTDA), NAVANAGAR, DIST. BAGALKOT-58710...
- ‹ Prev
- 287
- 288
- 289
- 290
- 291
- 293
- 294
- 295
- 296
- 297
- Next ›
- Last »