Karnataka Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) o...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) o...
Dr. Mallikarjun Gurulingayya Hiremath vs Kumari. Manushree N
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100170 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. DR. MALLIKARJUN GURULINGAYYA HIREMATH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. SHASHANK, NO.4/2/B, BELAGAVI-590006, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.2. DR. SHAILAJA SHADAKSHARAYYA ARALELIMATH,AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH R/O. SHASHANK, NO.4/2/A, COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.04 11:03:01 +0530 BELAGAVI-590006, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI RAJASHEKAR BURJI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. KUMARI MANJUSHREE N., THE COMMISSIONER COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. -2-2. PRAKASH H. HOSAMANI, THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, DHARWAD, COLLEGE ROAD, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD. ACCUSED3. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. PROFORMA RESPONDENT(B...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd., vs the Special Land Acquistion Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD., VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Varada Prakash S/O Varada Hanumantha Setty vs C. R. Jagadeesh S/O Rang ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 103476 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VARADA PRAKASH S/O VARADA HANUMANTHA SETTY, AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. 3RD WARD, 5TH CROSS, PATEL NAGAR, HOSAPETE, TQ. AND DIST. HOSAPETE (VIJAYANAGAR), PIN CODE-583 201. PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANESH RAIBAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: C.R. JAGADEESH S/O RANGANARAYANA SETTY, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND PETTY MERCHANT, R/O. KOTTRESHWARA GENERAL STORE, OPP. FIRE STATION OFFICE, SANDUR ROAD, HOSAPETE, TQ. AND DIST. HOSAPETE (VIJAYANAGAR), PIN CODE-583 201. RESPONDENT CHANDRASHEKAR (BY SRI. SATISH M.S., ADVOCATE) LAXMAN Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:41 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE +0530 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR ...
Shri Vittal Naik S/O Khondoji vs the Deputy Commissioner
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI VITTAL NAIK S/O KHONDOJI VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »