Karnataka Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sridevi W/O Sharanbasavaraj Hulyal vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
CRL.A NO. 100332/2019 (A)IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SMT. SRIDEVI W/O SHARANBASAVARAJ HULYAL VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR GENERALORAL ORDERCase is called out. No representation on behalf of Appellant. Perused the records. Inspite of granting sufficient opportunity to the Appellant, the Appellant has failed to comply the office objections. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Sd/- (ADDL. REGISTRAR GENERAL) VG List No.:1 Sl No.: 30...
Shri. Gajanan Urban Co-Op Credit Society Ltd, Hubballi vs Bharati W/O ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI. GAJANAN URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, HUBBALLI VS. BHARATI W/O PRAVEEN ANGADI] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3...
Smt Laxmibai W/O Annagouda Patil vs Sri Jambudhanapal Bankapure
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 105352 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O. ANNAGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, NOT CLAIMING SR. CITIZEN BENEFIT.2. SRI. DHULAGOUDA S/O. ANNAGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,3. SRI. RAJAGOUDA S/O. ANNAGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, NO. 1 TO 3 R/O. BORAGAON VILLAGE, TQ: NIPANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR 4. SMT. VASANTI W/O. VIJAY JOKE LAXMAN KATTIMANI AGED BOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Location: HIGH COURT OF R/O. ASHTA VILLAGE, TQ: WALWA, KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DIST: SANGALI. Date: 2025.12.10 16:35:47 +05305. SMT. SHOBHA W/O. KRUSHNATH KAVARE AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WALWA KHURD, TQ: KAGAL, DIST: KOLHAPUR. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA A.MALI, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:1. SRI. JAMBUDHANAPAL BANKAPURE AGED MAJOR, OCC. AG...
Smt Praseetha H vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. WRIT PETITION NO. 107396 OF 2025 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SMT. PRASEETHA H. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. ASSISTANT TEACHER AT GOVERNMENT HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MULLAVALLI, MUNDGOD, R/O. SUBHAS NAGAR, BRUNDAVANA LAYOUT MUNDAGOD, UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT. PETITIONER (BY SRI SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE.) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKADigitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL BENCH Date: 2025.12.04 11:03:03 +0530 EDUCATION AND LITERACY, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS IN KARNATAKA, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.3. THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, COMMISSIONER OFFICE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. -2-4...
Grameen Abhirudhi Shikshana Samithi vs the District Registrar of Socie ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 108988 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. GRAMEEN ABHIRUDHI SHIKSHANA SAMITHI, GADAG, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, VINAYA H. KENGANNAVAR, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. SHIV-PARVATHI NAGAR, HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580020.2. SMT. SUVARNA SHIVARUDRAPPA KORISHETTAR, AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: PRESIDENT OF GRAMEENA ABHIRUDHI SHIKASHANA SAMITHI, GADAG, R/O. SHIV-PARVATHI NAGAR, HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580020.Digitally signed by 3. VINAYA HANUMANTH KENGANUR CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY OF GRAMEENA KATTIMANI Location: HIGH ABHIRUDHI SHIKASHANA SAMITHI, GADAG, COURT OF KARNATAKA R/O. SHIV-PARVATHI NAGAR, DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.05 HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580020. 10:52:33 +05304. HANUMANTH BASAVANEPPA KENGANUR AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: VICE PRESIDENT OF GRAMEENA ABHIRUDHI SHIKASHANA SAMITHI, GADAG, R/O. MAREWAD, TQ & DIST: DHARWAD.5. PARME...
Smt Vatsalabai W/O Baburao Desai vs the Executive Engineer
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 100172 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SMT. VATSALABAI W/O BABURAO DESAI, AGE. 85 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD, R/O. DESAI COMPOUND, NEAR KARNATAKA HIGH SCHOOL, FORT, DHARWAD, REP. BY GPA HOLDER, SRI. SHARATSCHANDRA B. DESAI, AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, NOW R/O. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI-581 104. PETITIONER (BY SRI. DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA HOUSE BOARD, Digitally signed by HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 020. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERCOURT OF AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD-580 001. Date: 2025.12.05 10:52:29 +0530 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. I.C. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2023 PASSED BY II ADDI...
H C Raghavendra vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[H C RAGHAVENDRA VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is also absent. This shows that, the Complainant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Ru...
Pratik S/O Late Shrikant More vs the Karnataka Power Transmission Corp ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[PRATIK S/O LATE SHRIKANT MORE VS. THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD (KPTCL) AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-X...
M/S Uday Motors vs the Authorized Officer
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[M/S UDAY MOTORS AND OTHERS VS. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Cou...
Shri. Sourabh S/O Krishnat Magadum vs Shri Gyanendra Pratap Singh
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100351 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRI SOURABH S/O. KRISHNAT MAGADUM AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. KURLI, TQ. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SHIVRAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH AND: Date: 2025.12.04 11:03:01 +05301. SHRI GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CRPF, (RECRUITMENT BRANCH), EAST BLOCK -07, LEVEL -4, SECTOR-01, R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI-110666. -2-2. SHRI MANDEV SINGH BHULLAR PRESIDING OFFICER, BSF BANGALORE, BN HQ 142 BN BSF KARAHALLI, POST. KARAHALLI BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-562110. ACCUSED3. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001. PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.B. KANAVI, ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED/RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SEC...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »