Skip to content

Karnataka Kalaburagi Court June 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 20 2016

Prashant @ Papya and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Bangalore

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-20-2016

(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to against the Judgment dated 27.7.2006 passed by Special Judge and Additional District and Senior Judge Bidar in Special Sessions Case No.37/02. Convicting the respondents/accused 1 to 3 for the offences punishable under Section 302, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal code and sentencing them to undergo R.I. for life each and pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and ID. to undergo RI for 3 years for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 31 of Indian Penal code and further sentencing them to undergo RI for a period of 3 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each and I.D to undergo RI for a period of 6 months for the offence punishable under Section 201 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned Additional State Public Prosecutor. 2. This is an appeal which had been decided by this court wherein the accused had ...


Jun 20 2016

Prashanth @ Papya S/O Naganathrao Vs. The State of Karnataka Through t ...

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-20-2016

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1515 OF2006BETWEEN:1. 2.3. Prashant @ Papya S/o Naganathrao Suryavanshi Dhanagar, Aged about 27 years, Resident of K.H.B. Colony, Bidar. Vinayasingh S/o Pratapsingh Aged about 20 years, Resident of K.H.B. Colony, Bidar. Sanjeevkumar S/o Hanamanthrao Kale, Aged about 20 years, Resident of Subhash Chowk, Bhalki, District: Bidar. APPELLANTS2(Shri B.C. Muddappa, Advocate for Appellant No.1, Shri S.S. Aspalli, Advocate for Appellant No.2, Shri S.K. Babashetty, Advocate for Appellant No.3) AND: The State of Karnataka Through the New Town Police Station, Bidar, Represented by the State Public Prosecutor, Office of the Advocate General, High Court Building, Bangalore 560 001. (Shri K.R. Keshavamurthy, Special State Public Prosecutor) RESPONDENT This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) ...


Jun 15 2016

Earanna Vs. The State of Karnataka represented by its Under Secretary ...

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-15-2016

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue direction or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of respondent No. 2 vide bearing No. REV/MAG/GOONDA ACT/87/2015-16 dated 29.12.2015 under Section 3 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, immoral Traffic offenders and Slum Grabbers Act 1985 (Karnataka Act No. 12/1985) and same is considered and confirmed by the State Advisory Committee bearing Order No. HD 01 SST 2016 dated 03.02.2016 and in pursuance of the same ordering for detention for a period of Twelve Month in orders bearing No. G.KA.Ra/CV/59/2016-17 dated 18.04.2016, which are at Annexure A B and C .) Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate, Raichur dated 29.12.2015 as against the petitioner under Section 3 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous ...


Jun 15 2016

Earanna @ Bonda Earanna S/O Siddalingappa Vs. The State of Karnataka & ...

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-15-2016

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION (HABEAS CORPUS) No.200005/2016 BETWEEN: Earanna @ Bonda Earanna S/o Siddalingappa, Age:46. years, Occupation: Private Work, Represented through his wife Timalamma W/o Earanna @ Bonda Earanna, Age:40. years, Occupation: Housewife, Resident of Jalalnagar, Raichur 584 111. (Shri Avinash A. Uploankar, Advocate) AND:1. The State of Karnataka Represented by its Under Secretary (Law & Order) Home Department, PETITIONER2Vidahana Soudha, Bangalore 01.2. Deputy Commissioner And District Magistrate, Raichur 584 101.3. Superintendent of Police Raichur 584 101. (Shri R.V. Nadagouda, Additional Advocate General) RESPONDENTS This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue direction or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of respondent No.2 ...


Jun 07 2016

M/s. Deccan Education Society Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-07-2016

Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J. 1. The petitioner, M/s. Deccan Education Society, has challenged the legality of the order dated 13.2.2015 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Kalaburagi, whereby the learned Regional Provident Fund Commissioner has dismissed the review application filed by the petitioner under section 7-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ('the Act' for short). 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that, the petitioner-Society is engaged in imparting education to students. The Society is managing various colleges where the education for degree of B.Ed., M.Ed D.Ed., etc., is, imparted and bestowed. The said Society was brought under the cover of the Act from 2009. However, it was discovered by the Assistant Provident fund Commissioner that despite being brought under the cover of the Act the petitioner-Society was not depositing its share of the provident fund for the welfare of its employees. Therefore, the Assistant Pr...


Jun 03 2016

Vayogeppa @ Shivagondappa and Others Vs. Somashekar and Another

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-03-2016

(Prayer: These petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order passed on I.A.No.2 and I.A.No.5 dated 24.02.2016 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayapur, in R.A.No.45/2007, the certified copy is at Annexure-'F' and etc.) 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 24.02.2016, passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayapur, whereby the learned Judge has allowed the applications filed under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC by the respondent/plaintiff for adducing additional evidence. 2. Briefly facts of the case are that Somashekar, the respondent, had instituted a civil suit namely, O.S.No.160/1983, against Mr. Shivayogeppa for specific performance of contract dated 14.02.1980 in respect of the land bearing RS No.652/1A, admeasuring 2 acres 5 guntas, situated in the village Mahalabagayat, Vijayapur. Since Mr. Shivayogeppa, the defendant, did not appear before the learned trial court, the learned trial co...


Jun 02 2016

Gurayya @ Gurumurthy and Another Vs. The State through, Farhatabad Pol ...

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Jun-02-2016

(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the Judgment dated 13.10.2010 and order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge at Gulbarga in Special Case No.170/2007, thereby convicting the appellants/accused No.1 and 3 for the offences punishable under section 498(A) and 304(B) read with Sec. 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act and the appellants/accused No.1 and 3 are sentenced to undergo an imprisonment for a period of one year and pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each. In default, they shall undergo an imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Further the appellants/accused No.1 and 3 are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of Seven years each for the offence punishable under Section 304 (B) read with Section 34 of Indian Penal...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial