Karnataka Kalaburagi Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mola @ Maillai and Another Vs. Mainuddin Mukbul Shaik and Another
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 173 (1) of MV Act, against the Judgment and Award Dated 23.07.2013 passed in MVC No:1629/2012 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.V at Bijapur, partly allowing the Claim Petition and seeking Enhancement of Compensation.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bijapur in MVC No.1629/2012. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would contend that the deceased Akbar was working as a Motor Mechanic and was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. But the Tribunal, without appreciating the evidence placed on record, determined the notional monthly income at Rs.4,500/- contrary to the well-settled principles of law. It is further contended that no compensation is awarded under the head loss of love and affection. Accordingly, he seeks for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 4. Per co...
M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Raichur Vs. Shivaram and Others
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
S. Sujatha, J. 1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation at Raichur in WCA No. 78 to 80/2003. Since these matters arise from the common judgment of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (the 'Commissioner' for short), all these matters are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by this Common judgment. 2. Briefly stated the facts are:- The claimants preferred the claim petition seeking compensation contending that the first claimant was working as a driver, the second claimant as a cleaner and the third claimant as a labourer in a lorry bearing registration No.KA-35/0572 under respondent No. 2 herein. It is the case of the claimants that on 11.11.1999, as per the direction of the second respondent herein, they were proceeding in the said lorry and due to the mechanical defect, the said vehicle met with an accident and in the said accident, claimants suffered grievous injuries which caused permanent di...
Siddu Vs. The State, through Hulsoor P.S., represented by Addl. State ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-23-2016
(Prayer: This Crl. Petition is filed u/s. 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the impugned order dated 22.04.2015 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Bidar (holding Concurrent charge of Addl. Sessions Judge, Bidar), in special case No. 4/2015 while passing order under Section 34 of Pocso Act .) 1. The petitioner, who is arraigned as an accused in Special Case No. 4/2015 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bidar (hereinafter referred to as the Special Judge for short), has approached this Court seeking quashing of the order dated 22.04.2015. The Learned Special Judge in the said case has passed an order under Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 holding that the petitioner is aged more than 18 years as on the date of the alleged offence and therefore, he can be tried before the Special Court itself. 2. The records disclose that, earlier, the petitioner has approached this Court in Criminal Petition No. 200335/2015 calling in question the order dated 23....
Siddu @ Siddeshwar S/O Bhagwanrao Mane Vs. The State Through Hulsoor p ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF APRIL, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION No.200464/2015 BETWEEN SIDDU @ SIDDESHWAR, S/O. BHAGWANRAO MANE, AGE:20. YEARS, (IN FACT PETITIONER IS AGED18YEARS), OCC: STUDENT IN PUC II YEAR, R/O. MEHKAR, BHALKI TALUK, BIDAR DISTRICT. (PRESENTLY IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) (BY SRI. SANJAY A. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND ... PETITIONER THE STATE, THROUGH HULSOOR P.S., REP. BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, KALABURAGI. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAQBOOL AHMED, HCGP) THIS CRL. PETITION IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER2SESSIONS DATED2204.2015 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND (HOLDING CONCURRENT CHARGE OF ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, BIDAR), IN SPECIAL CASE NO.4/2015 WHILE PASSING ORDER UNDER SECTION34OF POCSO ACT. BIDAR JUDGE AT THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDER ON1003.2016, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER, THIS DAY, THE COURT ...
Ranganath and Another Vs. The State Through Devadurga Police Station
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Pleased to Exercise the Inherent Power U/Sec. 482 Cr.P.C. Examine the Records and Quash the Proceedings Pending befroe in the Court of Civil Judge and JMFC at Devadurga, in C.C. No. 68/2016 (Crime No.30/2016), against the Petitioners, which is Registered for the Offence P/U/S 171(H) and 188 r/w 34 of IPC.) 1. Heard Sri Avinash Uplaonkar, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader. 2. A person by name Shivasharanappa Kattolli, Tahasildar Devadurga has lodged a complaint before the Devadurga police for the offences punishable under sections 171(H) and 188 of Indian Penal Code against the petitioners. 3. It is alleged in the complaint that, 27.01.2016 was the last date for submission of nomination for assembly bye-election of Devadurga. It is alleged that between 11.30 and 04.00 p.m. in the APMC yard of Devadurga, the petitioners have allowed the Congess-I and BJP party people to p...
