Karnataka Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt V B Veena W/O V B Sivanand vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 100358 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:1. SMT. V.B. VEENA W/O V.B. SIVANAND, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,2. SMT. V.B. BASAMMA,AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI PIN-583 219. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN PETITIONERS KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:34 +0530 (BY SRI. ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU, PIN-560 001. -2-2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HARAPANAHALLI SUB DIVISION, HARAPANAHALLI, PIN-583 219.3. THE TAHSILDAR HADALGI, TQ. HADALGI, PIN-583 219.4. THE PDO,GRAM PANCHAYAT NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HOOVINHADAGALI, RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. V. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 22...
Sri.Shivamurtayya S/O Basalingayya Balimath vs Sri. Krishna S/O Nagapp ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 100578 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVAMURTAYYA S/O BASALINGAYYA BALIMATH @ KUMBARGERIMATH, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,1. SMT. JAYASHRI W/O SHIVAMURTAYYA BALIMATH, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,2. SMT. SHAILAJADigitally signed by W/O BASAVARAJ STHAVARAMATH, CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, KATTIMANI Location: HIGH R/O: C/O. DR. B.S. STHAVARAMATH, COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH SRI. BASAVESHWAR CLINIC, LAST BUS STOP, Date: 2025.12.05 10:52:29 +0530 NEKAR NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.3. KUMARI GIRIJA D/O SHIVAMURTAYYA BALIMATH, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINAND A. PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:1. SRI. KRISHNA S/O NAGAPPA HEBBAR, SINCE DECEASED.2. SRI. NAGESH3. SRI. MANJUNATH RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.G. MOGALI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; NOTICE TO R5, R7 AND R8 IS HEL...
Hindulida Samajada Abhivruddi Vidyavardak Sanga -R- Giriyal vs the Sta ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[HINDULIDA SAMAJADA ABHIVRUDDI VIDYAVARDAK SANGA - R- GIRIYAL VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14...
Moulasab S/O Gudusab Saidunavar vs Peersab S/O Hasansab Saidunavar
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 113567 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MOULASAB S/O GUDUSAB SAIDUNAVAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: MASON WORK, PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVASAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:1. PEERSAB S/O HASANSAB SAIDUNAVAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH2. MALIKSAB S/O HASANSAB SAIDUNAVAR, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: NIL,3. HUSAINSAB S/O IMAMSAB KOTI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, -2-4. SAYEDSAB S/O IMAMSAB KOTI, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,5. IMAMSAB S/O SAYDUSAB KOTI, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,6. RAZIYAKSAB S/O SAYDUSAB KOTI, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,7. MAULASAB S/O GAUSUSAB KOTI, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,8. MADINSAB S/O HUSSAINSAB KOTI, AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,9. ISMAILSAB S/O HUSSAINSAB KOTI, AGE. 22 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,10. FATOBHI D/...
Shri.Shivabasappa S/O Shankar Ganachari vs Shri.Chandrashekhar S/O Mah ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 114831 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHRI. SHIVABASAPPA S/O SHANKAR GANACHARI, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER, R/O: CTS NO.6924/C, SECTOR IX, PETITIONER (BY SRI. VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O MAHADEVAPA HARDAGATTI, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER, R/O: CTS NO.6924/A, SECTOR IX,Digitally signed by RESPONDENT CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH (BY SRI. HARSHVARDHAN M. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH SRI. M.H. PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE AWRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDERQUASHING THE ORDER DATED 24/09/2019 PASSED IN MISC. APPEAL NO.16/2019 BY THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BELAGAVI VIDE ANNEXURE "L". THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,ORDER WAS M...
Mehaboobbi vs the Managing Director
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101471 OF 2014 (MV-D) BETWEEN:1. MEHABOOBBI WD/O. PEERASAB TAILOR @ YALLUR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,2. IRSHAD AHMED S/O. PEERASAB TAILOR @ YALLUR,AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KUSHAL V. BOLMAL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI NWKRTC BELGAUM DIVISION, BELGAUM. Digitally signed by RESPONDENT GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. SIDDALING C. BHUTI, ADVOCATE) DHARWAD BENCH DHARWADTHIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS, ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05-05-2012 PASSED BY II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND M.A.C.T, BELGAUM IN M.V.C.NO.2902/2010 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED BY THE ...
Arjun S/O. Siddappa Santabanavar vs Smt. Jayalaxmi Raikod
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[ARJUN S/O. SIDDAPPA SANTABANAVAR AND ANOTHER VS. SMT. JAYALAXMI RAIKOD AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 ( PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is present and submits that, the case may be closed as it has become in fructuous. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. As the memo is not filed for closing or withdrawal of the case, the case has to be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory orderby making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject. Hence, the fo...
Sri Suresh S/O Shivalingappa Injagneri vs Sri Rakesh Singh
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SRI SURESH S/O SHIVALINGAPPA INJAGNERI VS. SRI RAKESH SINGH AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is also absent. This shows that, the Complainant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnata...
Basavaraj S/O Ramappa Kanagond vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101683 OF 2025 (439(2)(Cr.PC)/483(3)(BNSS)) BETWEEN: BASAVARAJ S/O. RAMAPPA KANAGOND, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. MEDIA PERSON, R/O. ALAGUR R.C.-587301, TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT. PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB AND: DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD, THROUGH JAMAKHANDI TOWN POLICE STATION.2. CHANDRAVVA MAYAPPA PUJERI, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HALALLI VILLAGE-591265, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. -2-3. SHIVANAND ANNAPPA PATIL,AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HALALLI VILLAGE, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. CHETAN T.LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 43...
Krishna Bhagya Nigama Ltd vs the Special Land Acquqisition Officer
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA NIGAMA LTD VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUQISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Ka...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »