Karnataka Gulbarga Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abraham and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Department of Ministry of P ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned notices bearing o.SAM/KAM/CHUNAVANE/12/2014-15 in Form-2, dated 21.06.2014 by respondent No.3 alleged to have issued to the petitioners vide Annexures-D, D1 to D3 and issue a direction to the respondent No.3 to issue notices afresh and conduct meeting of No Confidence as per law.) 1. Petitioners are members of the Gram Panchayat, Sirawara village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District. They are challenging the action of the respondent-Authority in convening the meeting of the Gram Panchayat, to consider the No-confidence Motion moved against the Adhyaksha of the Gram Panchayat. 2. The twin contentions urged by the learned Counsel for the petitioners are, that the impugned notices issued by the 3rd respondent were not served on the petitioners and although they purport to bear the signatures of the petitioners, the said signatures have been forged. The second contention is, that...
Syed Shafi Quaderi and Others Vs. Syed Jahanger Ali, Ayed Sadat Ali an ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-13-2014
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of Motor Vehicle Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated 20.10.2011 Passed In Mvc No.211/2009 On The File Of The Senior Civil Judge And Motor Accident Claims Tribunal At Humnabad, Wherein Partly Allowing The Claim Petition And Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.) 1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 20.10.2011 passed in MVC No.211/2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Humnabad, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking for enhancement of compensation. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, this matter is heard on merits. The material placed before this Court is sufficient to dispose of the matter at this stage. 3. Parties will be referred to with reference to the status in the claims tribunal. 4. The appellants have produced the copies ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›