The Branch Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Sinnur Complex, Shahapur, Re ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to allow this Criminal Petition and thereby quash the order of issuing of process dated 09.04.2015 in C.C.No.401/2015 (arising out of P.C. No.16/2014) for the offence punishable U/Sec.379 of IPC pending on the file of Addl. JMFC Court at Shahapur.) 1. The petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.2 in P.C.No.16/2014 later registered as C.C.No.401/2015 for the offence under Sections 379, 411, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC., sought for quashing of the said entire proceedings. 2. I have heard the arguments Sri R.S.Lagali, for the petitioner and Sri Shivakumar Kalloor for respondent No.1 and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.2. I have carefully perused the records. Today learned counsel Sri R.S.Lagali, has also produced three documents with list. 3. The brief factual matrix that emanate from the records are that: Respondent No.1 Sri Pullarao has filed a private complaint against Managi...
Mallappa and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented by Addl. S ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and order of conviction dated 07/12.08.2010 passed in Sessions Case No.149/2009, by the Fast Track Court-I/II at Bijapur.) 1. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the complainant/injured has compromised the matter with the appellants therefore, he may be permitted to implead the defacto complainant as one of the respondents in this case. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to implead the defacto complainant as respondent No.2 in this case. The amendment is carried out to that effect. 2. Sri Mahantesh Patil, learned counsel has filed vakalath for respondent No.2. 3. A joint memo has been filed by the appellants and respondent No.2 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking permission of the Court to permit the appellants and respondent No.2 to compound the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, ...
The Branch Manager the Oriental Insurance co.ltd., Vs. Mst. Kashibai W ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF APRIL2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA MFA NO.30987/2013 (MV) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., S.S.ROAD, BIDAR COMPLEX, BIJAPUR 586 101 PRESENTLY REPRESENTED BY ITS SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, GULBARGA 585 102 (BY SRI SUDARSHAN M., ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. SMT. KASHIBAI W/O GURALINGAPPA KUMBAR, AGED ABOUT51YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/AT NAGUR, TQ: AKKALKOT, DIST: SOLAPUR 400 001 GANGADHAR S/O GURULINGAPPA KUMBAR, AGED ABOUT29YEARS, OCC: COOLIE R/AT NAGUR, TQ: AKKALKOT, DIST: SOLAPUR 400 001 APPELLANT23.4. SANGAMANATH S/O GURULINGAPPA KUMBAR, AGED ABOUT22YEARS, OCC: COOLIE R/AT NAGUR, TQ: AKKALKOT, DIST: SOLAPUR 400 001 SRI SHREEMANTH S/O HUSANAYYA GUTTEDAR AGED ABOUT46YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS & OWNER OF THE JEEP No.KA-09/M-4033 R/O SULEPETH, TQ: CHINCHOLI, DIST: GULBARGA 400 001 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BAPUGOUDA SIDDAPPA, ADVOCA...
Sardarpasha and Others Vs. Sameena Begum and Another
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to allow this petition and quash the initiation and continuation of proceedings against the petitioners herein and those accused No.2 to 10 in Crime No.87/2015 registered with the Market Yard Police Station, Raichur Circle for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 498-A, 504 r/w Section 149 of IPC.) 1. Petitioners who are arraigned as accused Nos.2 to 10 in Crime No.87/2015 are before this Court seeking for quashing of the FIR as well as all further investigation pending against them. 2. Notice has been issued to the first respondent and she is represented by her counsel. The second respondent is represented by the learned High Court Government Pleader. 3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent No.1. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been arrayed as accused persons unnecess...
The State Through Lokayuktha Police Vs. Sadashiva S. Yelagod
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed Under section 397 R/W 401 Of Cr.P.C. Praying to Quash the Order Dated 15.3.08 Passed By The Prl. S.J., Gulbarga, In Spl Case No.128/07 thereby ordering The Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga to file Charge Sheet after obtaining Necessary Sanction to Prosecute the Accusedand Direct The Prl S.J., Gulbarga To Take The Cognizance And To Proceed In Accordance With Law.) 1. The petitioner Sadashiva S. yelagod (hereafter referred as Accused) as well as the State through the Karnataka Lokayuktha Police (herein after referred as State for short) have called in question the order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge at Gulbarga in Spl. Case No.128/2007, wherein the learned Sessions Judge has rejected the application under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. filed by the accused and ordered to return the charge sheet to the State with liberty for them to file charge sheet against the petitioner after obtaining necessary sanction to prosecute him. Ho...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›