Karnataka Gulbarga Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.V. Subba Rao and Another Vs. Land Acquisition Officer, Dist Raichur ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 20-11-2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Sr.Dn.), Lingasugar, in EP No.19/2007 vide Annexure-L, restore the Execution Petition and dismiss/overrule the objections filed by respondents vide Annexure-H, E.P. No.19/2007, dated 20-08-2007.) 1. This writ petition is filed by the Decree Holder challenging the order passed by the Executing Court upholding the objection of the Judgment Debtor that the Decree Holder is not entitled to payment of interest prior to the issue of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which is hereinafter referred to as the Act. 2. The petitioners were the owners of land bearing Sy.No.12(A) and 12(AA) measuring 2 acres 12 guntas of Singapore Village in Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District. The said land was notified for acquisition for the construction of Ayacut Road from RG Road to Kakkargol Village....
Babu Vs. the State of Karnataka (Through Ratkal Police Station) Repres ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the order of conviction and sentence in S.C.No.232/2008 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga and acquit the appellant.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader. 2. The accused is in appeal in the following circumstances:- The appellant was accused of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity). The complainant Sonabai was a resident of Hanumantwadi in Basavakalyan Taluk, Bidar District. She had two daughters, Laxmibai and Sangeeta. She had lost her husband about 12 years prior to the complaint. She had performed the marriage of her elder daughter Laxmi six years prior to the complaint. Lakshmi was married to the present appellant. It is claimed that the accused had looked after Lakshmi ...
Mrs. Peeranbi Vs. Hajimalang
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of the Crl.P.C. praying to call for records of the court below and set aside the judgment and order dated 6.10.2007 passed by the JMFC-II Court, Bijapur in C.C.No.222/2005 and convict the respondent.) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The appellant was the complainant before the Trial Court, who had alleged an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NI Act' for brevity). The complaint having been contested, was dismissed. Hence the present appeal is filed. 3. It is the case of the appellant that the appellant and the respondent were good friends. Since the respondent was in need of money, he had raised a hand loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the appellant, which was lent under two installments dated 25.06.2003 and 26.10.2003. The same was to be repaid on or before 1.10.2004. The same not having been paid on ...
Sharnabasappa, and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Through Kamalapu ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
(Prayer: Gulbarga-585 101. ... Respondent. (By Shri S.S. Aspalli, Government Pleader) This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order of conviction and sentence dated 23.10.2008 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special Case NO.131/2004, convicting the appellants / accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326 read with Section 34 of the IPC and each accused are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days for the offence punishable under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC and further, each accused are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days for the offence punishable under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC and further, each accused are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and to pay a fine of Rs.2,0...
Mallesh Vs. the State of Karnataka, Represented by Circle Inspector of ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 read with Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. praying to acquit the appellant on all charges levelled and framed against him in S.C.No.79/2007, by setting aside the judgment passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge and P.O., Fast Track Court-III, Raichur, in S.C.No.79/2007 dated 29.09.2007, impugned herein, and to release the appellant from judicial custody.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader. 2. The appellant was the accused before the Trial Court in the following background: Lakshmi, the daughter of Pomanna and Shankaramma, had alleged that she along with her parents, were residents of Alkot Tanda, within the limits of Jalahalli Police Station, in Devadurga Taluk. The appellant was the resident of A.G. Colony and was related to Lakshmi. A.G Colony was about 2 kms from Alkot Tanda. It is claimed that during July 2006, Lakshmi was aged about 19 and during that time, her parents had gone in search ...
M.K. ShafiuddIn Vs. Halima Khatoon and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to quash the entire proceedings in Crl.Misc.No.55/2010 on the file of the Family Judge at Raichur.) The petitioner is said to be the husband of respondent no.1 and respondents 2 and 3 are their children. The petitioner and respondent no.1 are separated. The children are living with respondent no.1. The respondents had filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.PC', for brevity), seeking maintenance in a sum of Rs.5,000/- per month for herself and a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month for the children, that is respondents 2 and 3, for their maintenance from the date of the petition. The said petition was filed in the year 2010. The petitioner on receiving notice of the same, has appeared therein and has filed his objections. The marriage is admitted and there is no dispute that the children are their own. However, it was alleged by r...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›